The rule of law in lawmaking activity of executive bodies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.134.78655

Keywords:

rulemaking, the principles of law-making, executive power, the rule of law

Abstract

Rule-making activity of executive power, its concept, content regulation is one of the pressing problems in Ukraine, despite a considerable amount of theoretical research, leaving open the question of legislative regulation and practical implementation of the legislative process in general and the executive authorities in particular.

The article aims to determine where the rule of law in the rule-making activity of executive power in Ukraine by analyzing scientific approaches to these issues.

The most important principle, which now can be attributed to the fundamental principles of modern law-making activities of the executive is the rule of law.

The rule of law is a basic and irrefutable principle that should guide the executive authorities in the exercise of legislative activity to develop the most sophisticated in content of subordinate legal act. Respect for the rule of law in lawmaking activity of executive bodies is an indicator of proper implementation and protection of rights, freedoms and interests of man and citizen. The rule of law implies not only the recognition of fundamental human rights, but also bound to ensure compliance and by authorized public authorities, especially the executive branch.

Author Biography

Є. А. Гетьман, The National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Law Sciences,
Senior Research,
Head of Coordination of Law Studies
staff of the National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine

References

Chepulchenko, T.O. (2012). Verkhovenstvo prava yak osnovopolozhnyi pryntsyp suchasnoho pravotvorennia. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrainy «Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut». Politolohiia. Sotsiolohiia. Pravo, 3, 185–188 [in Ukrainian].

Honcharenko, V.H. (2007). Pryntsyp naukovosti yak metodolohiia yurydychnoho normotvorennia. Visnyk Akademii advokatury Ukrainy, issue 3, 32–44 [in Ukrainian].

Pohrebniak, S. (2000). Rol pryntsypu verkhovenstva zakonu dlia podolannia iierarkhichnykh kolizii. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 4/23, 247–259 [in Ukrainian].

Tomkina, O.O. (2004). Pryntsyp hlasnosti protsedury pryiniattia pravovykh aktiv Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy. Pravo Ukrainy, 9, 28–31 [in Ukrainian].

Chapliuk, O.I. (2010). Zahalni ta spetsialni pryntsypy natsionalnoi pravotvorchosti: poniattia, znachennia ta vydy. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, 1, 87–93 [in Ukrainian].

Pro zasady derzhavnoi rehuliatornoi polityky u sferi hospodarskoi diialnosti: Zakon Ukrainy vid 11.09.2003 № 1160-IV. (2004). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 9, article 79 [in Ukrainian].

Khrystynchenko, N.P. (2010). Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia derzhavnoho upravlinnia normotvorchoiu diialnistiu. Visnyk Akademii upravlinnia MVS, 3 (15), 19–24 [in Ukrainian].

Pro zatverdzhennia Pravyl pidhotovky proektiv aktiv Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 06.09.2005 № 870. zakon4.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/870-2005-%D0%BF [in Ukrainian].

Kondyk, P.M. (2004). Rekomendatsii z pidhotovky proektiv aktiv Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy. Yurydychnyi zhurnal, 11, 31–35 [in Ukrainian].

Arzamasov, Yu.H. (Eds.). (2007). Normohrafyia: teoryia y metodolohyia normotvorchestva: nauchno-metodycheskoe y uchebnoe posobye. Moscow: Akademycheskyi Proekt [in Russian].

Plavych, V.P. (2012). Zasadnychi pryntsypy pravotvorchoi diialnosti yak osnova yii efektyvnosti. Almanakh prava, issue 3, 83–87 [in Russian].

Vediernikov Yu.A. Teoriia derzhavy i prava : navch. posib. / Yu.A. Vediernikov, A.V. Papina. – K. : Znannia, 2008. [in Ukrainian].

Petryshyn, O.V. (Eds.). (2014). Teoriia derzhavy i prava: pidruchnyk. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Petryshyn, O.V. (2009). Verkhovenstvo prava v systemi dii prava. Problemy zakonnosti, issue 100, 18–30 [in Ukrainian].

Holovatyi, S.P. (2011). Konstytutsiia Ukrainy. Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar. (2th ed.). V.Ia. Tatsii, O.V. Petryshyn, Yu.H. Barabash et al. (Ed.); Nats. akad. prav. nauk Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Pro zastosuvannia Konstytutsii Ukrainy pry zdiisnenni pravosuddia: Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho sudu Ukrainy vid 01.11.1996 № 9 (1996). zakon3.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0009700-96 [in Ukrainian].

Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy polozhen statti 69 Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy (sprava pro pryznachennia sudom bilsh miakoho pokarannia) vid 02.11.2004 № 15-rp/2004 (2004). zakon5.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v015p710-04 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2016-09-29

How to Cite

Гетьман, Є. А. (2016). The rule of law in lawmaking activity of executive bodies. Problems of Legality, (134), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.134.78655

Issue

Section

Administrative law. Financial law. Labor law