Financial sanction as a generic and specific construction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.166.308102Keywords:
financial responsibility, financial crime, financial sanction, fine, private law regulation of liability, administrative fineAbstract
The relevance of the research topic is determined by the analysis of the problems of responsibility for the consequences of the circulation of public funds and the grounds for the application of fines. If the trend of using these means in civil-law regulation is absolutely clear and stable, then certain contradictions are connected with the application of fines in the regime of economic-law regulation. The purpose of the article is to evaluate tax control measures that reflect the specifics of the application of financial sanctions depending on the specifics of industry regulation. Achieving the set goal is based on identifying the basic principles of clarifying the legal nature of the financial sanction and detailing the specifics of its application depending on the subject area of individual industries. Elucidation of the nature of a certain complex structure - "administrative-economic fine" - is of particular importance. The latter has become very widely used in the regulation of relations in the sphere of circulation of financial resources. The research uses a broad approach to the analysis of methods of scientific knowledge. The system method is implemented in the assessment of the grounds for the existence of a single system of financial sanctions regardless of the specifics of a separate industry. A similar system consists of variants of fines that are applied in criminal, administrative, financial, civil, economic law. A corresponding continuation of the system method is the method of comparative analysis. Applying it in the work, attention is focused on common features that express the nature of the fine and the specifics of its application depending on the specifics of the subject regulation of each industry. The reconciliation of the grounds for calculation and the nature of fines depending on the industry regulation is studied. Variants of harmonizing the legislation regulating the occurrence of adverse consequences in the form of the application of a fine during the consideration of disputes with the participation of a subject of authority are considered. It is emphasized that there are no grounds for determining adverse consequences for the payer based on the complex design of inter-branch regulation, namely the application of the design of "administrative-economic fine". The level and availability of scientific studies related to the generalization of the procedure for calculating fines in the regime of private and public regulation, as well as the state of judicial practice in resolving similar disputes, were analyzed. On the basis of the conducted research, conclusions were drawn and recommendations were made regarding the application of financial sanctions both within certain industries and at the border of public and private regulation.
References
Kucheryavenko, M.P. (2023). Legal Prohibition: Tax Aspect. Law of Ukraine, 7, 128-141.
Kucheryavenko, M.P., & Kotenko, A.M. (2023). To the problem of the ratio of the amount of sanctions in the mode of achieving a balance of interests (on the example of payment of duties). Problems of Legality, 162, 76-93.
Kotenko, A., Bondarenko, I., Kucheryavenko, & M., Zaverukha, O. (2023). A Comparison of Tax Compliance Tools in Ukraine with Select European Countries. European Taxation, 63(10), Pp. 423-431. https://doi.org/10.59403/25j8rah.
Kucheryavenko, M.P. (March 15, 2024). Tax disputes as a conflict of jurisdiction. In Problematic issues of resolving tax disputes in the conditions of martial law: according to the materials of the international science and practice conference. A. Begunts M. Kucheryavenka (Eds.) (pp. 63-67). Kharkiv: Pravo.
Golovashevych, O., Bondarenko, I., Kotenko, A., Kucheryavenko, M., & Zaverukha, O. (2024). Mediation in the Resolution of Tax Disputes: Advantages, Application Experience, Prospects for Implementation in Ukraine. Danube, 15(1), P. 73–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2024-0004.
Tatsii, V.Ya., Tyutyugin, V.I., Borisov, V.I. et al. (2020). Criminal Law of Ukraine: General part. V.Ya. Tatsii, V.I. Tyutyugin, & V.I. Borisov (Eds.). Kharkiv: Pravo.
Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2001). Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 25-26, art. 131.
Bytyak, Yu.P., Balakareva, I.M., & Boyko, I.V. et al. (2020). Administrative Law. Yu.P. Bytyak (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo.
Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. (1984). Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukrainian SSR., ap. to 51, art. 1122.
Tax Code of Ukraine. (2011). Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 13-14, 15-16, 17, art. 112.
Borysova, V.I., Spasio-Fateeva, I.V., & Yarotskyi, V.L. (Eds.). (2011). Civil Law. (Vols. 1-2). Vol. 1. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Civil Code of Ukraine. (2003). Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 40-44, art. 356.
Zadykhailo, D.V., & Pashkov, V.M. (Eds.). (2012). Commercial Law. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Kozyuba, E. (Ed.). (2015). General Theory of Law. Kyiv: Waite.
Petryshyn, O.V., Pogrebnyak, S.P., Smorodynskyi, V.S. et al. The theory of the state and law. O.V. Petryshyn. (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Олег Бібік
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.