Some issues of the ensuring of rights and legal interests of persons at the interrogation by the videoconference at the pre-trial investigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.135.82922Keywords:
interrogation, investigative action, testimonies, rights, legal interests, videoconference, specialist, proper quality of the image, proper quality of the soundAbstract
The article is connected with the analysis of rules of the current CPC of Ukraine which regulated the application of videoconference at the interrogation at the pre-trial investigation. The research has showed that there are some problem aspects of ensuring of the rights and legal interests of the participation of criminal proceedings. First of all, such right of suspect as a refusing of giving testimonies can’t be realized fully, because there is not any procedure, which provides getting of such refuse by the investigator or a prosecutor, who situates remotely from suspect. At the same time, the official, who is situated near the suspect can’t get this refuse, because he hasn’t such competency.
Also there are some problems with the engaging of the specialist to the interrogation with the application of videoconference. There is not compulsory demand to the officials who are providing this investigative action to engage such participation of criminal proceedings. But the absence of the specialist can lead to the impossibility providing of interrogation in the conditions of quality sound, image and the information security.
References
Alekseev, N.S., Daev, V.G., & Kokorev, L.D. (1980). Ocherk razvitija nauki sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa [The feature article of the evolution of the soviet criminal procedure science]. Voronezh: Voronezh University [in Russian].
Gorskij, G.F., Kokorev, L.D., & Jel’kind, P.S. (1978). Problemy dokazatel’stv v sovetskom ugolovnom processe [The problems of evidences in the soviet criminal procedure]. Voronezh: Voronezh University [in Russian].
Panjushkin, V.A. (2016). Nauchno-tehnicheskij progress i problemy razrabotki novogo UPK Rossii: neobhodimost’ i osnovnye trebovanija k pravovoj reglamentacii ispol’zovanija dostizhenij nauchno-tehnicheskogo progressa v ugolovnom processe [Scientific and technical progress and the problems of development of the new CPC of the Russia: necessity and the main requirements to the law regulation of the achievements of the scientific and technical progress in the criminal procedure]. Sudebnaja vlast’ i ugolovnyj process – Judicial Branch and the Criminal Procedure, 1, 16–21 [in Russian].
Kaznachej, I.V. (2014). Ispol’zovanie tehnicheskih sredstv kommunikacii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (puti sovershenstvovanija) ) [Using of technical means of the communication in the criminal procedure (the ways of the development)]. Candidate’s thesis. Volgograd [in Russian].
Chernychenko, I.V. (2015). Zastosuvannia videokonferentsii u kryminal’nomu provadzhenni Ukrainy [Application of the videoconference in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Alerta [in Ukrainian].
Chizhov, M.V. (2013). Primenenie informacionnyh i kommunikacionnyh tehnologij v sudebnoj dejatel’nosti v uslovijah formirovanija informacionnogo obshhestva [The using of the information and communicative technologies in the judicial activity in the conditions of organization of information society]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Serdjuk, V. (2013). Videokonferencija v ugolovnom proizvodstve Ukrainy [The videoconference in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine]. LegeasiViata – The Law and the Life, 11/4, 180-183 [in Russian].
Silant’eva, I.R. (2013). Problemy i perspektivy ispol’zovanija sistem videokonferencsvjazi v processe pravorealizacii [The problems of using the systems of videoconference in the procedure of realization of the law]. Vektor nauki TGU – The vektor of science of TGU, 1, 246–249 [in Russian].
Knizhenko, S.O., & Demenko, T.V. (2013). Osoblyvosti dopytu v rezhymi videokonferentsii pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannia [The features of the interrogation at the pre-trial investigation]. Visnyk Kharkivs’koho natsional’noho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina – The messenger of the Kharkiv National University named after V.N. Karazin, 14, 208–211 [in Ukrainian].
Sinepol, V.S., & Cikin, I.A. (1999). Sistemy komp’juternoj videokonferencsvjazi [The systems of the computer videoconference]. Moscow : LTD «Mobile communications» [in Russian].
Prokopova, A.A. (2013). Osobennosti primenenija videokonferenc-svjazi v ugolovnom processe [The features of using the videoconference in the criminal procedure]. Vestnik Karagandinskoj akademii Ministerstva vnutrennih del Respubliki Kazahstan – The messenger of the Academy of the Ministry of the Internal cases of the Kazakhstan, 4, 101–103 [in Russian].
Budnikov, Ye.A., Filippova N.A. (2011). Tehnologii besprovodnoj peredachi dannyh dlja organizacii videokonferencij [The technologies of wireless communication for the organization of the videoconference]. Uspehi sovremennogo estestvoznanija – The success of the modern natural sciences, 7, 83 [in Russian].
Mykhal’chuk, T.V. (2013). Osoblyvosti provedennia okremykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dij u rezhymi videokonferentsii [The features of the some investigation actions conducting in the regime of the videoconference]. Krymynalystyka y sudebnaia ekspertyza – Criminalistics and the Forensic Science, 58, 138–144 [in Ukrainian].
Bortun, M. (2014). Aktual’ni pytannia provedennia dopytu u rezhymi videokonferentsii [Relevant issues of videoconference questioning]. Visnyk Natsional’noi akademii prokuratury Ukrainy – The messenger of the National academy of the Prosecutor Office of Ukraine, 1, 64–70 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Д. О. Шингарьов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
