Due to the absence of rules for the execution of Madliyah livelihood in the law of the Indonesian religion justice

Authors

  • Edi Marsis
  • . Sudarsono
  • Masruchin Ruba'i
  • Siti Hamidah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.153.223682

Keywords:

legal implications, norms of execution, madliyah livelihood

Abstract

Provisions for the execution of the madliyah livelihood conditions in statutory regulations, especially in the provisions of Article 70 of Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning the Religion Courts as amended by Law Number 3 of 2006 and Law Number 50 of 2009, directly result in a lack of certainty. The law on the right to maintain madliyah livelihood also has direct implications for the trust of society, especially women, in the Religion Courts which should be able to defend women's rights and serve as a bridge to resolve issues of rights that should be obtained, namely madliyah livelihood after divorce. The execution of the wife's madliyah livelihood has implications for the judge's decision, namely: first, the judge does not have a legal basis regarding how the procedure for carrying out the execution that should be carried out for the process of executing the madliyah livelihood. Second, there is no complete regulation up to the implementation of decisions in regulating the rights to support the wife and children - one of which is the madliyah livelihood. Efforts to be able to provide legal certainty for executions at the Religion Courts can be done by completing regulations and building mechanisms.

References

Al-Hayati, Ra'd Kamil. (2004). Solving Family Disputes According to the Qur'an and Sunnah. Yogyakarta: Mitra Pustaka.

Basyir, Ahmad Azhar. (2007). Islamic Marriage Law. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Kamal, Musthafa. (2002). Islamic Fiqh. Yogyakarta: Citra Karsa Mandiri.

Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. (2000). Introduction to Law. Bandung: Alumni.

Lubis, S., Marzuki, H.W.A., & Dewi, G. (2018). The Civil Procedure Code of Religious Courts in Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Radbruch, Gustav. (1975). Rechtsphilosophie. Stuttgart: K.F. Koehler Verlag.

Raharjo, Satjipto. (2000). Law Science. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahman, Abdur. (2002). Complete Explanation of Allah's Laws (Syari'ah). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suadi, Amran. (2018). Peranan Peradilan Agama Dalam Melindungi Hak Perempuan Dan Anak Melalui Putusan Yang Memihak Dan Dapat Dilaksanakan / The Role of Religious Court in Women and Children Rights Protection Through Partial and Executable Decision. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7 (3), 353. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.353-374.

Swantoro, Heri. (2018). Execution Dilemma When Civil Execution is at a Crossroads of Learning from the District Court. Jakarta: Komunikasindo.

Zein, Satria Effendi M. (2004). Problematic Contemporary Islamic Family Law. Jakarta: Kencana.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-01

How to Cite

Marsis, E., Sudarsono, ., Ruba’i, M. ., & Hamidah, S. (2021). Due to the absence of rules for the execution of Madliyah livelihood in the law of the Indonesian religion justice. Problems of Legality, (153), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.153.223682

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL LAW