Online Platforms and New Challenges for Modern Law on E-Commerce

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.162.284666

Keywords:

online platforms, sharing economy, platform operator, contract law, online intermediary service, e-commerce

Abstract

This article provides a legal analysis of the nature of online platforms. The subject of the article is widely discussed among modern legal scholars since the legal nature of online platforms is very controversial: it is hard to determine the very essence of services provided by platform operators as well as to ensure fair balance of interests between platform operators and their users. The aim of the article is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relationships emerging between platforms and their users and to show the main challenges brought about by online platforms for the legal regulation and for legal practice. The author starts with analyzing the notion of online platforms and their role in the transformation of modern economy. A special attention is paid on the essence of sharing economy which is considered as a product of platforms’ activity. Then the legal nature of relationships between platforms and their users is explored, i.e. operator-supplier and operator-customer relationships. In this regard, various cases concerning these relationships as well as the most recent European legal acts regulating platforms are analyzed. The main problems arising in practice of platforms’ activities are discussed and the need to provide an appropriate regulation to address them is explained.

Author Biography

Nataliia Filatova-Bilous, Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

кандидатка юридичних наук, доцентка, доцентка кафедри цивільного судочинства,

арбітражу і міжнародного приватного права

 

References

European Commission. (2016). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the regions – A European agenda for the collaborative economy COM/2016/356. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0356.

Critical assessment of European Agenda for the collaborative economy - Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.astrid-online.it/static/upload/ep_i/ep_imco_sharing_assessment_02_2017.pdf.

Lobel, O. (2016). The Law of the Platform. Minnesota Law Review, 101(1), 87-166.

Cohen, J.E. (2017). Law for the Platform Economy. U.C. Davis Law Review, 51(1), 133-204.

Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Annexes Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services SWD(2018) 139 final Proposal for a Regulation on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services 2018/0112 (COD).

Oberdorf v. Amazon.com Inc, No. 18-1041 (United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. July 3, 2019). Retrieved from https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca3/18-1041/18-1041-2019-07-03.html.

Bolger v. Amazon.com, LLC, No. 37-2017-00003009-CU-PL-CTL (Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District. Division One, State of California August 13, 2020). Retrieved from https://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2020/d075738.html.

de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R.C. (2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3.

Judgement of 20 December 2017, Uber Systems Spain SL, C-434/15, EU:C:2017:981.

Judgement of 19 December 2019, Airbnb Ireland, C-390/18, EU:C:2019:1112.

Judgement of 12 July 2011, L’Oréal SA and Others v eBay International AG and Others, C-324/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:474, points 122, 124.

Judgement of 23 March 2010, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA, Case C-236/08, ECLI:EU:C:2010:159.

Directive (EU) 2019/2161 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directives 98/6/EC, 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the better enforcement and modernisation of Union consumer protection rules (Text with EEA relevance), 32019L2161, EP, CONSIL, OJ L 328 7 (2019).

Regulation 2019/1150 on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services. (July 11, 2019). Official Journal of the European Union, 186, 57-80.

Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (Text with EEA relevance) OJ L 277. (October 27, 2022). Official Journal of the European Union, 65, 1-102.

De las Heras Ballell, T. R. (2017). The Legal Anatomy of Electronic Platforms: A Prior Study to Assess the Need of a Law of Platforms in the EU. Italian Law Journal, 3(1), 149-176.

Filatova-Bilous, Nataliia. (2021). Once again platform liability: On the edge of the "Uber" and "Airbnb" cases. Internet Policy Review, 10(2), 1-27.

Twigg-Flesner, C. (2018). The EU’s Proposals for Regulating B2B Relationships on Online Platforms – Transparency, Fairness and Beyond. Journal of European Consumer and Markets Law, 6, 222-233.

Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Annexes Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services SWD(2018) 139 final.

Proposal for a Regulation on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services 2018/0112 (COD).

Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market ("Directive on electronic commerce"), 32000L0031, CONSIL, EP. OJ L, 178 (2000). Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/31/oj/eng.

Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services (Text with EEA relevance), 32015L1535, EP, CONSIL. OJ L, 241. (2015). Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2015/1535/oj/eng.

Sandfeld Jakobsen, S., & Ostergaard, K. (2019). Platform Intermediaries in the Sharing Economy: Questions of Liability and Remedy. Nordic Journal of Commercial Law, 1, 20-41. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.njcl.v0i1.3299.

Law of Ukraine No. 675-VIII "On Electronic Commerce". (September 3, 2015). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/675-19#Text.

Marie Jull Sørensen. (2018). Intermediary Platforms – The Contractual Legal Framework. Nordic Journal of Commercial Law, 1, 62-90. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.njcl.v0i1.2485.

Law of Ukraine No. 3153-IX "On consumer protection". (June 10, 2023). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3153-20#Text.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-29

How to Cite

Filatova-Bilous, N. (2023). Online Platforms and New Challenges for Modern Law on E-Commerce. Problems of Legality, (162), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.162.284666

Issue

Section

Articles