Civil-law characteristics of the terms of wrap license agreements

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.157.256922

Keywords:

wrap license agreements, public license agreement, license agreement based on public offer, terms of the contract, essential terms

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the most significant features of the terms of wrap license agreements. In the domestic civil law science, the outlined topics are not properly developed. At the same time, the process of Ukrainian Civil Law recoding, attempts to reform both the Contract Law general principles and the provisions on disposal of intellectual property rights agreements, as well as globalization and European integration processes strengthening require intensification of scientific efforts. The author considers the features of wrap license agreements that directly affect their content. The contract theory and practice of the USA, Canada and the United Kingdom in the relevant field are analyzed and generalized. On this basis, the subject of wrap license agreements is formulated as the permission to use the objects of copyright and (or) related rights. It is proposed at the Civil Code of Ukraine level to consolidate the possibility of granting only non-exclusive licenses under the studied agreements. It is emphasized that under these agreements only the right to use the object of intellectual property rights could be provided. It is proved that the use of the object of copyright and (or) related rights for functional purposes coexists with its proper legal use. It is pointed to the need to ensure the possibility of temporary use of such an object outside Ukraine, if there is no term concerning the territory in the agreement. It is noted that when the licensor establishes the auto-prolongation of wrap license agreements, the licensee must be duly warned about this and provided with a transparent possibility to refuse the prolongation. The importance of establishing the non-paid presumption of wrap license agreements is substantiated. The most common in the software and databases mass markets payment models for the use of copyright and (or) related rights are named. Finally, it is concluded that it is necessary to conduct further research of the wrap license agreements and to enshrine them into the civil legislation of Ukraine.

Author Biography

K. Anisimov, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD student, Civil Law Department No 2

References

Hetman, A.P., Borysova, V.I., Yevsieiev, O.P. et al. (2012). Dohovir yak universalna pravova konstruktsiia / A. P. Hetman, V. I. Borysova (Eds.). Kharkiv : Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Kyryliuk, A.V. (2010). Litsenziy̆nyi dohovir na vykorystannia literaturnykh tvoriv (tsyvilno-pravovyi aspekt). Candidate’s thesis. Odesa [in Ukrainian].

Brahynskyy̆, M.Y., Vytrianskyi, V.V. (1999). Dohovornoe pravo. Knyha pervaia: Obshchye polozhenyia: Yzd. 2-e, yspr. Moscow: «Statut» [in Russian].

Vavylyn, E.V. (2009). Osushchestvlenye i zashchyta hrazhdanskykh prav: monohrafyia. Moscow: Volters Kluver [in Russian].

Kyryliuk, A.V. (2008). Litsenziinyi dohovir na vykorystannia literaturnykh tvoriv za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava, 42, 58–65 [in Ukrainian].

Kalynycheva, E.P. (2011). Lytsenzyonnыi dohovor kak osnovanye voznyknovenyia obiazatelstva. Candidate’s thesis. Rostov-na-Donu [in Russian].

Barishev, S.A. (2002). Avtorskyi dohovor v hrazhdanskom prave Rossyi, Frantsyi i Shveitsaryi: sravnytelno-pravovoi analyz. Kazan [in Russian].

Shuvaev, V.A. (2009). Hrazhdansko-pravovoe rehulyrovanye lytsenzyonnoho dohovora na yspolzovanye rezultata yntellektualnoi deiatelnosty yly sredstva yndyvydualyzatsyy. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].

Smorodyna, A.Ye. (2021). Litsenziinyi dohovir u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Vytko, V.S. (2009). Lytsenzyonnyi dohovor: pravovaia pryroda, sushchestvennye uslovyia, konstruktsyia, forma. Khoziaistvo i pravо, 1, 3–48 [in Ukrainian].

Kryzhna, V.M. (1999). Litsenziy̆nyi dohovir – forma realizatsii patentnykh prav. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Hudyma, M.M. (2013). Do pytannia pro poniattia predmeta tsyvilnoho dohovoru. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia «Pravo», issue 23, part 1, vol. 1, 182–186 [in Ukrainian].

Shymon, S.I. (2011). Obiekt i predmet dohovoru i tsyvilnoho pravovidnoshennia: notatky do naukovoi dyskusii. Yurydychna Ukraina, 4, 58–64 [in Ukrainian].

Zamotaeva, T.B. (2005). Sootnoshenye predmeta dohovora, predmeta s obekta dohovornoho obiazatelstva. Pravovaia polytyka y pravovaia zhyzn, 2, 179–184 [in Ukrainian].

Pro avtorske pravo i sumizhni prava: Proiekt Zakonu Ukrainy vid 09.06.2021 r. № 5552-4. URL: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=72188 (data zvernennia: 13.05.2022).

Epstein, M.A., Politano, F.L. (2017). Drafting License Agreements: 4th edition. New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer.

Anderson, M., Warner, V. A–Z (2006). Guide to Boilerplate and Commercial Clauses: 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Bloomsbury Professional.

Shkopiak, T. Licensing – Exclusive / Non-Exclusive / Sole: contractual practice analysis. Taylor Wessing law firm blog. URL: https://www.taylorwessing.com/synapse/commerical_exclusive_nonexclusive.html (last accessed: 13.05.2022).

Dozortsev, V.A. (2003). Yntellektualnыe prava: Poniatye. Systema. Zadachy kodyfykatsyy: sbornyk statei. Moscow: Statut [in Russian].

Biliaieva, O. (2017). Kompiuterni prohramy. Bukhhalterskyi tyzhden, 38. URL: https://i.factor.ua/ukr/journals/bn/2017/september/issue-38/article-30559.html (data zvernennia: 13.05.2022).

Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs: 25.05.2009 date of effect. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:32009L0024 (last accessed: 13.05.2022).

Harris, L.E. Licensing Digital Content: 3rd edition. 2018. URL: https://www.canada.ca/en/heritage-information-network/services/intellectual-property-copyright/guide-developing-digital-licensing-agreement-strategy.html (last accessed: 13.05.2022).

Vytko, V.S. (2012). Hrazhdansko-pravovaia pryroda lytsenzyonnoho dohovora: monohrafyia. Moscow: Statut [in Russian].

Farnsworth, E.A. (1968). Disputes over Omission in Contracts. Columbia Law Review, vol. 68, No. 5, 860–891. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1121035 (last accessed: 13.05.2022).

Vovk, I.A. (2015). Plata za korystuvannia nematerialnymy aktyvamy. Ekonomika intelektualnoi vlasnosti: nauk.-metod. materialy dlia pidhotovky doktorantiv, aspirantiv i mahistriv za napriamom «Intelektualna vlasnist» / L. S. Shevchenko, O. A. Hrytsenko, T. M. Kaminska ta in.; za red. L. S. Shevchenko. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Published

2022-07-06

How to Cite

Anisimov, K. (2022). Civil-law characteristics of the terms of wrap license agreements. Problems of Legality, (157), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.157.256922

Issue

Section

CIVIL LAW AND CIVIL PROCEDURE