Improvement of national legislation in alternative resolution of legal disputes area

Ярослав Павлович Любченко

Abstract


Problem setting.

Current legislation does not adequately regulate using of alternative dispute resolution. The article emphasizes the need for amending existing legislation to ensure its compliance with international standards, its obligations in connection with the signing of the Association Agreement and ensure efficient use of alternative dispute resolution (hereinafter - ADR) party relations.

Recent research and publications analysis. Problems of alternative dispute resolution were viewed in their works viewed N. Bondarenko-Zelinska, Y. Pritika, O. Spectr, A. Shypilova, V. Yakovleva and others.

Paper objective

The article goal is to analyze the proposals of the Constitutional Commission in the field of justice, as well as analysis of bills related to ADR, research of problems of legal regulation, which will help optimize procedures and improve the law in general.

The paper main body.

Realization of economic, political, governmental, legal and other reforms in society lead to a significant strengthening of social and legal tensions, the emergence of a large number of conflicts in the legal field. Traditionally, parties use courts that are organized and funded by the state in order to protect rights and legal interests. However, justice for many obvious advantages has several disadvantages: a large workload of courts, length and complexity of the proceedings, considerable legal costs not properly worked out mechanism of the principle of competition and equality.

Conclusions of the research.

Problems of alternative dispute resolution in domestic legal literature are mostly synthesis and theoretical. Various alternative forms, procedures, and methods are used by foreign countries, along with the traditional proceedings. They do not replace justice and do not deprive the persons right for judicial protection. Instead, give them a choice between public or non-governmental (private) forms of resolving legal disputes, allowing parties to decide which type of procedures will help to resolve specific legal dispute.


Keywords


arbitration; mediation, bill; legislation; alternative dispute resolution; court branch of law; execution of court decision

References


Muliavka, D. H. (2014) "Pidvyshchennia Efektyvnosti Vykonannia Sudovykh Rishen." Yurydychnyi Naukovyi Elektronyi Zhurnal : n. pag. Web. 24 Nov. 2015. <http://www.lsej.org.ua/5_2014/42.pdf>

Proekt Zmin Do Konstytutsii Ukrainy v Chastyni Pravosuddia. (2015) Constitution Commission. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2015. <http://constitution.gov.ua/work/item/id/13>

Dynamyka Kolychestva Del MKAS 2000-2014. Rep. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2015. <http://arb.ucci.org.ua/icac/ru/report.html>

Ukraine. Parliament. 4. Zakonoproekt “Pro Vnesennia Zmin Do Deiakykh Zakonodavchykh Aktiv (shchodo Vzhyttia Zakhodiv Zabezpechennia Pozovu U Pidtrymku Mizhnarodnoho Arbitrazhu)”. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2015. <http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=48574>.

"Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy “Pro Sudovu Praktyku Rozghliadu Tsyvilnykh Sprav Pro Vyznannia Pravochyniv Nediisnymy”vid 06.11.2009 № 9." N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2015. <http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0009700-09>

Uhoda Pro Asotsiatsiiu Mizh Ukrainoiu Ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom." N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2015. <http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=248387631>.


GOST Style Citations


  1. Мулявка Д. Г. Підвищення ефективності виконання судових рішень [Електронний ресурс] / Д. Г. Мулявка // Юридичний науковий електроний журнал. – 2014. – Режим доступу до ресурсу: http://www.lsej.org.ua/5_2014/42.pdf.
  2. Проект змін до Конституції України в частині правосуддя [Електронний ресурс]. – 2015. – Режим доступу до ресурсу: http://constitution.gov.ua/work/item/id/13.
  3. Динамика количества дел МКАС 2000-2014 [Електронний ресурс]. – 2015. – Режим доступу до ресурсу: http://arb.ucci.org.ua/icac/ru/report.html.
  4. Законопроект “Про внесення змін до деяких законодавчих актів (щодо вжиття заходів забезпечення позову у підтримку міжнародного арбітражу)” [Електронний ресурс]. – 2013. – Режим доступу до ресурсу: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=48574.
  5. Постанова Пленуму Верховного Суду України “Про судову практику розгляду цивільних справ про визнання правочинів недійсними” від 06.11.2009 № 9 [Електронний ресурс]. – 2009. – Режим доступу до ресурсу: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0009700-09.
  6. Угода про асоціацію між Україною та Європейським Союзом [Електронний ресурс]. – 2014. – Режим доступу до ресурсу: http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=248387631.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.131.55433

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2224-9281