Conceptual bases of the development of the Directorate of UPR: discussions on the parliamentary and soviet authorities models

Authors

  • Світлана Леонідівна Гоцуляк кафедра історії держави і права України та зарубіжних країн Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4562-6210
  • Юрій Дмитрович Древаль Національний університет цивільного захисту України, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-9433

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.140.122309

Keywords:

Directory of the Ukrainian People’s Republic, Ukrainian statehood, Ukrainian state-building, modality, Ukrainian parliamentarism

Abstract

The article considered the issue that Ukrainian statehood existed in conditions of total political instability. The lack of a Directorate’s clear vision of the prospects for development and a corresponding political program, as the headquarters of the UNR, has become a catalyst for political struggle. The search for the best state model lasted throughout the time of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917–1921. At first (the beginning of the Ukrainian Central Rada’s work) there were discussed the forms of government that have been already tested in the then advanced countries, such as parliamentary and presidential republics.

In conclusions it was indicated that Ukrainian politicians unanimously supported democratic values and parliamentary system at the initial stage of the revolution. Only after a while, under the influence of a number of domestic political and foreign policy factors, an alternative has grown, which, during the period of the Directory, got the character of a tough confrontation. However, even in complicated military-political conditions, it continued to defend the ideas of constitutionalism, parliamentarism and the division of branches of power.

Author Biographies

Світлана Леонідівна Гоцуляк, кафедра історії держави і права України та зарубіжних країн Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

кандидат юридичних наук

 

Юрій Дмитрович Древаль, Національний університет цивільного захисту України

доктор наук з державного управління,

професор кафедри охорони праці та техногенної безпеки

 

 

References

Ianevskyi, D.B. (2009). Zahublena istoriia vtrachenoi derzhavy. Kharkiv: Folio [in Ukrainian].

Vynnychenko, V. (1990). Vidrodzhennia natsii: U 3-kh ch. Ch. 3. Kyiv: Viden [in Ukrainian].

Kopylenko, O., Kopylenko, M. (1996). «Druha» UNR: sproba istoryko-teoretychnoho analizu. Pravo Ukrainy, 8, 5460 [in Ukrainian].

Shapoval, M. (1927). Velyka revoliutsiia i ukrainska vyzvolna prohrama. Praha: druk. «Vilna spilka» [in Ukrainian].

Bevz, T.A. (2008). Partiia sotsialnykh perspektyv i natsionalnykh interesiv (Politychna istoriia UPSR). Kyiv: IPiEND imeni I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Dyrektoriia, Rada Narodnykh Ministriv Ukrainskoi Narodnoi Respubliky. Lystopad 1918. – lystopad 1920 pp.: dokumenty i materialy. (2006). (Vols. 1–2; Vol. 2) 3-kh ch. Uporiad.: V. Verstiuk (kerivnyk) ta in. Kyiv: Vyd-vo im. Oleny Telihy [in Ukrainian].

Ukrainske derzhavotvorennia: nevytrebuvanyi potentsial: slovnyk-dovidnyk. (1997). Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Hunchak, T. (1993). Ukraina: persha polovyna KhKh stolittia. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Kuchabskyi, V. (1969). Korpus Sichovykh Striltsiv Voienno-istorychnyi narys. Chikago: Drukarnia Mykoly Denysiuka [in Ukrainian].

Stopchak, M.V. (2013). Diialnist Dyrektorii UNR zi stvorennia konstytutsiino-pravovykh zasad ukrainskoi derzhavnosti v ukrainskii zarubizhnii istoriohrafii. Chornomorskyi litopys. Mykolaiv, issue 7, 133–140 [in Ukrainian].

Mazepa, I. (1951). Ukraina v ohni i buri revoliutsii, 1917–1921. U 3 ch. Ch. 2. Kam’ianetska doba – Zymovyi pokhid. Miunkhen: Prometei [in Ukrainian].

Mazepa, I. (1951). Ukraina v ohni i buri revoliutsii, 1917–1921. U 3 ch. Ch. 3. Polsko-ukrainskyi soiuz. Kinets zbroinykh zmahan UNR. Miunkhen: Prometei [in Ukrainian].

Terliuk, I.Ia. (2015). Ukrainskyi orhanichnyi konstytutsionalizm: doba «Druhoi» UNR. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Yurydychni nauky. Lviv, 827, 246–251 [in Ukrainian].

Turchyn, Ia.B. (2010). Osnovni elementy mekhanizmu strymuvan i protyvah u systemi derzhavnoi vlady u konstytutsiinomu proekti UNR Otto Eikhelmana. Derzhavne upravlinnia. Politolohiia. Mykolaiv: Vyd-vo ChDU im.PetraMohyly, Vol. 125, Issue 112, 94–99 [in Ukrainian].

Prysiazhniuk, A.I. (2007). Konstytutsiinyi proekt O. Koptsiukha ta yoho rol u derzhavnomu budivnytstvi v UNR doby Dyrektorii (istoryko-iurydychnyi analiz). Uchenыe zapysky Tavrycheskoho natsyonalnoho unyversyteta ym. V. Y. Vernadskoho. Yurydycheskye nauky. Symferopol, Vol. 20 (59), 2, 56–63 [in Ukrainian].

Dreval, Iu.D. (2003). Parlamentaryzm u politychnii systemi Ukrainy (polityko-pravovyi analiz). Kharkiv: NUVS [in Ukrainian].

Published

2018-03-12

How to Cite

Гоцуляк, С. Л., & Древаль, Ю. Д. (2018). Conceptual bases of the development of the Directorate of UPR: discussions on the parliamentary and soviet authorities models. Problems of Legality, (140), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.140.122309

Issue

Section

THEORY AND HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW