Action in time of judicial legal provision in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.135.83989Keywords:
the оperation of judicial legal provisions in time, jurisprudence, retroactivity, prospectivityAbstract
The author analyzes the temporal effect of general legal provisions created by higher judicial authorities in Ukraine. Views on the temporal effect of the latter are based on the appropriate understanding of their nature. The gradual recognition of a certain law-making value of such provisions urges the change of perceptions of their temporal effect, in particular, in terms of application of the rules on nonretroactivity to them to a certain extent. Today, however, many cases of legal provisions of higher courts have retroactive effect which is much a result of interpretation of law. Meanwhile the retroactivity of the Supreme Court opinions is limited by the period for filing petitions for reviewing of the delivereed judgments. In other cases, there are no procedural mechanisms for such review. Thus the legislation on this issue is somewhat controversial, which is one of the areas to be improved.
References
Dychko, A.V. (2011). Utrata sily aktov oficialnogo tolkovanija v Rossijskoj Federacii. Juridicheskaja nauka i praktika : vestnik Nizhegor. akademii MVD Rossii, 1 (14). 345–348 [in Russian].
Elcova, T.S. (2010). Dejstvie vo vremeni normativnyh pravovyh aktov i aktov oficialnogo normativnogo tolkovanija: problemy teorii i praktiki. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. N. Novgorod : Nizhegor. gos. un-t im. N. I. Lobachevskogo [in Russian].
Malyshev, B.V. (2002). Sudovyj precedent u pravovij systemi Anglii (teoretyko-pravovyj aspekt). Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: KNU [in Ukrainian].
Rekcigel, Sh. (2009). Nemeckij opyt o nedopustimosti obratnoj sily reshenij vysshih sudebnyh organov FRG, uhudshajushhih polozhenie nalogoplatel’shhika. Nalogovoe pravo v reshenijah Konstitucionnogo Suda RF 2007 goda : po materialam V Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. 11-12 aprelja 2008 g. – Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 109–118). Moscow [in Russian].
5. Tyhyj, V. (2001). Dija rishen Konstytucijnogo Sudu Ukrainy v chasi. Visnyk Konstytucijnogo Sudu Ukrainy, 5, 51–53 [in Ukrainian].
Shevchuk, S. (2007). Sudova pravotvorchist: svitovyj dosvid i perspektyvy v Ukraini. Kyiv: Referat [in Ukrainian].
Pushnіak, O.V. (2015). Dija u chasi sudovyh pravopolozhen [Action in time of judicial legal provision]. Teorija i praktyka pravoznavstva, 1 (7). Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/tipp_2015_1_7 [in Ukrainian].
Cherdancev, A.F. (2003). Tolkovanie prava i dogovora : ucheb. posobie dlja vuzov. Moscow: JuNITI-DANA [in Russian].
Tyhyj, V. (2006). Povnovazhennja Konstytucijnogo Sudu Ukrainy ta pravova pryroda joho rishen. Visnyk Akademii pravovyh nauk Ukrainy, 4 (47), 55–65 [in Ukrainian].
Spasov, B. (1986). Zakon i ego tolkovanie. Moscow: Jurid. lit. [in Russian].
Vlasov, Ju.L. (2001). Problemy tlumachennja norm prava : monografija. Kyiv: In-t derzhavy i prava im. V.M. Koreckogo NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Magaziner, Ja.M. (2006). Izbrannye trudy po obshсhej teorii prava. A. K. Kravcov (Ed.). Sankt-Peterburg: Jurid. centr Press [in Russian].
Analiz sudovoi praktyky zastosuvannja zvorotnoi dii zakonu pro kryminalnu vidpovidalnist u chasi. Retrieved from: http://www.scourt.gov.ua/clients/vsu/vsu.nsf/(documents)/4E106A1CAAC05D6BC2257EFA002FFE2E [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Олексій Віталійович Пушняк
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
