EU Values as a Guide for Ukrainian Legal System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.166.315206Keywords:
European Union, EU values, rule of law, Court of Justice of the EU, judicial independence, European integrationAbstract
The relevance of the research topic is connected with Ukraine's candidate status for joining the European Union which raised the question of Ukraine's fulfillment of its obligations to implement part of the EU acquis into the national legal system. The European Union pays special attention not only to the fulfillment of obligations for the implementation of specifically defined EU legal acts, but also to the respect and dissemination of its values by the candidate states. After all, the biggest challenge that the EU has faced at the current stage of its functioning is the violation of EU values by Member States and weak mechanisms for countering such violations. This, of course, requires a rethinking of approaches to the protection of values enshrined in Art. 2 of the EU Treaty: respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights. The practice of the Court of Justice of the EU, which was a response to the violation of the rule of law by Poland and Hungary, has a great impact on the trends in the protection of EU values. Therefore, the purpose of the research is to study the evolution of the status of EU values, their interpretation by the Court of Justice of the EU, as well as the analysis of their protection mechanisms. In the research the study of the practice of the Court of Justice of the EU in the field of the rule of law is analyzed because it is important for Ukraine, as it contains the interpretation of this value, which is common to Ukraine and the EU and the observance of which plays a key role in Ukraine's successful entry into the Union.References
Winter, J.A. (1972). Direct Applicability and Direct Effect – Two Distinct and Different Concept in Сommunity Law. Common Market Law Review, 9, 425-438.
Dashwood, A. (1978). The Principle of Direct Effect in European Community Law. Journal of Common Market Studies, 16, 229-245.
Pescatore, P. (1983). The Doctrine of Direct Effect: An Infant Disease of Community Law. European Law Review, 8, 155-177.
De Burca, G. (1992). Giving Effect to European Community Directives. Modern Law Review. Vol. 55. P. 215–240.
Tridimas, T. (1994). Horizontal Effect of Directives: A Missed Opportunity? Environmental Law Review, 19, 621-636.
Bratsuk, I. (2010). The influence of the EU Court on the formation and development of the principle of direct effect of the law of the European Union. Legal Ukraine, 2, 129-132.
Von Bogdandy A., & Schill, S. (2011). Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity under the Lisbon Treaty. Common Market Law Review, 48(5), 1417-1454.
Kochenov, D. (2005). EU Enlargement Law: History and Recent Developments: Treaty – Custom Concubinage? European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 9(6), 1-23. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=704381.
Kochenov, D. (2004). Behind the Copenhagen Façade: The Meaning and Structure of the Copenhagen Political Criterion of Democracy and the Rule of Law. European Integration Online Papers, 8(10), 1-24. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=563743.
Puissochet, J-P. (1975). The Enlargement of the European Communities. A Commentary on the Treaty and the Acts Concerning the Accession of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom. Leiden : Sijthoff.
Hillion, C. (2016). Overseeing the Rule of Law in the EU: Legal mandate and means’. European Policy Analysis, 1, 1-16.
Closa, C., & Kochenov, D. (Eds.). Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Judgement of the Court of Justice C-156/21 Hungary V Parliament аnd Council ECLI:EU:C:2022:97 аnd C-157/21 Poland V Parliament and Council ECLI:EU:C:2022:98. In Case law of the Court of Justice of the EU on issues of the rule of law and its significance for Ukraine. EU project "Law-Justice", 47-50.
Lazowski, A. (2022)/ Strengthening the rule of law and the EU pre-accession policy: Repubblika v. Il-Prim Ministru. Common Market Law Review, 59(6), 1803-1822
Berchenko, H.V. (2020). Preamble to the Constitution: legal nature and practice of amendments. Carpathian Legal Gazette, 5(34), 44.
Tatsii, V.Ya., Petryshyn, O.V., & Barabash, Yu.G. et al. (Eds.). (2011). The Constitution of Ukraine: a scientific and practical commentary. 2nd ed., revision. and added. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Bratsuk, I., Burak, S., & Golovko-Gavrysheva, O. (2023). Actual problems of the implementation of the association agreement between Ukraine and the EU. M. Mykievich (Ed.). Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.
Komarova, T.V. (2023). The direct effect of association agreements is the final word according to the Court of Justice of the European Union. In I. Bratsuk, S. Burak, & O. Holovko-Havrysheva. Actual problems of the implementation of the association agreement between Ukraine and the EU. M. Mykievich (Ed.). (pp. 48-57). Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.
Van Elsuwege, P., & Chamon, M. (2019). The meaning of "association" under EU law. A study on the law and practice of EU association agreements. Brussels: European Parliament. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/608861/IPOL_STU(2019)608861_EN.pdf.
Van der Loo, G. (2016). The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area: A New Legal Instrument for EU integration without Membership. Leiden-Boston: Brill Nijhoff.
Petrov, R., Van der Loo, G., & Van Elsuwege, P. (2015) The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement: a New Legal Instrument of Integration Without Membership? Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, 1, 1-19.
Association Agreement between Ukraine, on the one hand, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their member states, on the other hand. (June 27, 2014). Retrieved from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011.
Komarova, T.V. (May 12, 2023). The principle of judicial independence as a component of the rule of law and a key element of the Association Agreement. In Human rights and democracy: Collection of science articles according to the materials of the IV science-practice conf. in European law. (pp. 3-7). Kharkiv.
Komarova, T.V. (2018). Court of the European Union: development of the judicial system and practice of interpretation of EU law. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Judgement of the Court of Justice Les Verts v Parliament, 294/83, ECLI:EU:C:1986:166. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61983CJ0294.
Lazowski, A., & Komarova, T. Case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the rule of law and its significance for Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.pravojustice.eu/storage/app/uploads/public/669/8c7/833/6698c7833db83422117737.pdf.
Judgement of the Court of Justice Commission v Poland, C 192/18, EU:C:2019:924. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0192.
Judgement of the Court of Justice C-64/16 Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas ECLI:EU:C:2018:117. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=ecli%3AECLI%3AEU%3AC%3A2018%3A117.
Judgement of the Court of Justice Commission v Poland, C-619/18, EU:C:2019:531. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62018CJ0619.
Matczak, M. (2020) The Clash of Powers in Poland’s Rule of Law Crisis: Tools of Attack and Self-Defense. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 12, 421-450. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-020-00144-0.
Grzeszczak, R., & Karolewski, Ireneusz P. The Rule of Law Crisis in Poland: A New Chapter. VerfBlog, 2018/8/08. https://doi.org/10.17176/20180809-090230-0.
Judgement of the Court of Justice A. K. and Others, C 585/18, C 624/18 & C 625/18, EU:C:2019:982. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62018CJ0585.
Judgement of the Court of Justice A.B., C.D., E.F., G.H., I.J. V krajowa rada sądownictwa, C-824/18, ECLI:EU:C:2021:153. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=ecli:ECLI%3AEU%3AC%3A2021%3A153.
Judgement of the Court of Justice PPU LM, C-216/18, ECLI:EU:C:2018:586. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62018CJ0216.
Judgement of the Court of Justice L and P, C‑354/20 PPU, C‑412/20 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2020:1033. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A62020CJ0354.
Blagoev, B. (2011). Expulsion of a Member State from the EU after Lisbon: political threat or legal reality? Tilburg Law Rev, 16, 191-237.
Kochenov, D. (2021). Article 7: A Commentary on a Much Talked-About "Dead" Provision. Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. von Bogdandy A., Bogdanowicz P., Canor I., Grabenwarter C., Taborowski M., Schmidt M. (Еds.). Vol. 298. Springer, Berlin: Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62317-6_6.
Pech, L. (2020). Article 7 TEU: From "Nuclear Option" to "Sisyphean Procedure"? Constitutionalism under Stress. Belavusau U., Gliszczynska-Grabias A. (Еds.). Oxford Academic, 2020. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198864738.003.0011.
Regulation (EU, Euratom). (December 22, 2020). 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget. Official Journal, L 433I, 1-10.
Judgement of the Court of Justice Reppublika, C 896/19, EU:C:2021:311. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62019CJ0896.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Тетяна Комарова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
