The Change of the Court’s Case Territorial Jurisdiction (Venue) – a Tool for Ensuring the Accessibility of Administrative Justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.161.278568

Keywords:

administrative jurisdiction, administrative court’s case territorial jurisdiction (venue), access to justice, accessibility of administrative justice

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the institution of change of territorial jurisdiction (venue) in administrative cases. The relevance of the topic is determined by the absence of specialized scientific research in the theory of administrative justice, devoted to studying the peculiarities of applying extraterritorial jurisdiction and its role in ensuring access to the administrative judicial process. The purpose of the article is to investigate issues related to the possibility of changing territorial jurisdiction (venue) in administrative cases, to determine the possibilities and limitations of applying this tool in order to ensure the accessibility of administrative justice for individuals. The research is based on the systemic-structural method, which allows for a comprehensive study of the procedure and grounds for changing territorial jurisdiction (venue) in administrative cases under martial law. It also reveals the connection and interaction of the principle of extraterritorial jurisdiction with the principles of accessibility of administrative justice. The dialectical, formal-legal, analysis and synthesis methods, among others, were also applied.The scientific article examines the issue of ensuring the accessibility of administrative justice through the prism of changing the territorial jurisdiction (venue) of court cases. The author examines the concepts and types of jurisdiction of administrative cases with a focus on the legal nature of territorial jurisdiction (venue) in administrative proceedings. The article is devoted to the study of the possibility to change the territorial jurisdiction (venue) of administrative cases. The advantages and disadvantages of using this mechanism and its role in ensuring access to justice in administrative cases are determined. Based on the application of the system-structural method of research, a comprehensive study of the procedure and grounds for changing the territorial jurisdiction(venue) of administrative cases under martial law was carried out, the connection and interaction of the principle of extraterritorial jurisdiction with the principles of accessibility of administrative justice was revealed. The content of legal acts dedicated to the regulation of the procedural order and features of changing the territorial jurisdiction (venue) of cases in administrative proceedings was analyzed. The practice of applying the instrument of changing territorial jurisdiction (venue) in cases considered by administrative courts to ensure the accessibility of administrative justice during emergencies has been studied. It was concluded that the application of extraterritorial jurisdiction of administrative cases is an effective tool for ensuring the accessibility of administrative justice, a means of ensuring the constitutional right to judicial protection and preventing its restriction even in emergencies.

Author Biography

Aurika Paskar, Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Procedural Law

 

References

Constitution of Ukraine (1996, June) with amendments. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр.

Law of Ukraine No. 389-VIII ′′On the Legal Regime of Martial Law′′. (May 12, 2015). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/389-19#Text.

Law of Ukraine No. 1402-VIII ′′On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges′′. (June 2, 2016). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text.

Kamminga, M. (2020). Extraterritoriality. The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. R. Wolfrum (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.

Extra-territorial jurisdiction of States Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Extraterritorial_jurisdiction_ENG.pdf.https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/fs_extra-territorial_jurisdiction_eng.pdf

Hudyma, D. (2015). Principle of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in the European Court of Human Rights Practice. Law of Ukraine, 2, 113-127.

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (November 4, 1950). Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004.

Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine. (July 6, 2005). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text.

Osadchy, A.Yu. (2011). Cognizance of administrative cases. Current Problems of State and Law, 60, 344-351.

Gordeev, V.V. (2011). The current issues of defining the substantive jurisdiction of administrative cases. Journal of the High Council of Justice, 3, 25-41.

Bevzenko, V.M. (2016). Jurisdiction administrative affairs: criteria and types. Juridical scientific and electronic journal, 2, 186-187.

Biluga, S.V. (2011). Concept and Role of «Suability» Institute in the Administrative Trial. Current Problems of State and Law, 58, 253-258.

Judicial System of Ukraine. Catalog of Legal Positions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (based on decisions and opinions). Official website of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ccu.gov.ua/storinka-knygy/551-sudova-systema-ukrayiny.

Myroniuk, R.V. (2019). Features of the Judicial Examination of Certain Categories of Administrative Cases: Tutorial. Dnipro, 92.

Decision of the Supreme Court composed of a panel of judges of the Administrative Cassation Court No. 640/12339/19, administrative proceedings No. A/9901/ (March 5, 2020). Retrieved from https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/88062046.

Law of Ukraine No. 1798-VIII ′′On the High Council of Justice′′. (December 21, 2016). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-19#Text.

VKKS publishes data on appointments and vacancies in the courts. Retrieved from https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/226478-vkks-opublikuvala-dani-stosovno-priznachen-ta-vakansiy-u-sudakh.

Law of Ukraine No. 2128-IX ′′On Amendments to Section XII "Final and Transitional Provisions" of the Law of Ukraine ′′On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges′′ regarding the sustainable functioning of the judiciary during the absence of the High Council of Justice′′. (March 15, 2022). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2128-20#Text.

How the judicial system of Ukraine works in wartime - DW interview with Deputy Head of the OP Andriy Smyrnov. Retrieved from https://rsu.gov.ua/ua/news/view/ak-pracue-sudova-sistema-ukraini-v-umovah-vijni-intervu-dw-iz-zastupnikom-kerivnika-op-andriem-smirnovim.

Judges, authorities, and society should shape the European perception of the law when legality does not prevail over justice - Chairman of the High Council of Justice. Retrieved from https://hcj.gov.ua/news/suddyam-vladi-ta-suspilstvu-slid-formuvaty-yevropeyske-spryynyattya-prava-koly-zakonnist-ne.

Courts in evacuation: how the war has changed the map of Ukrainian courts (infographics). Retrieved from https://mipl.org.ua/sudy-v-evakuacziyi-yak-vijna-zminyla-kartu-sudiv-ukrayiny-infografika/.

Law of Ukraine No. 1207-VII ′′On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and the Legal Regime on the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine′′. (April 15, 2014). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1207-18#Text.

Letter of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine "Regarding the change of territorial jurisdiction of court cases located in the territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol". (November 10, 2014). Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v1543760-14.

Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 8-rp/2002. (May, 2002) (case regarding the subordination of acts on the appointment or dismissal of officials). Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v008p710-02.

Decision of the Council of Judges of Ukraine "Regarding the consideration of undistributed cases whose jurisdiction was changed due to the state of war" No. 5. (February, 2023). Retrieved from https://rsu.gov.ua/ua/documents?id=146&page=3&per-page=8.

Case of Sokurenko and Strygun v. Ukraine of 20 July 2006. (Applications No. 29458/04 and 29465/04). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_115#Text.

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Paskar, A. (2023). The Change of the Court’s Case Territorial Jurisdiction (Venue) – a Tool for Ensuring the Accessibility of Administrative Justice. Problems of Legality, (161), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.161.278568

Issue

Section

Articles