Discretion of public administration: Essence and Legal Regulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.170.338076Keywords:
discretionary authority, discretion, principles of administrative procedure, public administrationAbstract
Scientific articles examine the essence and legal content of the discretion of public administration. It was found that discretion can take place in law-making and in political activity, as well as in the process of law enforcement – in public administration and in the administration of justice. Administrative discretion can be exercised when executive and local self-government bodies perform a number of functions, which include by-law rule-making, resolution of administrative cases, conclusion of administrative contracts, resolution of issues of public service, other cases of an internal and external organizational nature. Administrative discretion is based on the discretion of the public administration, which is associated with the process of reflection and reflection. The key elements of dissection are powers, choices and decisions, which collectively form a legally significant tool for the power influence of public administration. In the activities of the public administration, decisions can relate to the choice of various options for behavior: act (make a decision) or refrain from actions (making a decision); act (make a decision) in the form of one of the proposed alternatives; act (make a decision) guided by one's own vision, common sense and prudently, but at the same time, without going beyond the limits of the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. There are two normative legal acts in force in Ukraine, which establish provisions on discretionary powers – Methodology of anti-corruption examination and Law of Ukraine «On administrative procedure». The latter enshrines the principles that a public administration must adhere to when exercising discretionary powers. The conditions for ensuring legality are particularly significant. In addition, the bodies of executive power and local self-government must take into account the goal for the achievement of which discretionary power has been granted to them.
References
Kuchuk A. M. (2023). Discretion as a general legal category: propaedeutic aspect. Ukrainian political and legal discourse. 7. Retrieved from https://zenodo.org/records/14768178.
Kolesnyk V. A. (2020) Discretionary powers of state authorities as a subject of consideration of public legal disputes. Investments: practice and experience. 5-6, 141-146 [іn Ukrainian].
Kovbas I.V, Koval M.V, Moroz S.S. (2023) To the question of the formalized fixation in the legislation of Ukraine of the term «discretion» as a phenomenon used in the process of public administration and in the implementation of judicial proceedings. Scientific legal journal. 20, 244 – 251. Retrieved from http://legalnovels.in.ua/journal/20_2023/34.pdf.
Muse O.V, Nesterik M.O. (2024) Characteristics of regulatory grounds for the application of discretionary powers. Legal scientific electronic journal. 6, 234 – 237. Retrieved from http://lsej.org.ua/6_2024/59.pdf/.
Koch, Charles H. Jr. (1986) Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion. George Washington Law Review. 54, 469–511. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1569&context=facpubs.
Vest V. (1984) Structured administrative discretion: striving for rationality and sensitivity. American Journal of Political Science. 2, T. 28, 340-360. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2110876.
Hui Wang, Haoyu Xu, Yiyang Zhou, Xueqing Li. A (2022 )Contrastive Evaluation Method for Discretion in Administrative Penalty. Electronics, 11 (9). Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/9/1388.
Cartier G. (2009) Administrative Discretion and the Spirit of Legality: From Theory to Practice. Canadian journal of law and society. 24 (3), 313-335. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-law-and-society-la-revue-canadienne-droit-et-societe/article/abs/administrative-discretion-and-the-spirit-of-legality-from-theory-to-practice/EBA7A0C4A7617BE3C669D40BBDB998E6.
Covilla J. C. (2025) Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Discretion: Exploring Adaptations and Boundaries. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 16, Special Issue 1: Special Issue on Charting the Landscape of Automation of Regulatory Decision-Making. 36 – 50. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-risk-regulation/article/artificial-intelligence-and-administrative-discretion-exploring-adaptations-and-boundaries/7CBC719CC09F8B01845BDCED238C2A40
Grin A.A. (2019) Discretion of the authorized bodies of the executive power and their implementation: Doctor of Science. Kyiv, 256 p. Retrieved from https://uacademic.info/ua/document/0419U000618.
Ivanchenko Y.M. (2025) Law enforcement discretion in conditions of social crisis: theoretical and legal aspects: thesis. doctor philosopher. Donetsk University named after. Vasyl Stus. 193 p. Retrieved from https://abstracts.donnu.edu.ua/issue/view/574.
Shindel I.V. (2025) Discretion in the activities of the National Police of Ukraine: dis. doctor philosopher. Odesa. 213 p. Retrieved from https://dspace.oduvs.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/d152c4b9-d90f-4fbb-a4d8-591f9e3b8405/content
Law of Ukraine № 2073-IX «On administrative procedure» (2022, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/2073-IX#Text/
Gubska O. Discretion and its limits: what national and international legislation says about it. Retrieved from https://sud.ua/ru/news/blog/187673-diskretsiya-ta-yiyi-mezhi-scho-govorit-pro-tse-natsionalne-ta-mizhnarodne-zakonodavstvo
General administrative law: textbook /under the general editorship of R. S. Melnyka. Second edition. Odesa: Publishing House «Helvetica», 2023. 690 p.
Great Ukrainian Legal Encyclopedia: Vol. 5 : Administrative law /editor: Yu.P. Bytyak and others. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2016. 960 p.
Scientific opinion on the limits of the discretionary power of the subject of authority and judicial control over its implementation. Retrieved from https://court.gov.ua/archive/464655/
Recommendation No. r (80) 2 Of the Committee of Ministers concerning the exercise of discriminatory powers by administrative authorities: Council of Europe Committee of Ministers at 10.3.1980. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/16804f22ae
On approval of the Methodology for conducting anti-corruption examination: order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine dated 04/24/2017 № 1395/5. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v1395323-17#Text (address date: 07/20/2025).
On the National Police: Law of Ukraine dated 07/2/2015 № 580-VIII. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/580-19#Text.
Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses dated 07.12.1984 № 8073-X. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text.
On Local State Administrations: Law of Ukraine dated 04/09/1999. Retrieved from № 586-XIV https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/586-14#Text
On the approval of the Regulations on the Ministry of Development of Communities and Territories of Ukraine: post. CMU from 06/30/2015 № 460. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/460-2015-%D0%BF#Text
On central bodies of executive power: Law of Ukraine dated March 17, 2011 № 3166-VI. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3166-17#Text
ECtHR decisions in the case «Olsson v. Sweden» dated 03/24/1988. Retrieved from https://precedent.in.ua/2016/04/09/olsson-protyv-shvetsyy/
Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz (VwVfG) Inhaltsübersicht 25.05.1976. Retrieved from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwvfg/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ольга Соловйова, Ірина Бойко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.