Towards a Legal Framework that Protects Freedom of Expression in Electoral Processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.166.315459Keywords:
defamation, elections, election campaigning, electoral processes, freedom of expression, freedom of speechAbstract
In democratic countries attention is devoted to the issue of freedom of speech and freedom of expression and the role of public authorities during elections. Freedom of speech and freedom of expression are guaranteed at both the international and national levels today. The international community has created a significant number of international agreements and acts of “soft law” on standards of freedom of expression. In particular, the Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters establishes as the first General condition for democratic elections the respect for fundamental human rights, and particularly freedom of expression, assembly and association, without which there can be no true democracy. On the one hand, the problem of ensuring freedom of expression during elections is caused by the wider limits of permissible criticism of candidates and the importance of coverage of the election process, on the other hand, it caused by restrictions on the conduct of election campaigning and the necessity to provide equal access to the media for the subjects of the electoral process. In this context, it is important to find a balance between the right to free elections, freedom of speech and other rights, freedoms and interests of the subjects of the electoral process. This article researches the modern problems of national legal guarantee of freedom of speech and freedom of expression and international electoral standards on the protection of freedom of speech and freedom of expression in the electoral process.
References
Ad Library. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?active_status=all&ad_type=political_and_issue_ads&country=UA.
Ad Policies. (2019). [10.a Ads Related to Politics or Issues of National Importance]. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/policies/ads/restricted_content/political.
Ad Policies (2019), [10.b Disclaimers for Ads Related to Politics or Issues of National Importance]. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/policies/ads/restricted_content/disclaimers.
Advertising Policies (2019), [Political content]. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/adspolicy/answer/6014595?hl=en.
Barabash, Yu.H. (Барабаш Ю.Г., 2012), Окремі питання розгляду судами виборчих спорів [Some issues of consideration of electoral disputes by courts], Viche, vol. 14, pp. 5-9. [In Ukrainian].
Case of Animal Defenders International v. United Kingdom (2013), ECtHR, 22 April 2013, № 48876/08.
Case of Bowman v. the United Kingdom (1998), ECtHR, 19 February 1998, № 24839/94
Case of Editorial Board of Pravoye Delo and Shtekel v. Ukraine (2011), ECtHR, 5 May 2011, № 33014/05.
Case of Feldek v. Slovakia (2001), ECtHR, 12 July 2001, № 29032/95.
Case of Grinberg v. Russia (2005), ECtHR, 21 July 2005, № 23472/03.
Case of Handyside v. the United Kingdom (1976), ECtHR, 7 December 1976, № 5493/72.
Case of Karakó v. Hungary (2009), ECtHR, 28 April 2009, № 39311/05.
Case of Kwiecień v. Poland (2007), ECtHR, 9 January 2007, № 51744/99.
Case of Lingens v. Austria (1986), ECtHR, 8 July 1986, № 9815/82.
Case of Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium (1987), ECtHR, 2 March 1987, № 9267/81.
Case of Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom (1991), ECtHR, 24 October 1991, № 13585/88.
Case of Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey (2008), ECtHR, 8 July 2008, № 10226/03.
Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters (2002), adopted by the Venice Commission at its 51st Plenary Session (Venice, 5-6 July 2002).
Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (2002), Рішення Конституційного Суду України (справа про виборчу заставу), № 1-18/2002, 30.01.2002.
Decision of the Constitutional court of the Republic of Latvia (2002), Reshenye ot ymeny Latvyiskoi Respublyky, Case № 2002-08-01, 23.09.2002.
ERR News (2018), Za reklamoj jestonskih politikov i partij v facebook budut sledit, 29.11.2018. Retrieved from https://rus.err.ee/880986/za-reklamoj-jestonskih-politikov-i-partij-v-facebook-budut-sledit
Glavaš, D. (2017), Comparative Study “Political Advertising and Media Campaign During the Pre-election Period”, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, 28 September 2017, from https://www.osce.org/mission-to-montenegro/346631?download=true.
La Rue, F. (2014), Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Human Rights Council, 30 May 2014, A/HRC/26/30.
Kliuchkovskyi, Yu.B. (Ключковський Ю.Б, 2018), Принципи виборчого права: доктринальне розуміння, стан та перспективи законодавчої реалізації в Україні: монографія [Principles of electoral law: doctrinal understanding, status and prospects of legislative implementation in Ukraine: monograph], Kyiv: Vaite [In Ukrainian].
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe resolution (2007), State of human rights and democracy in Europe, № 1547, 15th Sitting, 18 April 2007.
Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (1999), On measures concerning media coverage of election campaigns, № R(99)15, 09.09.1999
Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (2016,) On the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing, Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj.
Resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (1998), Right to privacy, № 1165, 26 June 1998.
Resolution of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights (1995), Ways and means of overcoming obstacles to the establishment of a democratic society and requirements for the maintenance of democracy, № 1995/60, 59th meeting, 7 March 1995.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Богдан Мохончук, Павло Романюк
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.