Theoretical and Methodological Framework for the Relationship Between State Sovereignty and International Legal Responsibility

Authors

  • Vladyslav Melnychenko Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.171.343551

Keywords:

sovereignty, international legal responsibility, doctrine of international law, legal reality

Abstract

This scientific publication explores the theoretical and methodological foundations underlying the relationship between the interconnected concepts of state sovereignty and international responsibility. The relevance of this research stems from the need for effective regulation of states international legal responsibility. The article aims to identify the doctrinal basis for the relationship between holding states accountable under international law for violations of the established legal order and the protective function of sovereignty, which can sometimes shield violators of international norms from legal consequences. To achieve this, the article employs a range of general scientific and specialized methods, including comparison, reductionism, dialectical analysis and synthesis, the comparative legal method, as well as formal and logical legal methods. The article explores the role of state responsibility within the framework of international law. It highlights that, at present, international legal scholarship maintains notably conservative approaches to regulating relations between states. As a result, the application of international legal responsibility for states encounters several challenges, especially regarding the unique interpretations of state sovereignty. Applying the principle of reductionism, sovereignty is viewed as the embodiment of the key qualities of legal personality. Thus, a sovereign entity’s (state’s) capacity to assume responsibility for breaches of international law is considered an expression of its sovereignty, which includes both rights and obligations. The doctrine of state sovereignty is shown to be dynamic, leading to its continual transformation within legal reality. This dynamism challenges the concept of "limited" sovereignty, as its proponents often disregard earlier iterations and deny the doctrine's evolution. Recognizing this opens new avenues for research, particularly in relation to how states are held accountable under international law.

References

Vazhna, K.A. (2019). The meaning of the concept of state criminal responsibility. International Relations: Theory and Practical Aspects, 4, 129-140. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-745x.4.2019.177644.

Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the work of its fifty-third session. Retrieved from https://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_2001_v2_p2.pdf.

Besson, S. (2022). Theories of International Responsibility Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sivash, O.M. (2015). Сonception "Responsibility to Protect" as Balance of Principles of State Sovereignty and Respect for Human Rights. Law Forum, 4, 253-259. Retrieved from http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=FP_index.htm_2015_4_46[5] Fournier, P. (2014). L’intervention pour cause d’humanité chez Louis Le Fur. Revue française de droit constitutionnel. French Review of Constitutional Law, 100, 125-140.

Voitsekhovska, O.R. (2018). International Legal Order: Concept and Essential Features. Scientific Bulletin of Public and Private Law, 4(2), 181-186. Retrieved from http://www.nvppp.in.ua/vip/2018/4/tom_2/37.pdf.

Isokaitė-Valužė, I., & Grigaitė-Daugirdė, G. (2024). Invocation of International (Treaty) Law Principles Against an Aggressor State: Suspension, Restriction of Membership Rights, Expulsion? Kyiv-Mohyla Law & Politics Journal, 10, 19-50. https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj320035.2024-10.19-50.

Brownlie, I. (1998). The Rule of Law in International Affairs: International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations. The Hague: Kluwer Law.

Bonafe, B.I. (2009). The Relationship Between State and Individual Responsibility for International Crimes. Lieden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. Retrieved from https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf.

Herbert, F. (2024). Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens) And Russia’s Aggression Against Ukraine. Kyiv-Mohyla Law & Politics Journal, 10, 51-81. https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj320043.2024-10.51-81.

Crawford, J. (2013). State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Case concerning the difference between New Zealand and France concerning the interpretation or application of two agreements concluded on 9 July 1986 between the two States and which related to the problems arising from the Rainbow Warrior Affair. Retrieved from https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_xx/215-284.pdf.

Baidin, Yu.V. (2012). State Sovereignty and Its Limits in the Context of European Integration (Theoretical Issues). Ph.D. Thesis. Kharkiv.

Cryer, R. (2005). International Criminal Law vs State Sovereignty: Another Round? The European Journal of International Law. 2005. Vol. 16(5), 979-1000. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi156.

Melnychenko, V.S. (2024) The absoluteness of state sovereignty in the ideas of thinkers of the Sixteenth – Nineteenth Centuries. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, 4(84), 311-317. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.84.4.44.

Dohovir pro zaboronu viiny yak zasobu natsionalnoi polityky (Pakt Briana-Kelloha). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_647#Text.

The Charter and Judgment of the Nürnberg Tribunal – History and Analysis: Memorandum submitted by the Secretary-General. Retrieved from https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_5.pdf.

Latenko, V.S. (2018). Shliakhy dekolonizatsii frantsuzkykh volodin v Azii ta Afrytsi pislia Druhoi svitovoi viiny (1944-1962 rr.). Humanitarian Bulletin, 13, 130-139. Retrieved from https://er.chdtu.edu.ua/bitstream/ChSTU/1982/1/17.pdf.

The Treaty of Peace Between the Allied and Associated Powers and Germany. LONDON; Printed and published by his majesty’s stationery office. Retrieved from https://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/resources/transcripts/cth10_doc_1919.pdf.

Mizhnarodna konventsiia pro likvidatsiiu vsikh form rasovoi dyskryminatsii vid 21 hrudnia 1965 r. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_105#Text.

Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and People. Retrieved from https://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/dicc/dicc_e.pdf.

Report of the International Law Commissionon the work of its twenty-ninth session. Retrieved from https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/reports/a_32_10.pdf.

Hapotii, V.D. (2005). Theoretical and practical aspects of the sovereignty of the people, nation and state. Ph.D. Thesis. Kharkiv.

Tarasov, O.V. (2014). The subject of international law: a problem of modern theory. Kharkiv: Pravo.

Tarasov, O.V. (2023). Legal Personality in International Migration: the Personological Aspect. Problems of Legality, 162, 218-238. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.162.287143.

Breau, S. (2016). The Responsibility to Protect in International Law: An Emerging Paradigm Shift. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Melnychenko, V. (2025). Theoretical and Methodological Framework for the Relationship Between State Sovereignty and International Legal Responsibility. Problems of Legality, (171). https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.171.343551

Issue

Section

Articles