Liability for Violation of the Duty of Care and Upbringing in the Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.161.276942

Keywords:

criminal liability, care and upbringing, composition of the crime, legal conclusions of the court

Abstract

The relevance of the topic of research is determined by the fact that the problem of non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment by parents (persons who replace them) of childcare responsibilities exists in all countries, regardless of the form of government, state system and income level of the population. Ukraine is in the process of integration with the European Union, so it is useful to study the foreign legislative approach to regulating responsibility for the violation of these obligations. The aim of the article is to study the German experience of establishing criminal liability for non-fulfillment of childcare obligations. Dogmatic, systemic-structural, statistical, historical-legal, formal-legal research methods were used in the research. Attention is paid to German legislation, which provides for the right and duty of parents to care for and bring up children. The genesis of the criminal law regarding the liability for violation of these duties is given. Statistical data on the number of criminal proceedings and persons convicted of this criminal offense (2010–2021) are summarized. The peculiarities of the structure of the crime provided for in § 171 of the Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany have been studied; objective and subjective characteristics. The analysis was carried out on the basis of the doctrine of German criminal law and the practice of courts of general jurisdiction, in particular the Federal Supreme Court of Germany. The practice of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany was used. Based on the study, conclusions were formulated regarding the definition of: the legal interest that is protected; signs of "gross" violation of duties; criteria for establishing the consequence of the crime, which is provided as the tort of creating danger. The peculiarities of the qualification of the crime in case of its commission in a place where an armed conflict is taking place are noted. The allocation of an independent structural section (subsection) in the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which includes criminal offenses against family, is supported. The discussion of the criminalization of harm caused by a crime provided by Art. 166 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, creating a real threat (danger) of causing harm to the victim is proposed.

 

Author Biographies

Oleksiy Zaytsev, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD in Law, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor of the Department of Criminal Law

Kateryna Pavshuk, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD in Law, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor of the Department of Constitutional Law of Ukraine

References

Filipenko, V.R. (2022). Criminal responsibility for a persistent failure to fulfill a duty of care for a child or adult under guardianship or in the custody. PhD Thesis. Kharkiv: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University.

Dittrich, Tilmann Ein. (2022). Update zum Schutz der kindlichen Entwicklung nach § 171 StGB. Juristische Rundschau, 2, 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1515/juru-2021-0048.

Heribert Ostendorf. (2008). Die strafrechtliche Verantwortung von Eltern und Betreuern bei Kindesvernachlässigung. Zeitschrift für Kindschaftsrecht und Jugendhilfe, 3, 106-110.

Wiss, Mit, Georg Köpferl. (2015). Zu Rechtsgut und Tatbestandsvoraus-setzungen der Verletzung der Fürsorge- und Erziehungspflicht (§ 171 StGB). Anmerkung zum Beschluss des Bundesverfassungsgerichts 2 BvR 920/14 vom 15.10.2014 = HRRS 2015 Nr. 3. Aufsätze und Anmerkungen, 2, 81-84. Retrieved from https://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/archiv/15-02/hrrs-2-15.pdf.

Christine Geisler. (2003). Die strafrechtliche Behandlung von Eltern minderjähriger Täter. Strafbares Unterlassen im Rahmen der unechten Unterlassungsdelikte und § 171 StGB. Doctoral Thesis. Göttingen: Georg-August-Universität.

BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats (Oktober 15, 2014). 2 BvR 920/14, Rn. 1-33. Retrieved from http://www.bverfg.de/e/rk20141015_2bvr092014.html.

Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Retrieved from https://www.bundestag.de/gg/grundrechte.

Bürgerliche Gesetzbuch. Retrieved from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__1626.html.

Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB) – Achtes Buch (VIII) – Kinder- und Jugendhilfe. Retrieved from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/sgb_8/__1.html.

Verordnung zum Schutz von Ehe, Familie und Mutterschaft. (März 9, 1943). Retrieved from http://ns-quellen.at/gesetz_anzeigen_detail.php?gesetz_id=2310&action=B_Read.

§ 170d StGB Strafgesetzbuch für das Deutsche Reich. (Mai 15, 1871). Retrieved from https://lexetius.com/StGB/170d,4.

Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) § 171 Verletzung der Fürsorge- oder Erziehungspflicht. Retrieved from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__171.html.

Datenportal für Deutschland. Retrieved from https://www.govdata.de.

Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de.

Schriftlicher Bericht des Sonderausschusses für die Strafrechtsreform über den von der Bundesregierung eingebrachten Entwurf eines Vierten Gesetzes zur Reform des Strafrechts. (June 14, 1972). Bundestag - Drucksache VI/3521.

Bundesgerichtshof Beschluss AK 56/19 (Oktober 17, 2019). In dem Strafverfahren gegen wegen Kriegsverbrechen. Retrieved from https://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi- bin/rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bgh&Art=en&sid=f5dafed8bc3f38b8342de114ca4c3361&nr=101432&pos=12&anz=24.

Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) 4 StR 61/18 – Beschluss. (November 8, 2018). (LG Zweibrücken). Retrieved from https://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/4/18/4-61-18-1.php?referer=db.

Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) 4 StR 380/20 – Beschluss. (April 14, 2021). (LG Essen). Retrieved from https://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/4/20/4-380-20.php.

Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) 2 StR 298/10 – Beschluss. (August 4, 2010). (LG Köln). Retrieved from https://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/2/10/2-298-10.php.

Hessisches Schulgesetz (Schulgesetz – HSchG). In der Fassung. (Juni 14, 2005). Retrieved from https://www.rv.hessenrecht.hessen.de/bshe/document/jlr-SchulGHE2005pP182.

Bundesgerichtshof Beschluss AK 56/19. (Oktober 17, 2019). In dem Strafverfahren gegen wegen Kriegsverbrechen. Retrieved from https://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bgh&Art=en&sid=f5dafed8bc3f38b8342de114ca4c3361&nr=101432&pos=12&anz=24.

Bundesgerichtshof Beschluss AK 14/22. (April 21, 2022). In dem Ermittlungsverfahren gegen. Retrieved from https://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bgh&Art=en&sid=f5dafed8bc3f38b8342de114ca4c3361&nr=129400&pos=3&anz=24.

Bundesgerichtshof Beschluss AK 33/22. (Oktober 18, 2022). In dem Strafverfahren gegen. Retrieved from https://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bgh&Art=en&sid=f5dafed8bc3f38b8342de114ca4c3361&nr=131590&pos=1&anz=24.

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Zaytsev, O. ., & Pavshuk, K. (2023). Liability for Violation of the Duty of Care and Upbringing in the Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. Problems of Legality, (161), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.161.276942

Issue

Section

Articles