Jurisprudence as phronetic experience: formulation of the problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.133.70912Keywords:
jurisprudence, phronesis, phronetic science, experience, hermeneutical philosophy of law.Abstract
The article is devoted to reactualization of Aristotelian idea of phronesis (practical wisdom as the capacity of situational judgment) in the framework of hermeneutical philosophy (M. Heidegger, G.-G. Gadamer, P. Ricoeur, F.-J. Mootz III, J. Tontti) and critical direction «phronetic social sciences» (B. Flyvbjerg) in order to clarify the nature of jurisprudence. Instead of the usual concepts of «theory», «science», «knowledge», – the author proposes to use the concept of experience, in particular legal experience to describe the jurisprudence. Last is thought of as an holistic human experience, which covers both interpretation of law (theory), reproduction of law (poezis) and its application (praxis) and can not be reduced neither to science nor to technology.
References
Gusserl, E. (1986). Krizis evropejskogo chelovechestva i filosofija [The crisis of European humanity and philosophy ]. Voprosy filosofii – Issues of philosophy, 3, 101–116 [іn Russian].
Mikeshina, L.A. (2009). Filosofija poznanija. Problemy jepistemologii gumanitarnogo znanija [Philosophy of knowledge. Problems of epistemology of the humanities]. Moscow: «Kanon+», ROOI «Reabilitacija» [іn Russian].
Maksimov, S.I., Permyakov, Y.E., Polyakov, A.V., Stovba, A.V., Chestnov, I.I., & Chetvernin, V.A. (2013). Neklassicheskaja filosofija prava: voprosy i otvety [Nonclassical philosophy of law: questions and answers]. Kharkov: Library of international journal «Problems of Philosophy of Law» [іn Russian].
Labarriere, Zh.-L. (2009). Fronesis. European Dictionary of Philosophies. Lexicon of Untranslatable. Kyiv: DUH І LІTERA [іn Ukrainian].
Aristotle (1983). Nicomachean ethics. General Works. Moskow: Think [іn Russian].
Kelsen, G. (2004). Chiste Pravoznavstvo [Pure Theory of Law]. Kyiv: Junіvers [іn Ukrainian].
Amselek, P. (2013). Scientific status of legal research. Encyclopedia of Law and the Integral Jurisprudence. Moskow: Norm [іn Russian].
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge University Press.
Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., & Schram, S. (2012). Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2006). Bytie i vremja [Being and time]. St.Petersburg: Science [In Russian].
Gadamer, H.-G. (1998) Praise of Theory: Speeches and Essays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2010). Put' priznanija. Tri ocherka [The way of recognition. Three essay]. Moskow: Russian political encyclopedia [іn Russian].
Ricoeur, P. (2010). Spravedlivoe [Fair]. Moskow: Gnozis, Logos [іn Russian].
Arendt, H. (2013). Otvetstvennost' i suzhdenie [Responsibility and Judgment]. Moskow: Gajdar Institute Publishing [іn Russian].
Tontti, J. (2004). Right and Rrejudice: Rrolegomena to a Hermeneutical Philosophy of Law. Burlington: Ashgate.
Mootz, F.-J. III. (2010). Law, Hermeneutics and Rhetoric. Burlington Ashgate.
Kant, I. (2007). Metafizika nravov [The Mataphysics of Morals]. St.Petersburg: Science [іn Russian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Natalia Ivanivna Satokhina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
