Temporal effect of decisions on judicial review of legislation in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.137.98701Keywords:
temporal effect of judgment, judicial review, retroactivity, prospectivityAbstract
The author has analyzed the temporal effect of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and administrative courts of Ukraine on judicial review of legislation. It is proposed to consider the direction of temporal effect in two aspects: firstly, as the definition of the past, current or future date, starting from which the unlawful legislation ceases to be effective; and secondly, as the effect of the decision on facts, legal rights and obligations, depending on their location in time with respect to the date of entry force of the corresponding decision. It is noted that in these cases the temporal scope of effect of a judgment correlated with the one of temporal effect of acts which ceases to be effective on their basis. The analysis of national legislation and practices has proved that the judicial review decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine have mainly immediate or prospective effect and only in some cases retroactive effect; similar decisions of administrative courts are retroactive in a wider range of cases. The research highlights some defects of domestic legal regulation of the abovementioned issues.
References
Bakhrakh, D.N. (2004). Dejstvie norm prava vo vremeni: Teoriia, zakonodatelstvo, sudebnaia praktika. Moscow: Norma [in Russian].
Tille, A.A. (1965). Vremja, prostranstvo, zakon. Dejstvie sovetskogo zakona vo vremeni i prostranstve. Moscow: Jurid. lit. [in Russian].
Barabash, Iu. (2010). Preiudytsialnist rishen Konstytutsijnoho Sudu Ukrainy: problemni pytannia teorii ta praktyky. Pravo Ukrainy, 6, 45–53 [in Ukrainian].
Teslenko, M.V. (2001). Sudebnyj konstitucionnyj kontrol v Ukraine. Kyiv: In-t gosudarstva i prava imeni V. M. Koreckogo NANU [in Russian].
Shevchuk, S. (2007). Sudova pravotvorchist: svitovyj dosvid i perspektyvy v Ukraini. Kyiv: Referat [in Ukrainian].
Anakina, T.M. (2008). Sudovyi pretsedent u pravi Ievropejskoho Soiuzu. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv: NYuAU im. Yaroslava Mudroho [in Ukrainian].
Khrystova, H.O. (2004). Iurydychna pryroda aktiv Konstytutsijnoho Sudu Ukrainy. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv: NYuAU im. Yaroslava Mudroho [in Ukrainian].
Belianevych, V.E. (2001). Do pytannia pro moment vyznannia nedijsnymy normatyvnykh aktiv derzhavnykh ta inshykh orhaniv. Visnyk hospodarskoho sudochynstva, 3, 207–211 [in Ukrainian].
Miroshnychenko, A.M. Pravovi naslidky nezakonnykh administratyvnykh aktiv. URL: http://bit.ly/1FQ7iZh [in Ukrainian].
Martseliak, O.V., Todyka, Iu.M. (1998). Konstytutsiinyi Sud Ukrainy i prokuratura v konstytutsiino-pravovomu mekhanizmi zabezpechennia osnovnykh prav hromadian. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Tykhyi, V. (2001). Diia rishen Konstytutsijnoho Sudu Ukrainy v chasi. Visnyk Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy, 5, 51–53 [in Ukrainian].
Savchak, A.V. (2011). Preiudytsialnist rishen Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy: teoretychno-pravovyi aspekt. Publichne pravo, 2, 27–32 [in Ukrainian].
Lasko, I.M. (2013). Pytannia vykonannia rishen Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy ta vyznannia normatyvno-pravovoho akta v sferi sotsialnoho zabezpechennia nekonstytutsiinym. Sudova apeliatsiia, 2 (31), 19–24 [in Ukrainian].
Pohrebniak, S.P. (2008). Osnovopolozhni pryntsypy prava (zmistovna kharakterystyka). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Uvarova, O. (2013). Pravovyi kharakter aktiv normotvorchosti iak zaperechuvana prezumptsiia prava. Antropolohiia prava: filosofskyj ta iurydychnyj vymiry (stan, problemy, perspektyvy): statti uchasnykiv vosmoho Mizhnarodnoho «kruhloho stolu» (m. Lviv, 7–8 hrudnia 2012 roku). – Lviv: Halytskyj drukar, 514–532 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Олексій Пушняк
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
