Mediation in Public-Law Disputes: an Innovative Approach to the Protection of Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.166.312519Keywords:
mediation, public-law dispute, protection of human rightsAbstract
The relevance of the research topic is explained by the need to improve instruments for resolving public law disputes in the context of new challenges in the field of human rights protection. Mediation attracts attention as a potentially effective tool for resolving such disputes, especially when traditional judicial procedures do not provide sufficient fairness and efficiency, thereby reducing citizens’ trust in the judicial system. The use of mediation promotes more effective implementation of constitutional provisions and offers new mechanisms for the protection of citizens’ rights, ensuring flexibility and an individual approach to each specific dispute. The purpose of the research is to analyse mediation as a tool for resolving public law disputes and to determine its role and effectiveness in protecting human rights in Ukraine. Achieving this goal was made possible through the use of scientific methods, in particular, the systemic method (to consider mediation as a holistic phenomenon within the legal system), the formal-legal method (to analyse the relevant legal acts), the methods of analysis and synthesis (to detail specific aspects of the problem and generalise the obtained data), and the method of generalisation (to form general conclusions and recommendations). The research results showed that mediation has significant potential to improve the process of resolving public law disputes and to enhance the level of human rights protection. Its application facilitates faster and more efficient conflict resolution, reduces financial and time costs, and helps preserve relationships between the parties, contributing to the development of a culture of peaceful dispute settlement. The introduction of mediation into Ukrainian legal practice can significantly increase the effectiveness of citizens’ rights protection and trust in state institutions. Further scientific research includes the development of specific recommendations for the regulatory support of mediation in public law disputes in Ukraine, adaptation of best international practices to the national context, analysis of potential obstacles, and ways to overcome them. Research into the effectiveness of mediator training and raising citizens’ awareness of mediation possibilities can facilitate the wider implementation of this tool.
References
Karmazа, O.O., Fedorenko, T.V., & Pozov, D.A. (2022). Mediation as an Alternative Mechanism for Dispute and Conflict Resolution: Issues in the Disclosure of Terms Used in the Law. Kyiv University Law Bulletin, 2-4, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.2-4.2022.12.
Kryshtal, H., & Bryukhovetska, I. (2023). Alternative Legal Remedy for Human Rights: Mediation. Scientific Works of the Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Legal Sciences, 2(65), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.32689/2522-4603.2023.2.3.
Law of Ukraine No. 1875-IX "On Mediation". (November 16, 2021). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1875-20#Text/.
Law of Ukraine No. 2747-IV "Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine". (July 6, 2005). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/2747-15/.
Yarema, O.H. (2024). Alternative Forms of Resolution of Administrative-Legal Disputes. Analytical-Comparative Jurisprudence, 1, 467-471. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.01.83.
Constitution of Ukraine. (June 28, 1996). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text.
Law of Ukraine No. 2073-IX "On Administrative Procedure". (February, 17 2022). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/2073-20.
Recommendation Rec (2001) 9 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on alternatives to litigation between administrative authorities and private parties: Adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe at the 762nd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies. (September, 5 2001). Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/Rec_2001_9_2001_09_05.pdf.
Mahmutovic A., & Alhamoudi A. (2024). Understanding the Relationship between the Rule of Law and Sustainable Development. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 1(22), 170-197. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.1-a000102.
Pawłowska E., Witkowski P., & Trybus P. (2021). Mediation as an innovative dispute resolution tool 2 based on the example of public organizations. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 150, 169-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2021.150.13.
Healing the Wounds of Conflict. Mediation Can Help. (2024). Kyiv: RACIO. https://www.mediation-help.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/zczilennya-ran-konfliktu-.pdf.
Chorna, S. (2022). The Role of the Judiciary in the Constitutional-Legal Mechanism for the Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms. Entrepreneurship, Economy, and Law, 8. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.8.30.
Ivanytsia, A. (2022). Mediation as a Method of Resolving Legal Disputes Under Martial Law. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, Special Issue, 2, 511-517. https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2022-6-511-517.
Khovpun, O., Kichuk, Ya., Petrenko, A., Dombrovska, O., & Metil, A. (2024). Mediation as a Tool for Resolving Conflicts in Criminal Proceedings in Wartime. Social and Legal Studies, 7(2), 264-272. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals2.2024.264.
Luchenko, D.V., & Kostina, D.A. (2023). Mediation in Administrative Law Proceeding: Comparative Legal Analysis of the Legislation of the Federal Republic of Germany and Ukraine. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 2(24), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2023.2.293046.
Yatskovyna, V.V. (2022). International Standards in the Field of Human Rights Protection. Southern Ukrainian Legal Journal, 1-2, 49-1. https://doi.org/10.32850/sulj.2022.1-2.9.
Kormych, A., Zavalniuk, V., Todoshchak, O., & Ulianov, O. (2024). Ukraine’s Europeanization of Public Administration and Harmonizing Customs Legislation – Exploring a Pluralistic Approach. Lex Portus, 10(4), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.62821/lp10402.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Діана Костіна
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.