Reasonable time of a trial and the conception of judicial time management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.132.59347Keywords:
reasonable time of a trial, right to a fair trial, judicial time management, optimum timeframe, foreseeable timeframe.Abstract
The paper addresses a reasonable time of a trial as an element of art. 6 (1) of European Convention on Human Rights within the conception of judicial time management. The author analyses specific features of the judicial time management according to the studies of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ).
References
Bakiyevets v. Russia, no. 22892/03, § 48, 15 June 2006. Retrieved from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75840.
Terms of reference of the Steering group of the SATURN Centre for judicial time management, renewed by the CEPEJ at its 22d plenary meeting. Retrieved from: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/Delais/mandat_2014_2015_en.asp.
Delay in Judicial Proceedings: a Preliminary Inquiry into the Relation between the Demands of the Reasonable Time Requirements of Article 6.1 ECHR and their Consequences for Judges and Judicial Administration in the Civil, Criminal and Administrative Justice Chains / Preliminary Draft Report by M. Fabry and Ph. Langbroek. Retrieved from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ INTLAWJUSTINST/Resources/FabriLangbroek.pdf.
Report on «Length of Court Proceedings in the Member States of the Council of Europe based on the Сase-law of the ECHR», CEPEJ(2006)15. Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CEPEJ(2006)15&Language=lanEnglish&Site=COE&BackC olorInternet=B9BDEE&BackColorIntranet=FFCD4F&BackColorLogged=FFC679.
Framework Program «A New Objective for Judicial Systems: the Рrocessing of Each Case within an Optimum аnd Foreseeable Timeframe, CEPEJ(2004)19Rev. Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CEPEJ(2004)19&Language=lanEnglish&Ver=rev2&Site=COE&BackColorInternet=B9BDEE&BackColorIntranet=FFCD4F&BackColorLogged=FFC67.
The Checklist for Time Management, CEPEJ(2005)12. Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CEPEJ(2005)12&Language=lanBosnian&Ver=rev&Site=COE&BackColorInternet=B9BDEE&BackColorIntranet=FFCD4F&BackColorLogged=FFC67.
Compendium of Best Practices on Time Management of Judicial Proceedings, CEPEJ(2006)13. Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp? Ref=CEPEJ(2006)13& Language=lanEnglish&Site=COE&BackColorInternet=B9BDEE&BackColorIntranet=FFCD4F&BackColorLogged=FFC679.
Questionnaire on Common Case Categories, Judicial Timeframes аnd Delays, CEPEJ-SATURN(2007)3E. Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CEPEJ-SATURN (2007)3&Language=lanEnglish&Site=&BackColorInternet=DBDCF2&BackColorIntranet=FDC864&BackColor Logged=FDC864.
Revised SATURN Guidelines for Judicial Time Management, CEPEJ(2014)16. – Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CEPEJ(2008)8Rev&Language=lan English&Ver=original&BackColorInternet=eff2fa&BackColorIntranet=eff2fa&BackColorLogged=c1cbe6.
A Guide for Implementing the SATURN Time Management Tools in Courts, CEPEJ(2015)18. Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CEPEJ(2015)18 &Language=lanEnglish&Ver=original&BackColorInternet=DBDCF2&BackColorIntranet=FDC864&BackColorLogged=FDC864.
The Report on «Time Management іn Judicial Systems: A Northern Europe study», CEPEJ(2006)14. Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc. jsp?Ref=CEPEJ(2006)14& Language=lanEnglish&Site=COE&BackColorInternet=B9BDEE&BackColorIntranet=FFCD4F&BackColorLogged=FFC679.
Reports on the Implementation of the CEPEJ Guidelines for Judicial Time Management in 7 Pilot Courts/Institutions, CEPEJ-SATURN(2011)1. Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id= 1854989& Site=COE.
Implementation of SATURN Time Management Tools – Synthesizing Report from Seven Test Projects, CEPEJ-SATURN(2011)2. Retrieved from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CEPEJSATURN(2011)2&Language=lanEnglish&Site=&BackColorInternet=DBDCF2&BackCol orIntranet=FDC864&BackColorLogged=FDC864.
SATURN Guidelines for Judicial Time Management Comments and Implementation Examples, CEPEJ-SATURN(2015)2. Retrieved from: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/ cepej/Delais/2_2015_Saturn_Guidelines_commentsimplementation.pdf.
European Judicial Systems. Edition 2014 (2012 data). European Commission for the Efficiency Justice (CEPEJ). – Council of Europe, Belgium, 2014. – 545 p.
Prozorist' i efektyvnist' sudovoyi systemy Ukrayiny : materialy dlya pidhotovky mediatoriv iz kola suddiv Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrayiny, Vyshchykh spetsializovanykh sudiv ta predstavnykiv vyshchykh navchal'nykh zakladiv u ramkakh realizatsiyi spil'noyi prohramy Yevropeys'koho Soyuzu ta Rady Yevropy [Transparency and efficiency of the judicial system of Ukraine: materials for training mediators from the circle of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, the High specialized courts and representatives of higher education institutions in the framework of a joint program of the European Union and Council of Europe] (20-25 bereznya 2011.). (2011). Кyiv [in Ukrainian].
Fabri M. (2009). The Italian Maze Towards Trials within Reasonable Time, in The Right to Trial within a Reasonable Time and Short-term Reform of the European Court of Human Rights: Round Table Organized by the Slovenian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, Bled, Slovenia (21-22 September 2009). Ljubljana: Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Ministry of Justice, 12-23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Тетяна Андріївна Цувіна
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
