The penal aspect of the essence of the legal institute

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.132.63953

Keywords:

legal institute, subinstitute, interdisciplinary subinstitute of penal law

Abstract

Law, like any social phenomenon, can be the object of cognition only if legal norms that is its components, will come into connection with other legal norms, not only to form separate elements of the law.

Without a comprehensive study of the interaction between legal norms, their role in the regulation of social relations will be impossible to develop effective legal measures of influence on various spheres of public life. Unfortunately, proper attention to this issue in Ukraine is not given. Examined, in fact, a certain set of interconnected rules of law, but each of them, representing this population, is investigated separately, without necessary connection with other laws.

However, as presented in the legal literature, the research results confirmed the existence in law of such legal norms, which are involved in the regulation of certain social relations, being in its totality as an integrated whole. Such laws called legal institutions.

Legal institutions, subinstitutes and interdisciplinary subinstitutes of penal law, both from the point of view of legal terminology and from the point of view of defining the content, in domestic science remains thoroughly unexplored and only mentioned in some scientific works of foreign authors. The term “legal institution” is used by scholars more as a term authoritative sound. In this article, we first provide a definition of the legal Institute, subinstitute and cross-subinstitute of penal law, interpret the normative contents of the allocated inherent characteristics, focusing on the absence in domestic science studies on this issue.

Author Biographies

Олег Миколайович Кревсун, Інститут кримінально-виконавчої служби

здобувач

Євген Юхимович Бараш, Institute of penal service

Doctor of Law,  associate professor

References

Fylymonov, V.D., Fylymonov O.V. (2011). Ynstytut prava. Ynstytut uholovnoho prava. Ynstytut uholovno-yspolnytelnoho prava [Institute of Law. Institute of Criminal Law. Institute of Penitentiary Law]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].

Zhuk, M.S. (2011). Teoreticheskie osnovyi postroeniya sistemyi institutov rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava : monografiya [Theoretical bases of construction of system of the Russian criminal law institutions]. V.P. Konyahina (Ed.) [in Russian].

Tsvik, M.V., Petryshyn, O.V. (Eds.). (2009). Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava [The general theory of law]. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Levytska, N.O. (2012). Normatyvno-pravovyi instytut: rozmezhuvannia iz sumizhnymy poniattiamy [Normative-legal institution: the delimitation of adjacent concepts]. Chasopys Akademii advokatury Ukrainy – Journal of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine, 14, 1–5 [in Ukrainian].

Instytuty prava. Pidhaluzi prava (2015). [Institutions Law. Sector law]. pidruchniki.com. Retrived from: http://pidruchniki.com/1837081043115/pravo/instituti_prava_pidgaluz i_prava [in Ukrainian].

Marchenko, M.N. (Ed.). (2001). Obshchaia teoryia hosudarstva y prava. Akademycheskyi kurs [Obschaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskiy kurs]. (Vols 1-3; Vol 2). (2d ed.). Moskow: Zertsalo-M [in Russian].

Muzyka, A.A. (2015). Vidhuk ofitsiinoho oponenta doktora yurydychnykh nauk, profesora na dysertatsiiu Muratovoi Svitlany Oleksandrivny «Sudymist v systemi instytutiv Zahalnoi chastyny kryminalnoho prava Ukrainy» [Reviewed Official opponents Doctor of Law, Professor at the thesis Svetlana Muratova "Convictions are already Institute of Criminal Law of Ukraine"]. Kharkiv: Arkhiv naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu vyvchennia problem zlochynnosti imeni akademika V. V. Stashysa Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Puzyrov, M.S. (2012). Dyferentsiatsiia ta indyvidualizatsiia vykonannia pokarannia u vydi pozbavlennia voli na pevnyi strok [Differentiation and individualization of punishment of imprisonment for a specified period]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Hel, A.P. (2006). Zmina umov trymannia zasudzhenykh v mezhakh odniiei vypravnoi kolonii [Changing the conditions of prisoners in the same penitentiary]. Pidpryiemstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo – Enterprise, Economy and Law, 5 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2016-04-20

How to Cite

Кревсун, О. М., & Бараш, Є. Ю. (2016). The penal aspect of the essence of the legal institute. Problems of Legality, (132), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.132.63953

Issue

Section

Criminal and penitentiary law. Criminalistics