Subject description form of crime prevention (morphological analysis)

Abstract

Activities of the National Crime Prevention is a system object. Therefore, it should be improving on the basis of systems analysis techniques.

The practice of systematic approach was realized in the works of  N. F. Kuznetsova, A. I. Dolgova, D. O. Li, V. M. Dryomin, O. Y. Manokha, O. G. Frolova. Crime models developed C. Y. Vitsin, Y. D. Bluvshteyn, N. V. Smetanina.

We previously disclosed basic principles of system analysis system to prevent crime and its genetic and prognostic aspects, classification features, systemic factors latentyzatsiyi criminogenic factors - object protective activity, the amount of protected public relations.

In order to investigate the systemic properties of the system of crime prevention in Ukraine we have defined objectives of the study - to its morphological analysis.

Elements of a specialized system of crime prevention - a prosecution, Interior, Security Service, the Military Service of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, bodies of state border protection agencies revenues and fees, enforcement and penal institutions, remand centers, public financial control, fisheries, the state forest protection.

We determined depth analysis of your system functions at the level of law enforcement agencies.

Intercom system to prevent crime is information links between elements of the system (transfer of information on crimes and criminals current activity).

External relations systems provide processes of interaction with the environment. For crime prevention system external relations are relations of elements (law enforcement) society.

In the system of crime prevention implemented such coordination links:

1) Departmental coordination meeting of law enforcement agencies;

2) inter-agency coordination meeting of law enforcement agencies (Prosecutor General of Ukraine, the State Border Service of Ukraine and others.)

3) mutual exchange of information;

4) order the prosecution, SBU on other agencies to perform certain actions;

5) joint planning and implementation of measures to prevent crime.

Subkoordynatsiyni relations of subordination implemented within the hierarchical structure of law enforcement agencies.

The material deepens knowledge of elemental composition and structure of crime prevention in Ukraine. At the same time it is an information base for modeling.

We can argue about the newness of the data. But these data are primary, because this study is limited overhead (departmental) level structure of crime prevention. While they, together with earlier practices is the basis for modeling the system.