Grounds for the application of judicial discretion in criminal proceedings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.126.52440Keywords:
judicial discretion, discretionary (ad hoc or discretionary) the law, with respect to whether or alternative sanctions mandatory rules of law, the concept of evaluationAbstract
This paper analyzes the essence of two of the three grounds specified by the author for the use of judicial discretion (discretion) in court proceedings. In particular, investigate the nature of discretionary (ad hoc or discretionary) with respect to the law and determined whether alternative sanctions mandatory rules of law (law of nature, especially the consolidation of the law, the types and cost). Expressed and reasoned opinion on the unreasonableness of reference to the reasons for judicial discretion legal gaps and conflicts in legislation, regulations and scientific advisory and methodical.
References
Berezin, A. A. (2007). Predely pravoprimenitel'nogo usmotrenija. N. Novgorod, 25. Available at: http://www.dissercat.com/content/predely-pravoprimenitelnogo-usmotreniya#ixzz2oxdrMrAV
Ermakova, K. P. (2010). Predely sudebnogo usmotrenija. Moscow, 212.
Slovar' inostrannyh slov. In 2 volumes. Vol. 1 (2002). Moscow, 864.
Lupinskaja, P. A. (1976). Reshenija v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Ih vidy, soderzhanie i formy. Moscow: Juridicheskaja literatura, 168.
Bonner, A. T. (1980). Primenenie normativnyh aktov v grazhdanskom processe. Moscow: Juridicheskaja literatura, 160.
Slovnyk inshomovnyh sliv. Available at: http://insm.com.ua/cgi/u/book
Goncharov, V. B., Kozhevnikov, V. V. (2001). Problema usmotrenija pravoprimenjajushhego sub'ekta v pravoohranitel'noj sfere. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 3, 55–58.
Cvik, M. V., Petryshyn, O. V., Avramenko, L. V. et. al.; Cviko, M. V., Petryshyn, O. V. (Eds.) (2009). Zagal'na teorija derzhavy i prava: pidruchnyk. Kharkiv: Pravo, 584.
Lapshin, I. S. (2002). Dispozitivnye normy prava: monografija. N. Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaja akademija MVD Rossii, 132.
Berezin, A. A. (2007). Predely pravoprimenitel'nogo usmotrenija. N. Novgorod, 200.
Matuzov, N. I. (2000). Kollizii v prave: prichiny, vidy i sposoby razreshenija. Pravovedenie, 5, 225–244.
Korchagin, A. Ju. (2006). Sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo kak ob#ekt kriminalistiki. Ros. justicija, 5, 24–26.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 В. В. Вапнярчук
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
