Right on Post-trial Access to Investigational Treatment
Keywords:clinical trial, post-trial access, post-trial treatment, investigational treatment, right on innovation
The article explores the modern condition of the legal regulation of post-trial access to investigational treatment. The author has determined main arguments concerning the necessity of foreseeing such a right and the problematic issues that arise in case of its implementation. On the one hand, a subject can legitimately expect that s/he will continue to have access to beneficial treatment after the end of trial, for example, if it alleviates the symptoms of a chronic illness, depriving a trial subject from the beneficial post-trial access would defeat the basic principle of medical ethics. At the same time, this provision may have a large financial burden on the sponsor of the trial; it is difficult to control the occurrence of serious adverse reactions; providing post-trial access only to the subjects of the trial and denying others create disparity among patients.
The particular attention is paid to international standards and experience of foreign countries in this field. The legal and regulatory acts of Ukraine do not have any provisions on post-trial access to investigational treatment. The main international ethical guidelines, such as Declaration of Helsinki, CIOMS/WHO Guidelines, contain such a right, but they have different formulations and volumes that only intensify professional discussions. The most common norm is as follows: «a responsibility of sponsor to supply details of the plan for treatment or care of subjects once their participation in the trial has ended», which, in contradistinction to the Ukrainian legislation, is not connected with the causing damage to the subject. The author also has researched a unique case of Brazil, where the post-trial drug access program must make the medication available and free of charge to the subjects of the research in the cases of concluding the trial or after the patients’ participation in the study.
On this base, the author offered to provide in the legislation of Ukraine requirements to inform in advance subjects about the presence or absence of post-trial access and to evaluate these provisions by ethics committees before and at the end of all trials in order to determine its real need in each individual case. The scope of the right on post-trial access to investigational treatment must be reasonably weighed in order to avoid, on the one hand, becoming an excessive stimulus for the subjects, and, on the other hand, not leading to a situation where on such regulation conducting of clinical trials in the country will no longer be appropriate.
Doval D.C., Shirali R., Sinha R. (2015). Post-trial access to treatment for patients participating in clinical trials. Perspect Clin Res, Vol. 6, issue 2, 82–85. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2F2229-3485.154003.
Usharani P, Naqvi S.H. (2013). Post-trial access. Perspect Clin Res. Vol. 4, issue 1, 58-60. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2F2229-3485.106391.
Grady C. (2005).The Challenge of Assuring Continued Post-Trial Access to Beneficial Treatment. Yale Journal of Health Policy. Vol. 5, issue 1, 425-435. URL: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol5/iss1/15.
Ievropeiska khartiia prav patsiienta vid 15 lystopada 2002 roku // Ofitsiinyi sait Lvivskoho derzhavnoho medychnoho universytetu imeni Danyla Halytskoho. URL: http://meduniv.lviv.ua/files/press-centre/2014/n180414/evropejska_hartiya_prav_pacientiv.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Hutt L. E. (1998). Freebies for Subject 641: A Discussion of the Ethical Prospect of Providing Drug Trial Subjects with Post-Trial Access to the Drug Tested – A Canadian Perspective. Health Law Journal. Vol. 6, 169-187. URL: http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/hthlj6&div=11&id=&page=.
Post-Trial Responsibilities Guidance Document. MRCT Center. (2017). URL: http://mrctcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2017-06-28-Post-Trial-Responsibilities-Guidance-Document-Version-1.1.pdf.
Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. World Medical Association. JAMA. (2013). 310(20), 2191–2194. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001%2Fjama.2013.281053.
International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. CIOMS. (2003). URL: https://cioms.ch/shop/product/international-ethical-guidelines-for-biomedical-research-involving-human-subjects-2/.
The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations. (2004). №1031 URL: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/1031/made.
Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku provedennia klinichnykh vyprobuvan likarskykh zasobiv ta ekspertyzy materialiv klinichnykh vyprobuvan i Typovoho polozhennia pro komisii z pytan etyky : Nakaz Ministerstva okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy vid 23.09.2009 №690 (2009) URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1010-09.
Regulation (EU) №536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014. (2014) URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/536/oj.
Schlemper B. R., Albuquerque A. (2016). Post-trial access to medication: An approach based on different knowledge. O Mundo da Saúde. 40(4), 498-508. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15343/0104-7809.20164004498508.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Dmytro Lurye
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.