Optimization of tactical decisions: subjective and objective conditionality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.133.70650Keywords:
tactical decision, human factors of optimization, objective factors of optimization, psychological traps, optimization of tactical decisions.Abstract
In the article «human» and «objective» factors are investigated that influencing on optimization of tactical decisions. Attention is accented on dependence of the got information about the circumstances of crime from the acceptance of correct decisions an investigator. Connection between efficiency of investigation and acceptance of optimal tactical decisions is underlined.
The declared problem is not investigational in literature in a sufficient measure. Its separate aspects found the reflection in works: D. А. Solodova, S. Yu. Yakushina and others. Some questions related to optimization of investigation and making decision an investigator we discover in works: R. S. Belkin, V. А. Juravel, V. Е. Konovalova, V. L. Sinchuk, B. V. Shur, V. Yu. Shepitko.
The aim of the article is determination of term «optimization», as it applies to tactical decisions in criminalistics, and also consideration of influence of human and objective factors on the acceptance of optimal decisions at investigation of crimes.
In the article etymology of term is considered «optimization» and interpretation of its is given as it applies to the acceptance of tactical decisions. The types of mark human and objective factors, stipulating optimization of tactical decisions. The last assists efficiency of tactics of investigation of crimes.
At consideration of «human factors» of influencing on optimization decisions, attention applies on «psychological traps» can take place at making decision. Among them such are named, as: anchoring; status quo; irreversible expenses; desired and actual; incorrect formulation; conceit; reinsurance; constancy of memory. Underlined, absence of unambiguity in the brought list over of «objective factors» influencing at choice tactical decision. The different understanding of «tactical risk» is argued, as a factor influencing on an acceptance tactical decisions.
The analysis of «human» and «objective» factors influencing on the acceptance of optimal tactical decisions allows drawing conclusion about their interconditionality, in the process of their estimation carried out by an investigator. In practice of investigation, knowledge of the adopted factors can assist being of optimal tactical decisions.
References
Borysov, A.B. (2003). Bol’shoj ekonomycheskyj slovar’ [Big economic dictionary]. Moskva: Knyzhnyj myr. Retrieved from : https://tochka.com /info/glossary /?srch [in Russian].
Vasyl’ev, V.L. (2008). Yurydycheskaia psykholohyia: uchebnyk [Legal psychology: a textbook]. Sankt Peterburh : Pyter [in Russian].
Velykanov, S.V. (2000). Sledstvennaia sytuatsyia y pryniatye sledstvennoho reshenyia [Investigating the situation and making investigative decisions]. Problemy zakonnosti, 41, 217–222 [in Ukrainian].
Dyev, V.S. (2008). Fylosofskaia paradyhma ryska [The philosophical paradigm of risk]. EKO, Vserossyjskyj ekonomycheskyj zhurnal, 12, 27–38 [in Russian].
Drapkyn, L. (2014). Ya Sytuatsyy taktycheskoho ryska: poniatye, struktury, metody preodolenyia [Situation tactical risk: concept, structure, methods of overcoming]. Voprosy sledstvennoj y operatyvno-rozysknoj deiatel’nosty. Elektronnoe prylozhenye k Rossyjskomu iurydycheskomu zhurnalu, 6, 23–33 [in Russian].
Yhnatov, S.D. (2014). Trebovanyia, pred’iavliaemye k lychnosty sledovatelia [Requirements to the personality of the investigator]. Vestnyk Udmurtskoho unyversyteta, 2, 133–141 [in Russian].
Kniaz’kov, A.S. (2011). Taktycheskyj rysk y taktycheskaia oshybka: problemy sootnoshenyia [Tactical risk tactical error: problems ratio]. Vestnyk Omskoho unyversyteta. Seryia Pravo, 3 (28), 169–175 [in Russian].
Panfylova, E.A. (2010). Poniatye ryska: mnohoobrazye podkhodov y opredelenyj [The concept of risk: diversity of approaches and definitions]. Teoryia y praktyka obschestvennoho razvytyia, 4, 30–34 [in Russian].
Sovremennaia entsyklopedyia [Modern encyclopedia]. Retrieved from : http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc1p/34494 [in Russian].
Solov’eva, N.A. (2011). Sootnoshenye taktycheskoho ryska y konflyktnoj sytuatsyy pry rassledovanyy nasyl’stvennykh prestuplenyj, sovershennykh zhenschynamy [The ratio of risk and tactical conflict situations in the investigation of violent crimes committed by women]. Vestnyk Volhohradskoho hosudarstvennoho un-ta. Seryia 5, 2 (15), 159–162 [in Russian].
Solodov, D.A. (2003). Protsessual’nye y taktycheskye reshenyia sledovatelia (suschnost’, problemy optymyzatsyy pryniatyia) [Procedural and tactical decisions of the investigator (essence, optimization problems of adoption)]. Dys … kand. iuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Voronezh [in Russian].
Khalpern, D. (2000). Psykholohyia krytycheskoho myshlenyia [Psychology critical thinking]. (N. Mal’hyna, S. Rysev, L. Tsaruk, Trans). St.-Peterburh: Pyter [in Russian].
Khemmond, D.S., & Kyny, R.L., & Rajffa, H. (2006). Skrytye lovushky protsessa pryniatyia reshenyia [Hidden traps of decision making process]. Effektyvnoe pryniatye reshenyj. (S. Druzhchenko, Trans). Moskva : Al’pyna Byznes Buks, 136–158 [in Russian].
Shuklyn, A.E. (2012). Osobennosty pryniatyia ynformatsyonnykh y taktycheskykh reshenyj v slozhnykh sledstvennykh sytuatsyiakh [Features the adoption of information and tactical decisions in complex investigative situations]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Ekaterynburh [in Russian].
Yakushyn, S.Yu. (2013). Tekhnolohyia pryniatyia sledovatelem optymal’nykh taktycheskykh reshenyj [Technology adoption investigator optimal tactical decisions]. Uchenye zapysky Kazanskoho unyversyteta, 155, 4, 245–254 [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Олег Юрійович Булулуков
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
