Administrative silence as the challenge in regulation of administrative proceedings. Best practices and successful measures adopted by selected EU countries in the context of Ukrainian law "on administrative procedure"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.163.294425Keywords:
administrative silence, administrative procedure, reform, rule of law, administrative proceedings, public administrationAbstract
The issue of administrative silence is a significant challenge not only for the countries undergoing structural legal reforms, but also in established democracies with stable rule of law systems. Administrative inaction or delayed activity pose serious problems for the citizens, impact their individual rights, but also questions the overall effectiveness of public administration. In general, two models of addressing this case of maladministration are adopted: the negative (where silence means tacit rejection) and positive (where silence means approval). However, in practice of many countries, the solutions are mixed and much more complex. The effective way of dealing with administrative silence seems to be a matter of practice of public administration bodies, good cooperation with administrative courts, and respectful approach to individual rights of the citizens. Ukraine is currently undergoing a major reform of administrative procedure. The newly adopted and currently implemented Law on Administrative Procedure (LAP) provides a comprehensive approach to regulation of administrative proceedings and addresses many challenges relating to the operation of public administration. It is important to test the new solutions and observe how they function in practice, as well as to identify potential weaknesses and possibilities for improvement. Administrative silence, as a substantial challenge to the proper functioning of public administration, needs to be effectively addressed by the legal norms and practice, possibly with the inspiration of the good practices from the other European countries.
References
Kovac, P., Tolsma, H., & Dragos, D. C. (2020). In Search of an Effective Model: A Comparative Outlook on Administrative Silence in Europe. In D.C. Dragos, P. Kovač, & H. D. Tolsma (Eds.). The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law (pp. 3-29). Palgrave MacMillan. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3690229.
Aberastury P. (Ed.). (2023). Administrative Silence. Ius Comparatum Series, Larcier Intersentia.
Batalli, M. (2017). Consequences of Administrative Silence in Public Administration. SEER: Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, 20(1), 139-152. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26379912.
European Court of Human Rights’ Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. URL: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/guide_art_6_criminal_eng.
Athanasiadou, N., & Eliantonio, M. (2020). Silence of the EU Authorities: the Legal Consequences of Inaction by the EU Administration. In D.C. Dragos, P. Kovac, & H.D. Tolsma. (Eds.). The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law (pp. 33-63). Palgrave Macmillan. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3690229.
Kmieciak, Z. (Ed). (2021). Administrative Proceedings in the Habsburg Succession Countries. Łódź-Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Valcárcel, F.P., Fernández, A.R., & Sistero, R.S. (2020). The sound of Silence in Spain. In The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law (241-278). Palgrave Macmillan. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3690229.
The Administration and You. Principles of Administrative Law Concerning the Relations Between Administrative Authorities and Private Persons. Handbook. (1996). Council of Europe Publishing. URL: https://rm.coe.int/1680700263.
Commercial contracts in Germany. URL: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ba82705a-1e5b-4fc3-bd90-adc5ba8215b0.
Engewald, B. (2020). Administrative Silence in Germany. In D.C. Dragos, P. Kovač, & H.D.Tolsma (Eds.). The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law (67-106). Palgrave Macmillan. URL: URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3690229.
Chevalier, E. (2020). Silence in French Administrative System: A Failed Revolution? In The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law (107-145). Palgrave Macmillan. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3690229.
Graaf, K.J. de, Hoogstra. N.G., & Marseille, A.T. (2020). Remedies Against Administrative Silence in the Netherlands in: The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law. Palgrave Macmillan. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3690229.
Jurkowska Gomulka, A., Kurczewska, K., Kurzępa-Dedo, K., & Sześciło, D. (2020). Administrative Silence: a Polish Perspective. In D.C. Dragos, P. Kovač, H.D.Tolsma. (Eds.). The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law. (433-457). Palgrave Macmillan. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3690229.
Wierzbowski M., Stankiewicz R. (Eds.) (2022). Postępowanie Administracyjne i Sądowoadministracyjne. 3 wyd. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
A User’s Guide to Administrative Decision Making. Delivering Good Decisions. (October, 2019). Law Institute Victoria. URL: https://www.liv.asn.au/PDF/For-Lawyers/Practice-Sections/Admin/GuideAdmistrativeDecisionMaking.aspx/.
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). Principles on the Protection and Promotion of the Ombudsman Institution ("The Venice Principles"). Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 118th Plenary Session (Venice, 15-16 March 2019).
