Trends in the Development of Digital Forensics: Challenges and Prospects for Criminal Justice Agencies

Authors

  • Yevheniia Demydova Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.168.324997

Keywords:

digital forensics, digital traces, electronic traces, digital evidence, evidence evaluation, computer data

Abstract

The relevance of this study is driven by the rapid digitalization of society and the necessity for forensic science to adapt to contemporary realities. Traditional methods of collecting, examining, and utilizing evidence are becoming insufficient for addressing the challenges of modern criminal proceedings, as an increasing number of offenses leave digital traces. This article aims to analyze trends in the development of digital forensics, identify key challenges in detecting, recording, seizing, and examining digital evidence, explore the use of modern digital devices and information technologies for investigative purposes, and propose prospective directions for enhancing the work of criminal justice agencies. To achieve this goal, normative-legal analysis, comparative-legal approaches, and case study analyses were employed. The research was based on a review of contemporary scientific publications, legislative acts, and judicial practices, allowing for the identification of both positive aspects of applying modern technologies in criminal proceedings and issues related to their implementation.​

The findings indicate that the use of advanced technologies significantly expands the capabilities of criminal justice agencies but simultaneously presents challenges and problems. Specifically, it was established. There is a lack of a unified terminology framework, both at the scientific and normative levels, in this context, necessitating improvements in current legislation.​ Challenges exist in detecting, recording, and seizing digital traces.​There is an insufficiency of comprehensive scientific and practical developments regarding the use of digital forensic tools.​ There is a need to update and develop new methodologies for conducting forensic examinations, considering scientific and technological advancements.​ The qualifications of criminal justice personnel in handling digital evidence are inadequate, highlighting the importance of continuous professional development for investigators, prosecutors, detectives, and judges in collecting, utilizing, examining, and assessing digital information. Additionally, incorporating these topics into the curricula of higher legal educational institutions is essential to develop competencies in digital forensics.​ There is an absence of unified international standards regarding the use of digital forensic tools and legal mechanisms for cooperation among law enforcement agencies, underscoring the importance of enhancing international collaboration and experience exchange at both practical and scientific levels.​ The article proposes directions for addressing these issues. Future research should focus on developing unified methodological standards and normative-legal mechanisms to ensure the effective integration of digital forensics into the criminal justice system.

References

Shepitko, V. (2021). Theoretical and methodological model of criminalistics and its new directions. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 3(25), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.3.2021.02

Latysh, K. V. (2022). Digital forensics during the war in Ukraine: Opportunities for the use of specialized knowledge in the field of information technology. Kriminalistika ir teismo ekspertologija: mokslas, studijos, praktika, 18, 31–37.

Bratishko, N. (2024). Directions of using digital forensics under martial law. Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipro State University of Internal Affairs, 2, 282–288. https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2023-6-282-288

Shevchuk, V. (2023). Development trends in criminalistics in the era of digitalization. Scientific Collection «InterConf+», 33(155), 198–218. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.05.2023.019

Shepitko, V., & Shepitko, M. (2021). The doctrine of forensic science and forensic expertise: Formation, current state, and development in Ukraine. Law of Ukraine, 8, 12–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.33498/louu-2021-08-012

Miller, C. M. (2023). A survey of prosecutors and investigators using digital evidence: A starting point. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100296

Allah Rakha, N. (2024). Cybercrime and the law: Addressing the challenges of digital forensics in criminal investigations. Mexican Law Review, 16(2), 23–54. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2024.2.18892

Demidova, Y. Y. (2024). Digital traces of a criminal offense: Concept and features. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Series, 85(4), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.85.4.10

Lushchyk, I. V., & Tyapkin, A. S. (2023). Problematic issues in defining digital forensics. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 23, 135–160. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2023.23.281734

Avdeeva, G. K. (2024). Problems of determining the reliability of digital evidence in criminal proceedings. Bulletin of the Luhansk Educational and Scientific Institute named after E. O. Didorenko, 1, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.33766/2786-9156.105.33-48

Avdeeva, G., & Zhivutska-Kozlovska, E. (2023). Problems of using digital evidence in criminal proceedings in Ukraine and the USA. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 1, 126–143.

Harasymiv, O., Marko, S., & Ryashko, O. (2023). Digital evidence: Some problematic issues regarding their concept and use in criminal proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Series, 2(75), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.75.2.25

Angelenyuk, A.-M. Y. (2023). The use of electronic evidence in the criminal procedural law of Ukraine (problematic issues). Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Series, 2(79), 214–218. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.79.2.32

Matviichuk, A. V. (2024). Electronic evidence in corruption offenses. DICTUM FACTUM, 2(16), 239–245. Retrieved from https://df.duit.in.ua/index.php/dictum/article/view/360

Kalinnikov, O. V. (2024). Electronic (digital) evidence in criminal proceedings: Concept and features. The 26th International Scientific and Practical Conference “World Problems and Ways of Solving Modern Problems” (July 02–05, 2024, Oslo, Norway). International Science Group.

Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. (2004). Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 40-41, 42, art. 492.

Convention on Cybercrime. (2001). Council of Europe Convention. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_575 (accessed: 9.03.2025).

Demidova, Y., Latysh, K., & Kapustina, M. (2023). Digital evidence in criminal justice: Challenges of utilization. In Organizational and Legal Fundamentals for the Formation of a Security Environment in Ukraine: Scientific Monograph (pp. 305–318). Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-363-7-14

Criminalistics: Textbook in 2 volumes. Vol. 1. (Shepitko, V. Yu., Ed.). (2019). Kharkiv: Pravo.

The use of electronic (digital) evidence in criminal proceedings: Methodological recommendations. (Gutsalyuk, M. V., Havlovskyi, V. D., Khakhanovskyi, V. G., et al.; Edited by O. V. Korneiko). (2020). Kyiv: Publishing House of the National Academy of Internal Affairs.

Shevchuk, V. M. (2024). The role of modern digital technologies in documenting and investigating war crimes in Ukraine. Modern Directions of Forensic Science and Criminalistics: Materials of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the 110th Anniversary of the Odesa Research Institute of Forensic Examinations of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine (September 5, 2024, Odesa). Odesa: Yuridika, 510–513.

Shevchuk, V. M. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence technologies and the process of digitalization of criminalistics in wartime. Current Problems of Combating Crime and Corruption: Collection of Abstracts of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference. Kharkiv: Yurayt, 171–176.

Yaremchuk, V. O. (2024). Modern forensic scientific and technical tools. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 4, 659–660. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2024-4/157

Baranchuk, V. V. (2020). 3D scanning as a way of recording crime scenes: Advantages and disadvantages. Legal Bulletin, 16, 280–286. https://doi.org/10.32850/LB2414-4207.2020.16.01

Torbas, O. O. (2024). OSINT in criminal investigations: A textbook. Odesa: Yurydyka.

Supreme Court Judge analyzed the criteria for the admissibility and reliability of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. (n.d.). Official website of the Supreme Court. Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/news/1751385/

Likhtanska, A. P., & Mykhailov, V. O. (2024). The use of OSINT in the criminal law of Ukraine. DICTUM FACTUM, 1(15), 105–111.

Published

2025-04-11

How to Cite

Demydova, Y. (2025). Trends in the Development of Digital Forensics: Challenges and Prospects for Criminal Justice Agencies. Problems of Legality, (168), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.168.324997

Issue

Section

Articles