UN General Assembly Resolution 76/262 as a strengthening of the collective response to the use of the veto right in the UN Security Council
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.164.292237Keywords:
maintaining international peace and security;, main UN bodies reform;, Standing Mandate;, Uniting for Peace;, international conflict.Abstract
The article describes the legal nature of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 76/262 (A/76/L.52) entitled "Standing mandate for a General Assembly debate when a veto is cast in the Security Council", adopted on April 26, 2022. We have analyzed this topic due to its relevance and the emergence of a new procedure of the United Nations General Assembly, aimed at increasing of the transparency and accountability of the United Nations Security Council, as a result of the ineffective activity of the Security Council in crisis in which our world finds itself today, in particular due to armed conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, which have led to complex humanitarian consequences. Many states and scientists have been expressing their interest in the issue of Security Council reform for a long time. We deeply researched the Resolution which is the first in a long time and a significant legal instrument that changes the existing mechanism of the functioning of the United Nations and has revived the discussions on the need for a complete reform of the Security Council in accordance with Resolution 62/557 of December 15, 2008. The purpose of the article is an overview of the new Resolution 76/262, namely the reasons and expediency of its adoption, cases of application and its effectiveness in modern conditions. The methodological basis of the study are the following general scientific and special methods of cognition of legal phenomena: the method of the philosophical level – the dialectical method; empirical methods – comparative, observation and description methods; general logical methods – analysis, synthesis; specially-legal method. The article analyzes the main provisions of Resolution 76/262, the reasons for its adoption, examines cases of its application, and draws conclusions about the effectiveness of this resolution. We have differentiated the procedures provided for by Resolution 76/262 "Standing mandate for a General Assembly debate when a veto is cast in the Security Council" and Resolution 377 (V) "Uniting for Peace". We have reviewed the international legal conceptual foundations of the need to apply the resolution. The topic of reforming the United Nations against the backdrop of the current world security crisis is very important and relevant for further research by domestic scientists in order to formulate their own proposals, approaches and scientific justifications in the modern Ukrainian science of international public law, as well as for the scientific enlightenment of society in this of knowledge.
References
Renov, E.V. (2023). Reform of the United Nations Security Council: problems and prospects. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 1, 538-541. https://doi. org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-1/124.
Niland Paul. (October 12, 2023). Russia’s Ukraine invasion highlights the need for fundamental UN reform. Atlantic Council. Retrieved from https://www.atlanticcouncil. org/blogs/ukrainealert/russias-ukraine-invasion-highlights-the-need-for-fundamental- un-reform/.
Political statement on the suspension of the veto in case of mass atrocities. (August 1, 2015). Retrieved from https://www.globalr2p.org/resources/political-declaration-on- suspension-of-veto-powers-in-cases-of-mass-atrocities/.
List of Supporters of the Political Declaration on Suspension of Veto. (July 13, 2022). Retrieved from https://www.globalr2p.org/resources/list-of-supporters-of-the- political-declaration-on-suspension-of-veto/.
Accountability, Coherence and Transparency (ACT) Group Submission to the United Nations, A/70/621-S/2015/978. (December 14, 2015). Retrieved from https://www. globalr2p.org/resources/code-of-conduct-regarding-security-council-action-against- genocide-crimes-against-humanity-or-war-crimes/.
Permanent Mission of Liechtenstein to the United Nations: List of Supporters of the Code of Conduct regarding Security Council action against genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes, as elaborated by ACT. (June 8, 2022). Retrieved from https:// www.globalr2p.org/resources/list-of-signatories-to-the-act-code-of-conduct/.
Adams, Barbara, & Lent, Marina. (2023). Sustainable Peace in Times of Multidimensional Crises: The UN and the Security Council. New York: Published by the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. Retrieved from https://rosalux.nyc/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/RLS- NYC-GPS-UN-Reform.pdf.
Guterres, Antуnio. A New Agenda for Peace. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-agenda-peace-ant%25C3%25B3nio-guterr es/?trackingId=fiu%2F3vWAJTaPcuPBwvYo%2Fw%3D%3D.
Mahmutovic, Adnan. (2023). Did Russia Invade International Law in Ukraine. Special Issue Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 1-17. Retrieved from https://ajee-journal.com/ upload/attaches/att_1679579347.pdf. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-6S003.
Grzebyk, Patrycja. (2022). Escalation of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine in 2022 in light of the law on use of force and international humanitarian law. Polish Yearbook of International Law, XLI, 145-162. Retrieved from https://www.academia.
ISSN 2414-990X. Problems of Legality. 2024. Issue 164 263 Сердюк В. М. Резолюція Генеральної Асамблеї ООН 76/262 як посилення колективної відповіді...
edu/88288681/Escalation_of_the_conflict_between_Russia_and_Ukraine_in_2022_
in_light_of_the_law_on_use_of_force_and_international_humanitarian_law.
Fedorenko, V.L., & Fedorenko, M.V. (2022). Russia’s Military Invasion of Ukraine in 2022: Aim, Reasons, and Implications. Krytyka Prawa, 14, p. 7-42. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/91153115/Russia_s_Military_Invasion_of_Ukraine_
in_2022_Aim_Reasons_and_Implications.
United Nations Charter. (June, 1945). Retrieved from: https://unic.un.org/
aroundworld/unics/common/documents/publications/uncharter/UN%20Charter_
Ukrainian.pdf.
Peters Anne. (2023). The war in Ukraine and the curtailment of the veto in the Security
Council. Revue Européenne du Droit, War, 5. Retrieved from https://geopolitique. eu/en/articles/the-war-in-ukraine-and-the-curtailment-of-the-veto-in-the-security- council/.
Resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations No. 76/262 "Standing mandate for a General Assembly debate when a veto is cast in the Security Council". (April, 2022). Retrieved from https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/ N22/330/40/PDF/N2233040.pdf?OpenElement.
Barber, Rebecca. (April 26, 2023). The U.N. General Assembly’s Veto Initiative Turns One. Is it Working? Just Security. Retrieved from https://www.justsecurity.org/86140/ the-u-n-general-assemblys-veto-initiative-turns-one-is-it-working/.
Official Records General Assembly Seventy-sixth session 69th plenary meeting, A/76/PV.69. (April, 2022). Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/ 3987582?ln=en.
Resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations No. A/RES/ES-11/4 "Territorial integrity of Ukraine: defending the principles of the Charter of the United Nations". (October, 2022). Retrieved from https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/ cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/a_res_es_11_4.pdf.
Resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations No A/RES/ES-11/5 "Furtherance of remedy and reparation for aggression against Ukraine". (November, 2022). Retrieved from https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/ N22/693/55/PDF/N2269355.pdf?OpenElement.
Debate on the Annual Report of the Security Council (A/77/2) under agenda item 27. (June 30, 2023). Statement by H.E. the Permanent Representative of Portugal to the United Nations in New York, Ambassador Ana Paula Zacarias, on behalf of the ACT Group. Retrieved from https://estatements.unmeetings.org/ estatements/10.0010/20230630100000000/2DmX3pwVA3o6/8tt00sG0SXlt_en.pdf.
Resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations No. 377(V) "Uniting for peace". (November, 1950). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/sc/repertoire/ otherdocs/GAres377A(v).pdf.
Arcari, Maurizio. (2022). The conflict in Ukraine and the hurdles of collective action. QIL, Zoom-out, 96, 7-25. Retrieved from http://www.qil-qdi.org/wp-content/ uploads/2022/12/02_Ukraine-Conflict-_ARCARI_3.pdf.
Bukar, Muhammad Ibrahim. (2023). Russia’s War Against Ukraine: A Contravention of International Humanitarian Law. American Journal of Society and Law (AJSL), 2(1), 30-35. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/101659457/Russia_s_War_ against_Ukraine_A_Contravention_of_International_Humanitarian_Law.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Valentyn Serdiuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.