The use of legal scholarship by the courts of Ukraine

Igor Victorovych Semenihin

Abstract


The specific features of the use of legal scholarship by the courts of Ukraine have been analyzed in the paper. The reasons of lack of the established practice of scholarly writings citation in court decisions have been considered.


Keywords


citation practice; judicial opinion; judicial decision; legal doctrine; legal scholarship

Full Text:

PDF

References


Vasiliev, A.A. (2009) Pravovaja doktrina: voprosy teorii i istorii [The legal doctrine: theoretical and historical questions]. Moscow: Jurlitinform [in Russian].

David R., Zhoffre-Spinozi, K. (2009). Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti [Major Legal Systems in the World Today]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija [in Russian].

Emelin, M.Ju. (2015). Pravovaja doktrina v sisteme istochnikov obshhego prava: na osnove analiza pravovoj sistemy Soedinennyh Shtatov Ameriki [The legal doctrine in the system of legal sources of common law: based on analysis of the United States legal system]. Penza [in Russian].

Maksymov, S.I. (2013). Pravova doktryna: filosofs’ko-pravovyj pidkhid [Legal doctrine: philisophical and legal approach]. Pravo Ukrainy [Law of Ukraine]. Is. 9, pp. 32–54 [in Ukrainian].

Poljakov, S.B. (2014). Juridicheskaja nauka, praktika, politika [Legal science, legal practice, state policy]. Lex russica. Is. 4, pp. 413–420 [in Russian].

Puzikov, R.V. (2003) Juridicheskaja doktrina v sfere pravovogo regulirovanija (problemy teorii i praktiki) [The legal doctrine in the sphere of legal regulations: theoretical and practical problems]. Tambov [in Russian].

Sadohina, N.E. (2005). Razvitie istochnikov rossijskogo prava v sovetskij i postsovetskij period [Evolution of legal sources of Russian law in Soviet and post-Soviet periods]. Tambov [in Russian].

Liptak, A. (2007). When rendering decision, judges are finding law reviews irrelevant. New York Times, 19.

Рetherbridge, L., Schwartz, D. (2012). An Empirical Assessment of The Supreme Court’s Use of Legal Scholarship. Northwestern University Law Review. Vol. 106, pp. 995–1032.

Schauer, F. (2008). Authority and Authorities. Virginia Law Review. Vol. 94, pp. 1931–1961.

Shecaira, F. (2011). Legal scholarship as a source of law. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Hamilton: McMaster University.

Stanton, K. (2011). Use of Scholarship by the House of Lords in tort cases. From House of Lords to Supreme Court / еd. by J. Lee. Oxford : Hart Publishing, pp. 201–226.


GOST Style Citations


  1. Васильев А. А. Правовая доктрина: вопросы теории и истории / А. А. Васильев. – Москва :
    Юрлитинформ, 2009. – 272 с.
  2. Давид Р. Основные правовые системы современности современности / Р. Давид, К. Жоффре-Спиннози ; пер. с фр. В. А. Туманова. – Москва : Междунар. отношения, 2009. – 456 с.
  3. Емелин М. Ю. Правовая доктрина в системе источников общего права: на основе анализа правовой системы Соединенных Штатов Америки : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.01 / Михаил Юрьевич Емелин ; Пензенский гос. ун-т. – Пенза, 2015. – 201 с.
  4. Максимов С. І. Правова доктрина: філософсько-правовий підхід / С. І. Максимов // Право України. – 2013. – № 9. – С. 43–54.
  5. Поляков С. Б. Юридическая наука, практика, политика / С. Б. Поляков // Lex russica. – 2014. – № 4. – С. 413–420.
  6. Пузиков Р. В. Юридическая доктрина в сфере правового регулирования (проблемы теории и практики) : дис. … канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.01 / Руслан Владимирович Пузиков ; Тамбов. гос. ун-т. – Тамбов, 2003. – 213 c.
  7. Садохина Н. Е. Развитие источников российского права в советский и постсоветский период : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.01 / Наталия Евгеньевна Садохина ;  Тамбов. гос. ун-т. – Тамбов, 2005. – 186 с. 
  8. Liptak, A. When rendering decision, judges are finding law reviews irrelevant / А. Liptak // New York Times. – 2007. – № 19.
  9. Рetherbridge, L. An Empirical Assessment of The Supreme Court’s Use of Legal Scholarship / L. Рetherbridge, D. Schwartz // Northwestern University Law Review. – 2012. – Vol. 106. – P. 995–1032.
  10. Schauer, F. Authority and Authorities / F. Schauer // Virginia Law Review. – 2008. – Vol. 94. – Р. 1931–1961.
  11. Shecaira, F. Legal scholarship as a source of law : a thesis … for the degree of doctor of philosophy / F. Shecaira ; McMaster University. – Hamilton. – 2011. – 157 р.
  12. Stanton, K. Use of Scholarship by the House of Lords in tort cases / K. Stanton // From House of Lords to Supreme Court / еd. by J. Lee. – Oxford. : Hart Publishing, 2011. – P. 201–226.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.134.78782

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 Ігор Вікторович Семеніхін

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2224-9281