Problems of the environmental law of the European Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.155.243720Keywords:
Environmental security, Environmental policy, European Union, Environmental lawAbstract
The problem of ecology is one of the most common problems of the twenty-first century. No country is immune: no country has better military equipment, no country with low inflation, no country with “perfect” legislation.
The purpose of the article was to clarify legislative issues: European Union legislation was outdated, general and lacking in specificity. To address these problems, this article uses different approaches to the definition of environmental security, which makes it necessary to change the concept and the actions within which the definition is adopted.
The article goes on to discuss the position of realists who argue that environmental security cannot be set because of lack of accountability “the importance” of the issue of “high” issues. Thus, the paper refers to the emergence of environmental security and its long path. This article contains the following changes and provisions: Brundtland Committee (1987), Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Habitats in Europe (1979), International Tropical Timber Agreement (1983) as well as the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (1979), the Maastricht Treaty (1992), the Hazardous Substances Directives, the impact of EU measures on the environment and the Animal Protection Directive.
In addition, the article exposes Programs designed to ensure and regulate environmental safety. The report of the European Environment Agency was also reviewed and a comparative analysis of the data contained in the report and the British Broadcasting Corporation estimates was made.
The authors draw attention to several directives, calling them “triumvirate”, which provide the basis for countries to regulate some environmental legislation.
Almost in the end of the paper the authors pay attention to the phenomenon of environmental ethics, which is a consequence of imperfect legislation.
In its conclusion, the article states that the problems that arise from the lack of accountability of legal acts of a real environmental situation occur in the member states, taking into account the special case of the European Union.
References
Kalynychenko, P.A. (2001). Sovremennye tendencii v razvitii ekologicheskogo prava ES. Materialy seminara «Prepodavaniye prava Evropeyskogo Soyuza v rossiyskikh VUZakh», issue II, 207-211. URL: https://eulaw.edu.ru/publikatsii/stati-po-pravu-evropejskogo-soyuza/sovremennye-tendentsii-v-razvitii-ekologicheskogo-prava-es-p-a-kalinichenko/ [in Russian].
Glenn, J.C., Gordon, T.J., Perelet, R. (1998). Defining Environmental Security: Implications for the U.S. Army. URL: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA593191.pdf.
Zurlini, G., Müller, F. (2008). Environmental Security. Sven Erik Jørgensen and Brian D. Fath (Editor-in-Chief), Systems Ecology. Vol. [2] of Encyclopedia of Ecology, 5 vols. Oxford: Else, 1350–1356. URL: https://books.google.nl/books?id=6IQY8Uh1aA0C&pg=PA1351&dq#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Trombetta, M.J. (2008) Environmental security and climate change: analysing the discourse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, issue 4, 585–602. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09557570802452920?needAccess=true.
Myers, N. (2004). Environmental security: what's new and different?. URL: http://military-gospel.tygae.org.za/pdf/2002_PeaceUniv-MyersN-EnvSec-NewDifferent.pdf.
Brundtland Commission Report. Our Common Future. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. URL: https://www.are.admin.ch/are/en/home/media/publications/sustainable-development/brundtland-report.html.
About UN Environment Programme. UN Environment Programme. URL: https://www.unep.org/about-un-environment.
Movchan, Yu. Polityka YeS u sferi okhorony dovkillia. Ministerstvo yustytsii Ukrainy. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/m/str_2971 [in Ukrainian].
Matveeva, E.V. (2013). Ekologicheskaya politika Evrosoyuza. Zhurnal SOK. № 4. URL: https://www.c-o-k.ru/articles/ekologicheskaya-politika-evrosoyuza [in Russian].
Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union. (2012). EUR-Lex. Official Journal C 326. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012M%2FTXT.
The Sixth Environment Action Programme of the European Community 2002-2012. European Commission. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/action-programme/index.htm.
Bukovala, J. (2021). Ecological Policy of the European Union. ECOLOGICA, Vol. 28, 101, 16–21. URL: https://www.academia.edu/45671632/Ecological_Policy_of_the_European_Union.
A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. (2001). (Commission's proposal to the Gothenburg European Council). EUR-Lex. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52001DC0264.
Okruzhaiushchaia sreda Sostoianye y perspektyvy. (2020). European Environment Agency. URL: https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/2020/soer-2020-executive-summary-translations/okruzhaiushchaia-srieda-sostoianiie-i-pierspiektivy-2020/view [in Russian].
EU says one in eight deaths is linked to pollution. (2020). BBC. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54071380.
Orhusskaya konventsiya: Rukovodstvo po osuschestvleniyu. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2015). UN, Second issue. URL: https://unece.org/DAM/env/pp/Publications/2015/Aarhus_Convention_Implementation_Guide_R.pdf [in Russian].
Cenevska Ilina. (2015). The European Union and Environmental Democracy: The Aarhus Convention in EU Law. Justinianus Primus Law Review, vol. VI, 11. URL: https://www.academia.edu/18906549/The_European_Union_and_Environmental_Democracy_The_Aarhus_Convention_in_EU_Law.
Rizzo, A. (2021). In Search of Ecocide Under EU Law. The International Context and EU Law Perspectives. Freedom Security and Justice European Legal Studies. URL: https://www.academia.edu/61756467/In_Search_of_Ecocide_Under_EU_Law_The_International_Context_and_EU_Law_Perspectives.
Upravlenie kachestvom vozduha v stranah vostochnogo regiona eisp. (2013). MWH. EuropeAid project. URL: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj02Lb-0a70AhWWvIsKHSCMAncQFnoECAIQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fenv.teset.sumdu.edu.ua%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F12%2F141121-On-IP-Procedure-Ru.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2yukWpc5IQe_RfJVj7BAPI [in Russian].
Kremer, L., Vinter, G. (2007). Ekologicheskoe pravo Evropeyskogo soyuza. Izdatelskiy Dom “Gorodets”. URL: https://www.gerd-winter.jura.uni-bremen.de/umwr-eu-russ1.pdf [in Russian].
Sprinchan, S., Syichev, A.A. (2015). Ekologicheskaya etika kak forma integratsii estestvenno-nauchnogo i gumanitarnogo znaniya. ITS, 3 (80), 100–106. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekologicheskaya-etika-kak-forma-integratsii-estestvenno-nauchnogo-i-gumanitarnogo-znaniya [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Yevhenii Pankov, Olha Filipshykh, Дмитро Сергійович Бойчук
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.