The Impact of the Case Law of the EU Court of Justice on Law Enforcement in National Law in the Context of Ukraine's Integration into the European Union

Authors

  • Maksym Tsvelikh Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.167.314354

Keywords:

European Union, EU Court of Justice, Ukraine, eurointegration, justice, EU justice system

Abstract

The article analyzes the legal status of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the legal system of the European Union in accordance with the EU founding treaties (Treaty on European Union, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), its interaction with the key institutions of the European Union, Member States and, in particular, their national judiciaries, as well as its role in ensuring respect for and a uniform approach to the application of European Union law in the territory of the 27 EU Member States. In the context of Ukraine's integration into the European Union, the author examines aspects of the importance of the EU Court of Justice and its case law in law enforcement, in particular, the emergence of a mechanism for interpreting EU law for national courts. The case-law of the EU Court of Justice, in particular, in the cases C-715/17, C-718/17, C-719/17 (European Commission v. Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic), C-658/11 European Parliament v. Council of the European Union, studied in the article, demonstrates the importance of the EU Court of Justice in preventing disputes and ensuring the uniformity of EU law. The EU experience shows that the case law of the CJEU helps to overcome differences in legal interpretation, promotes the rule of law, and forms the basis for effective legal harmonization. Ukraine, as a country on a way to join the European Union, faces the need to implement the judgments of the EU Court of Justice and take them into account in law enforcement for effective adaptation of national legislation to European standards. The article examines the main aspects of the impact of the case law of the EU Court of Justice on the legal system of Ukraine after its accession to the European Union and focuses on the challenges that may arise in the process of harmonization of Ukrainian legislation with the EU acquis.

References

Komarova, T.V. (2018). Organization of the EU judicial system. National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 25(1), 79-96.

Ukraine 2023 Report. (November 8, 2023). European Commision Staff working document. Brussels, SWD(2023) 699 final, 3-142.

Berezhna, K.V. (2014). Features and consequences of the judicial reform of the European Union. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 6, 256-259.

Komarova, T.V. (2010). Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Kharkiv: Pravo.

Consolidated version of the Treaty on the functioning of European Union. (2012). Official Journal of the European Union, 1-199.

Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union. (2016). Official Journal of the European Union, 1-43.

Kravchuk, V.M., & Yukhimyuk, O.M. (2022). General aspects of the legal status of a judge of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Expert: paradigms of legal sciences and public administration, 4(22), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2022-4(22)-99-107.

Matera, Claudio, Wessel, Ramses A. (2014). CJEU. Judgment of 24.06.2014 (Grand Chamber). Case C-658/11 European Parliament v Council. «External relations of the EU. Annulment of the decision on the conclusion of the EU. Mauritius Agreement. Choice of the proper legal basis». Context or Content? A CFSP or AFSJ Legal Basis for EU International Agreements. In: Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, 49, 1047-1064.

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber). European Parliament v Council of the European Union – Decision 2011/640/CFSP. (24 June, 2014). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A62011CJ0658 Case C-658/11.

Judgement of the Court (Third Chamber). European Commision v Republic of Poland, Commision v Hungary, Commision v Czech Republic Joined Cases C-715/17, C-718/17, C 719/17. Infocuria Case-law CJEU. (April 2, 2020). Retrieved from https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=228156&mode=req&pageIndex=1&dir=&occ=first&part=1&text=&doclang=EN&cid=4685201.

Press Release No. 89/23. Judgment of the Court in Case C-204/21. Commision v Poland (Independence and private life of judges). Retrieved from https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023-06/cp230089en.pdf.

Musienko, A.O., Averyanova, M.V., & Zhuk, O.I. (2023). Application of EU law in national courts of the Member States: an overview of the Court of Justice's practice and the experience of other countries. Journal: Topical Issues in Modern Science, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2023-6(12)-363-377

Dimitrakopoulos I. Conflicts between EU law and National Constitional Law in the Field of Fundamental Rights, 1-10. Retrieved from https://portal.ejtn.eu/PageFiles/17318/DIMITRAKOPOULOS%20Conflicts%20between%20EU%20law%20and%20National%20Constitutional%20Law.pdf.

Decision of Federal Constitutional Court. Case 2 BvR 2735/14. Headnotes to the order of the Second Senate of 15.12.2015. Retrieved from https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2015/12/rs20151215_2bvr273514en.html

Judgement of the Court (Grand Chamber). 19 April 2016. Case C-441/14 Dansk Industri v Estate of Karsten Eigil Rasmussen. Retrieved from https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=176461&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=7264664.

Judgement of the Supreme Court of Denmark. Case 15/2014 Dansk Industri (DI) Ajos A/S v Estate of A. Retrieved from https://www.domstol.dk/media/2udgvvvb/judgment-15-2014.pdf.

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Tsvelikh, M. (2024). The Impact of the Case Law of the EU Court of Justice on Law Enforcement in National Law in the Context of Ukraine’s Integration into the European Union. Problems of Legality, (167), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.167.314354

Issue

Section

Articles