Sharia Business and The Challenge of Dispute Settlement in Indonesian Religious Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.133.70649Keywords:
Sharia Economy, Сivil Procedural Law, Religion CourtAbstract
Sharia economy is not new in the world of Islam. Development of sharia economic law in Indonesia begins with the emergence of islamic banking. The development of national and international economy that always moves quickly along with more wider challenges, should always be followed in responsively by national banking in carrying its functions and responsibilities out to the community. According to the sharia banking law in order to be categorized in the scope of islamic economics, it is determined by the fatwa of the Indonesian Ulama Council. This is due to the MUI as an institution that has the authority in the field of religion and related to the interest of Indonesian muslims. One thing that is interesting from the proliferation of business activities with Sharia principles is about its pattern of settlement of disputes is related with Religion Court jurisdiction. Religion Court is an institution that has authority to examine dispute settlement of sharia economy case in Indonesia. However, the law of civil procedure used in the Religious Court is still referring to procedureal law in the general court which is much criticized, because its complicated procedures and take a long time so it’s been very expensive. Based on the analysis, the development of sharia economic system is basically the demands of the business world, which has the fast-moving character, however, development of sharia economy of which is not accompanied with its own substance of law, especially the procedural law that works to resolve disputes, so that, on its turn, it will lead to the obstacle for the sharia economic development itself, in which the condition is contrary to the principle of simple justice, quick and low cost as stipulated in the provisions of Article 2 (4) of Law No. 48 Year 2009 on Judicial.References
Afandi, Dedi. (2009). Mediasi: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis. Majalah KedokteranIndonesia, Vol. 59 No. 5, May.Jakarta: IDI.
Antonio, Muhammad Syafi’i. (2006). Membangun Ekonomi Islam di Indonesia. Varia Peradilan. Year XXI No. 245, April.Jakarta: IKAHI.
Bandung, Pengadilan Tinggi. Laporan Court Quality Forum,Bandung: Pengadilan TinggiBandung.
Bintoro, Rahadi Wasi. Implementasi Mediasi Litigasi di yurisdiksi Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol 14, No. 1. Purwokerto: Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.
Bintoro, Rahadi Wasi. Tuntutan Hak Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 10, No. 2. Purwokerto: Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.
Faisal, Liky. (2013). Politik Ekonomi Islam Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Nasional Di Indonesia. Jurnal Asas, Vol 5 No. 2. Lampung: IAIN Raden Indtan.
Harahap, M. Yahya. (1997). Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa.Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Harahap, M. Yahya. (2007). Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan.Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hasnita, Nevi. (2012). Politik Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah DiIndonesia. Legitimasi, Vol. 1, No. 2, January-June. Banda Aceh: Fakulty of Sharia IAIN Ar-Raniry.
Hatta, Ali. (2012). Peradilan Sederhana,. Cepat dan Biaya Ringan Menuju Keadilan Restoratif.Bandung: Alumni.
Khisni. (2011). Peradilan Agama Sebagai Peradilan Keluarga serta Perkembangan Studi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Vol. XXV No. 1, April.Semarang: Unisula.
Khopiatuziadah. (2013). Kajian Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Legislasi, Vol. 10 No. 3, September.Jakarta: DJPP Kemenkum HAM.
Komariah. (2012). Analisis Yuridis PerMA No. 1 Tahun 2008 tentang Pelaksanaan Mediasi di Pengadilan sebagai Faktor yang mempengaruhi Efektivitas Proses Mediasi. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, Vol. 20 No. 2.Malang: Faculty of Law Universitas MuhammadiyahMalang.
Lindsey, Tim. (2012). Between Piety and Prudence: State Syariah and the Regulation of Islamic Banking inIndonesia. Sydney Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 107.Sydney:SydneyLawSchool-theUniversityofSydney.
Manan, Abdul. (2008). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama.Jakarta: Kencana.
Mansyur, Ali. (2011). Aspek Hukum Perbankan Syariah dan Implementasinya di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 11: Special Edition. Purwokerto: Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.
Margono, Sayud. (2000). ADR dan Arbitrase. Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum.Jakarta: GhaliaIndonesia.
Matrais, Sumadi. (2008). Kemandirian Peradilan Agama Dalam Perspektif Undang-undang Peradilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 15, No. 1, January.Yogyakarta: UII.
McIntosh, Wayne. (1980-1981). 150 Years of Litigation and Dispute Settlement: A Court Tale. Law and Society Review, Vol. 15, No. 3/4. web http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3053513?sid=21105730658653&uid=3738224 &uid=4&uid=2 accessed on January 28th 2015.
Mufidi, Faiz, Pursetyowati, Sri. (2009). Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik di Rumah Sakit. Wacana Paramarta, Vol. 8 No. 1.Bandung: Faculty of Law Universitas Langlangbuana.
Muryati Dewi Tuti, Heryanti, B. Rini. (2011). Pengaturan dan Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Nonlitigasi di Bidang Perdagangan. Jurnal Dinamika Sosbud, Vol. 3, No. 1, June.Semarang: Universitas Semarang.
Nazriyah, Riri. (2002). Peranan Cita Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 20, No. 9, June.Yogyakarta: UII.
Ningrum, Gusti Ayu Dian, dkk. (2012). Penyelesaian Sengketa melalui Mediasi oleh Para Pihak di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar dalam perkara Perdata. Kertha Wicara, Vol. 1 No. 1. Badung: Universitas Udayana.
Nugroho, Hibnu. (2008). Paradigma Penegakan HukumIndonesiaDalam Era Global. Jurnal Pro Justitia, Vol. 26, No. 4, Oktober.Bandung: Faculty of Law Universitas Parahyangan.
Penyusun, Tim. (1990). Kamus Besar BahasaIndonesia.Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Rangkuti, Ramlan Yusuf. (2011). Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Islam: Instrumen Penting bagi Konsep Ekonomi Islam Mendatang. Asy-Syir’ah-Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum, Vol. 45, No. 2, July-Desember.Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Reitzel, J. David. (1990). Contemporary Business law, Principle and Case.ForthEdition.New York City: MC. Graw Hill Pub. Comp.
Riama, Novita. (2013). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Implementasi Asas Peradilan Sederhana. Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 3.Pontianak: Universitas Tanjungpura.
Rismawati, Shinta Dewi dkk. (2012). Hakim dan Mediasi: Pemaknaan Hakim Terhadap Mediasi Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Pekalongan. Jurnal Penelitian, Vol. 9, No. 2, November. Pekalongan: STAIN Pekalongan.
Rosyadi, Rahmat and Ngatino. (2002). Arbitrase dalam Perspektif Islam dan Hukum Positif.Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sofiani, Triana. (2010). Efektivitas Mediasi Perkara Perceraian Pasca PerMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2008 di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Penelitian, Vol. 7, No. 2, November. Pekalongan: STAIN Pekalongan.
Spencer, J.F. (1989).Jackson’s Machinery of Justice.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.
Superman, Eman. (2006). Perkembangan Doktrin Penyelesaian Sengketa di Indonesia. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 2, July,Bandung: Procedural Law Department Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran.
Wantu, Fence. M. (2012). Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum/ Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim di Peradilan Perdata/ Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 12 No. 3, September. Purwokerto: Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.
Widjaja, Gunawan. (2008). Seri Aspek Hukum Dalam Bisnis-Arbitrase VS Pengadilan-Persoalan Kompetensi (Absolut) yang Tidak Pernah Selesai.Jakarta: Kencana.
Zuhaili, Wahbah Az. (2007). Fiqih Islam Wa Adillatuhu-Jihad. Pengadilan dan mekanisme mengambil keputusan. Pemerintahan dalam Islam. Damaskus: Darul Fikr.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
