The legal doctrine: definition, features and structure

Igor Viktorovych Semenihin

Abstract


    The conception of a «legal doctrine» is commonly used in domestic jurisprudence. At the same time, in legal science, particularly, in the theory of law, there are significant differences on awareness of the legal nature of a legal doctrine, determination of its concept and characteristics, the disclosure of its relationship and interaction with legal science, which predetermines the importance and timeliness of this research. Actuality of the working out of the legal doctrine is closely connected with the problem of determination of its place and role in the development of domestic law and legal system as a whole. It is important to determine the structure of a legal doctrine and establish the conditions under which scientific provisions acquire features peculiar to the doctrine and are used in various branches of state-legal practice. It is actual the determination of optimal approaches and forms of such its use as in lawmaking and enforcement of law so, in particular, in judicial practice. Works by S. Maksymov, R. Puzikov, F. Shecaira, M. Van Hoecke, A. Vasiliev, Y. Yevgrafova are noteworthy among modern scientists researching this problem.

    A legal doctrine is the product of scientific activity, some kind of results of cognition of state-legal reality in a particular historical period. A legal doctrine is created as a result of carrying out of fundamental scientific researches connected with deep and a comprehensive analysis of the essence of the state-legal phenomena and processes and revealing of their objective laws of their appearance and development.

    This is the main reason for its high authority, a prerequisite to legitimate doctrinal provisions in legal consciousness of jurists and, as a result, perception by legal practice. The main functions of a legal doctrine – the interpretation and systematization of law. It also has a prescriptive nature as law contains a vision how it should be that is, its imaginary ideal image, justifying the need and feasibility of consolidating the rule of law, the formation of new branches and institutions of law and their improvement or reformation. An important part of a legal doctrine is estimated and prognostic component that contains program provisions and is the result of a critical analysis of practices of state- and lawmaking. A legal doctrine being practically oriented as complex of scientific knowledge of law has a complex multilevel structure, elements of each level of this structure differ by level of abstraction and have different degrees of generalization.

   This is firstly, partial legal doctrine – level of branch doctrinal elaborations in which thoroughly investigated certain areas of law: study their nature, peculiarities of formation, development trends and improved conceptual and categorical apparatus. Secondly, based on the systematization of branch doctrinal elaborations and their reflection and generalization it is formed general legal doctrine, the provisions of which are formulated in the abstract, most general form. Its core element is the doctrine on the sources of law and interpretation of legal rules and also argumentation theory. In modern legal systems of the Anglo-American law and Romano-Germanic law, as well as, in the domestic legal system, the legal doctrine – an integral part though non-normative element of the mechanism of legal regulation. It serves primarily as the ideological and theoretical foundation and theoretical core of rulemaking and promotes its correct understanding and application of legal orders.

   On the basis of the determined features, the legal doctrine can be defined as, predetermined by the character of the legal culture of society, a complete and logically coordinated set of ideas recognized by the legal community and scientific views on law which is the basis of professional legal conscience and conceptual framework of rulemaking, enforcement of law and interpretation of law activity.


Keywords


legal doctrine; legal science; citation practice; source of law; legal system

References


Vasiliev, A.A. (2009). Pravovaja doktrina: voprosy teorii i istorii [The legal doctrine: theoretical and historical questions]. Moscow: Jurlitinform [in Russian].

Dubinchin, A. (2015). Doktrina anglijskogo chastnogo prava: knigi –"chempiony" po osnovnym razdelam prava [English doctrine of private law: books-champions in main areas of law]. Retrived from: http://media.wix.com/ugd/77d674_42ff22c99da04ef196a3cade 65fd88e3.pdf [in Russian].

Emelin, M.Ju. (2015). Pravovaja doktrina v sisteme istochnikov obshhego prava: na osnove analiza pravovoj sistemy Soedinennyh Shtatov Ameriki [The legal doctrine in the system of legal sources of common law: based on analysis of the United States legal system]. Penza [in Russian].

Maksymov, S.I. (2013). Pravova doktryna: filosofs'ko-pravovyj pidkhid [Legal doctrine: philisophical and legal approach]. Pravo Ukrainy, is. 9, 32–54 [in Ukrainian].

Poljakov, S.B. (2014). Juridicheskaja nauka, praktika, politika [Legal science, legal practice, state policy]. Lex russica, is. 4, 413–420 [in Russian].

Puzikov, R.V. (2003). Juridicheskaja doktrina v sfere pravovogo regulirovanija (problemy teorii i praktiki) [The legal doctrine in the sphere of legal regulations: theoretical and practical problems]. Tambov [in Russian].

Sadohina, N.E. (2005). Razvitie istochnikov rossijskogo prava v sovetskij i postsovetskij period [Evolution of legal sources of Russian law in Soviet and post-Soviet periods]. Tambov [in Russian].

Scherbaniuk, O. (2015). Pravovi doktryny iak fundament rozvytku iurydychnoi nauky [Legal doctrines as the foundation of legal science]. Pravo Ukrainy, is. 9, 201–203 [in Ukrainian].

Shecaira, F. (2011). Legal scholarship as a source of law. Hamilton: McMaster University.

Van Hoecke, M. F. Ost (1998) Legal doctrine in crisis: towards a European legal science. Legal Stidies, 12, 197–215.

According to the electronic register of judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada, from https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/en/d/s/index.do?cont=+Glanville+Williams.


GOST Style Citations


1. Васильев А. А. Правовая доктрина: вопросы теории и истории / А. А. Васильев. – Москва : Юрлитинформ, 2009. – 272 с.

2. Дубинчин А. Доктрина английского частного права: книги–"чемпионы" по основным разделам права [Электронный ресурс] / А. Дубинчин. – Режим доступа :  http://media.wix.com/ugd/77d674_42ff22c99da04ef196a3cade65fd88e3.pdf

3. Емелин М. Ю. Правовая доктрина в системе источников общего права: на основе анализа правовой системы Соединенных Штатов Америки : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.01 / Емелин Михаил Юрьевич; Пензенский гос. ун-т. – Пенза, 2015. – 201 с.

4. Максимов С. І. Правова доктрина: філософсько-правовий підхід / С. І. Максимов // Право України. – 2013. – № 9. – С. 43–54.

5. Поляков С. Б. Юридическая наука, практика, политика / С. Б. Поляков // Lex russica. – 2014. – № 4. – С. 413–420.

6. Пузиков Р. В. Юридическая доктрина в сфере правового регулирования (проблемы теории и практики) : дис. … канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.01 / Пузиков Руслан Владимирович ; Тамбов. гос. ун-т. – Тамбов, 2003. – 213 c.


7. Садохина Н. Е. Развитие источников российского права в советский и постсоветский период : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.01 / Садохина Наталия Евгеньевна;  Тамбов.гос. ун-т. – Тамбов, 2005. – 186 с.

8. Щербанюк О. Правові доктрини як фундамент розвитку юридичної науки / О. Щербанюк, О. Гріненко // Право України. – 2015. – № 9. – С. 201–203.

9. Shecaira F. Legal scholarship as a source of law : a thesis … for the degree of doctor of philosophy / F. Shecaira ; McMaster University. – Hamilton. – 2011. – 157 р.

10. Van Hoecke M. Legal doctrine in crisis: towards a European legal science / M. Van Hoecke, F. Ost // Legal Stidies. – 1998. – Vol. 12. – Р. 197–215.

11. За даними електронного реєстру рішень Верховного Суду Канади [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/en/d/s/index.do?cont=+Glanville+Williams





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.132.60660

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2224-9281