Court fee legal nature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.132.60840Keywords:
court costs, state duty, court fee, functions of court fee, public obligation, procedural obligationAbstract
In the article the author attempts to determine court fee legal nature He comes from that court fee is included in the composition of court costs. Consequently these concepts are correlated as part and unit. Thus part adopts signs characteristic from unit, saving the feature. Court costs are statutory expenses (monetary resources) of parties, other persons participating in the case, born by them in connection with it consideration and permission, and in case of their exemption are expenses of the state that it carries in connection with permission of certain case. They perform two functions: compensation to the participants of process their expenses related to consideration of the case, and stopping from illegal and unconscientious judicial behavior.
The author comes from that court fee is not the type of state duty, as these payments have different purviews. Court fee is paid only at an appeal to the court, and state duties - to another unjudicial organs. In addition, in the national legislation since 1 January 2006 both payments are examined as national taxes and collections.
Legal nature of court fee it is suggested to determine taking into account those functions that it executes. Firstly, due to court fee the special fund of the state budget is filled up. Its facilities go to financing the functioning of the judicial system. A person, paying it, executes his public obligation. Secondly, the payment of court fee prevents illegal judicial behavior, stimulates parties to the extra-judicial settlement of dispute. Paying court fee a person discharges duties, envisaged by a procedural legislation.
It is suggested to understand court fee as a payment to the budget that is realized for specific public and procedural obligations fulfillment due to person’s realization of his access to court for the legal defense right or due to person’s court decree according to Law of Ukraine “About Court fee”, the payment of which should entail some legally significant actions on this person as a receipt of “special benefit”. The last mentioned should appear during writ, application, claim examination and appropriate court decision taking by results, that is in judicature for the purpose of person’s rights, interests and freedoms protection.References
Pro derzhavne mito: Dekret Kabіnetu Mіnіstrіv Ukraїni vіd 21.01.1993 № 7-93 [About State Duty: Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 20 January 1993 № 7-93]. 1993. Vіdomostі Verhovnoї Radi Ukraїni, 13 (30.03.93), article 113 [In Ukrainian].
Pro sudovij zbіr: Zakon Ukraїni vіd 08.07.2011 № 3674-VI [About Court Fee: Law of Ukraine from 8 July 2011 № 3674-VI]. 2011. Ofіcіjnij vіsnik Ukraїni, 59 (12.08.2011), article 2349 [In Ukrainian].
Sovetskij grazhdanskij process: uchebnik [The Soviet Civil Process]. (2005). 2d ed. Moscow: YUrid. lit. [In Russian].
Grazhdanskoe processual’noe pravo Rossii: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Civil Procedural Law of Russian]. (2002). Moscow: YUrist [In Russian].
Civіl’nij procesual’nij kodeks Ukraїni: naukovo-praktichnij komentar [Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine: Research and Practice Comment]. (2001). Kharkov: Odіssej [In Ukrainian].
Shokueva, E.M. (2005). Institut sudebnyh raskhodov v rossijskom grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [The Institute of Court Costs in Russian Civil Proceeding]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Saratov [In Russian].
Boglya, S.S. (2005). Sudovі vtrati u civіl’nomu sudochinstvі [The Court Costs in Civil Proceeding]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkov [In Ukrainian].
Sovetskij grazhdanskij process [The Soviet Civil Process]. (1989). Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta [In Russian].
Grazhdanskij process: uchebnik [Civil Process]. (2004). 5d ed. Moscow: VoltersKluver [In Russian].
Bespalov, Yu.F. (2014). Sudebnye raskhody po grazhdanskim, ugolovnym delam i delam ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie [The Court Costs in Civil, Criminal Cases and Cases About Administrative Offences]. Moscow: Prospect [In Russian].
Simajtis, R. (2005). Funkcii grazhdansko-processual’nogo instituta sudebnyh raskhodov [Functions of Civil Procedure Institute of Court Costs]. Grazhdanskij process: nauka i prepodavanie. Moscow: Izdatel’skij Dom «Gorodec», 302-313 [In Russian].
Pro zabezpechennya prava na spravedlivij sud: Zakon Ukraїni vіd 12.02.2015 № 192-VIII [On Ensuring the Right to a Fair Trial: Law of Ukraine from 12 February 2015 № 192-VIII]. (2015). Ofіcіjnij vіsnik Ukraїni, 17 (10.03.2015), article 447 [In Ukrainian].
Byudzhetnij kodeks Ukraїni vіd 08.07.2010 № 2456-VI [The Budget Code of Ukraine from 8 July 2010№ 2456-VI]. (2010). Ofіcіjnij vіsnik Ukraїni, 59, article 2047 [In Ukrainian].
Pro zastosuvannya sudami zakonodavstva pro sudovі vitrati u civіl’nih spravah: Postanova Plenumu Vishchogo specіalіzovanogo sudu Ukraїni z rozglyadu civіl’nih і krimіnal’nih sprav vіd 17.10.2014 № 10 [About Application by Courts of the Legislation on Court Costs in Civil Cases: The resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Specialized Court of Ukraine on Consideration of Civil and Criminal Cases from 17 October 2014 № 10]. (2014). zakon4.rada.gov.ua Retrived from: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0010740-14 [In Ukrainian].
Pro vnesennya zmіn do deyakih zakonodavchih aktіv Ukraїni shchodo profesіjnoї і trudovoї reabіlіtacії іnvalіdіv: Zakon Ukraїni vіd 06.10.2005 № 2960- IV [On Aendments to Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment of Persons with Disabilities: Law of Ukraine from 6 October 2005 № 2960- IV]. (2005). Ofіcіjnij vіsnik, 50 (28.12.2005), article 3108 [In Ukrainian].
Zvarich, O.V. (2013). Іnstitucіjnі zasadi sudovogo zboru і derzhavnogo mita [The Institutional Framework of the Court fee and the State Duty]. Akademіya mitnoї sluzhbi Ukraїni. Vіsnik Akademії mitnoї sluzhbi Ukraїni. Serіya "Ekonomіka". Dnepropetrovsk: Akad. mitnoї sluzhbi Ukraїni, 2 (50), 5-10 [In Ukrainian].
Lazyuk, S.V. (2012). Sudovij zbіr yak rіznovid derzhavnogo mita [Court Fee as a Kind of State Duty]. Pravo і suspіl’stvo, 6, 63-65 [In Ukrainian].
Kujbіda, R.O. (2004). Reformuvannya pravosuddya v Ukraїnі: stan і perspektivi [Reforming of Justice in Ukraine: Status and Prospects]. Kyiv: Ataka [In Ukrainian].
Pro Koncepcіyu vdoskonalennya sudіvnictva dlya utverdzhennya spravedlivogo sudu v Ukraїnі vіdpovіdno do єvropejs’kih standartіv: Ukaz Prezidenta vіd 10.05.2006 № 361/2006 [On the Concept of Improving the Procedure for Approval of Fair Trial in Ukraine in Accordance with European Standards: Decree of President of Ukraine from 10 May 2006 № 361/2006]. (2006). Ofіcіjnij vіsnik Ukraїni, 19, article 1376 [In Ukrainian].
Sakara, N.Yu. (2010). Problema dostupnostі pravosuddya u civіl’nih spravah [The problem of Accessibility of Justice in Civil Cases]. Kharkov: Pravo [In Ukrainian].
Podatkovij kodeks Ukraїni vіd 02.12.2010 № 2755-V [Tax Code of Ukraine from 2 December 2010 № 2755-V]. (2010). Ofіcіjnij vіsnik Ukraїni, 92 (10.12.2010), (Part 1), article 3248 [In Ukrainian].
Aires v. Portugal (dec.), no. 21775/93, D.R. no. 81-B, p. 48 [.
Perdigao v. Portugal, no. 24768/06, § 41, 16 November 2010.
Kurs civіl’nogo procesu [The Course of Civil Process]. (2011). Kharkov: Pravo [In Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Наталія Юріївна Сакара
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
