Сriterion of creativity (originality) as a condition of protectability of subject matter of copyright

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.153.228802

Keywords:

object, results of creative activity, copyright, subject matter of copyright, a criterion of creativity (originality), conditions of protectability of subject matter of copyright

Abstract

In the article, the author considers the question of the criterion of creativity (originality) as a condition of protectability of subject matter of copyright. It is indicated that the current civil legislation does not provide an understanding of the creative activity (originality) of the work. At the same time, the case law is based on the principle that the creative component in subject matter of copyright is presumed. Nevertheless, the question of the creative nature of the work may arise in the event of a dispute. In addition, an understanding of the criterion of creativity is necessary during the examination process.

The criterion of creativity (originality) of the work is analyzed from the point of view of the subjective approach – through the prism of expression of the author's individuality, the reflection of his personality, and objective approach, which is based on the presence of objective novelty. The author concludes that today the majority in both scientific circles and actually in the judicial practice of disclosing the criterion of creativity is carried out through the subjective approach.

The signs are given in the presence of which we can assume that the work has a creative (original) nature. It is noted that in order to recognize a work as original, there is no need for the form of expression to be absolutely original, and to have any features of previously created works (for example, citations, etc.), but only a certain level of creative individuality of the author in the work is enough.

The question of determining the level of originality of the form of expression of the work is analyzed, namely, what should be the minimum component of originality in order to recognize the existence of a creative nature and extend to the work the regime of copyright protection. It is indicated that in each case, for different types of works, the assessment of the originality of the work is different and is determined for each work separately, taking into account its features.

The study of the criterion of creativity (originality) is carried out based on a thorough and comprehensive analysis of legislation, case law, and scientific opinion that has formed on this issue. Based on the analysis of the criterion of creativity (originality) as a condition of protectability of subject matter of copyright, conclusions are made.

Author Biography

Yuriy Khodyko, National Law University named after Yaroslav the Wise

PhD in Law, Assistant Professor, Associate Professor of Civil Law Department № 1

References

Kohanovs'ka, O.V. (2006). Teoretychni problemy informacijnyh vidnosyn u cyvil'nomu pravi. Kyi'v: Vydavnycho-poligrafichnyj centr "Kyi'vs'kyj universytet" [in Ukrainian].

Malinovs'ka, I.M. (2013). Ohorona prav na bazu danyh u cyvil'nomu pravi Ukrai'ny. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Jarkina, N.Je. (2008). Pravova ohorona baz danyh: rezhymy avtors'ko-pravovyj i «sui-generis». Problemy zakonnosti, issue 99, 81–90 [in Ukrainian].

Gavrilov, Je.P. (1984). Sovetskoe avtorskoe pravo. Osnovnye polozhenija. Tendencii razvitija. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Pro kuljturu: Zakon Ukrajiny vid 14.12.2010 r. No. 2778-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2778-17 [in Ukrainian].

Sergeeva, A.P. (Ed.). (2019). Grazhdanskoe pravo (Vols. 1–3; Vol. 3). Moscow: Prospekt [in Russian].

Antimonov, B.S., Flejshic, E.A. (1957). Avtorskoe pravo. Moscow: Jurid. lit. [in Russian].

Dozorcev, V.A. (1985). Avtorskie dela v sude. Moscow: VAAP-Inform [in Russian].

Pro zastosuvannja sudamy norm zakonodavstva u spravakh pro zakhyst avtorsjkogho prava i sumizhnykh prav: Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnogho Sudu Ukrajiny vid 04.06.2010 r. No. 5. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0005700-10 [in Ukrainian].

Pilenko, A.A. (2001). Pravo izobretatelja. Moscow: Statut [in Russian].

Kashanin, A.V. (2010). Razvitie uchenija o forme i soderzhanii proizvedenija v doktrine avtorskogo prava. Problema ohranosposobnosti soderzhanija nauchnyh proizvedenij. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, 2, 68–138 [in Russian].

Pro avtorsjke pravo i sumizhni prava: Zakon Ukrajiny vid 23.12.1993 r. No. 3792-XII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3792-12 [in Ukrainian].

Direktiva Soveta Evropejskogo soobshhestva o pravovoj ohrane komp'juternyh programm ot 14 maja 1991 g. No. 91/250/EЭS. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_065 [in Russian].

Sag, M. (2019). Extended readings on copyright. URL: http://uilis.unsyiah.ac.id/oer/files/original/c920d07201b420045ee26bc7c631a827.pdf.

Rahmatulina, R.Sh. (2020). Konceptual'nye osnovy postroenija sistemy obektov avtorskogo prava. Doctor’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].

Majdanyk, L. (2018). Ponjattja oryghinaljnosti tvoru v avtorsjkomu pravi: dosvid JeS, Ukrajiny ta inshykh zarubizhnykh krajin. Pidpryjemnyctvo, ghospodarstvo i pravo, 10, 32–36 [in Ukrainian].

Case C-145/10, Painer, Judgment of the court, Dec. 01 2011, EU:C:2011:798, par. 94. URL: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=115785&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3473170.

Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v. Dirk Renckhoff : Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 Aug. 2018 in Case C161/17 (ECLI:EU:C:2018:634). URL: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=204738&doclang=EN (Last accessed: 01.04.2020).

Cofemel-Sociedade de Vestuário SA v. G-Star Raw CV : Judgment of the Сourt (Third Chamber) of 12 Sept. 2019 in Case C683/17 (EU:C:2019:721), par. 30. URL: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=351F81C9EBB4B0DFB8DFF102593F27B3?text=&docid=217668&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3470839 (Last accessed: 01.04.2020).

Rishennja Ghospodarsjkogho sudu Kharkivsjkoji oblasti vid 14 serpnja 2017 r. sprava No. 922/1900/17. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/68311267 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Vyshhogho ghospodarsjkogho sudu Ukrajiny vid 22 travnja 2012 r. sprava No. 5023/9426/11. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/24303321 [in Ukrainian].

Mel'nikov, V. (2004). Knigi o Garri Pottere – predmet sudebnyh razbiratel'stv v Niderlandah i Velikobritanii. Intellektual'naja sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava, 10, 41–47 [in Russian].

Case No. 89-1909, Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Company, Jan. 9 1991, (499 U.S. 340). URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/499/340/.

Postanova Vyshhogho ghospodarsjkogho sudu Ukrainy vid 1 lypnja 2008 r. sprava No. 39/418 pd. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/1802529 [in Ukrainian].

Pro osvitu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 05.09.2017 r. No. 2145-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text [in Ukrainian].

Rekomendacii' shhodo zapobigannja akademichnomu plagiatu ta jogo vyjavlennja v naukovyh robotah (avtoreferatah, dysertacijah, monografijah, naukovyh dopovidjah, stattjah toshho): Lyst Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrainy vid 15.08.2018 r. No. 1/11-8681. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v8681729-18#Text [in Ukrainian].

Polozhennja pro zakhody shhodo zapobighannja akademichnomu plaghiatu: Nakaz DVNZ Universytet bankivsjkoji spravy vid 16.10.2020 r. No. 148-od. Universytet Bankivsjkoji spravy. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lgNdmF_6quFXR6V2jof2rgKT1jzIbAXX/view [in Ukrainian].

Porjadok perevirky akademichnykh ta naukovykh tekstiv na plaghiat Nacionaljnogho aviacijnogho universytetu: Nakaz Nacionaljnogho aviacijnogho universytetu vid 13.12.2018 r. No. 605. URL: https://nau.edu.ua/site/variables/news/2018/12/poriadok.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Polozhennja pro porjadok perevirky akademichnykh ta naukovykh tekstiv na unikaljnistj v Sumsjkomu nacionaljnomu aghrarnomu universyteti: Nakaz Sumsjkogho NAU vid 16.10.2019 r. No. 339-k. URL: https://snau.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/%D0%9F%D0%9E%D0%9B%D0%9E%D0%96%D0%95%D0%9D%D0%9D%D0%AF_%D0%A3%D0%9D%D0%86%D0%9A%D0%90%D0%9B%D0%AC%D0%9D%D0%86%D0%A1%D0%A2%D0%AC_%D0%A1%D0%9D%D0%90%D0%A3.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Kashanin, A.V. (2010). Minimal'nyj uroven' tvorcheskogo haraktera proizvedenij v avtorskom prave Francii. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki, 1, 114–124 [in Russian].

Published

2021-06-16

How to Cite

Khodyko, Y. (2021). Сriterion of creativity (originality) as a condition of protectability of subject matter of copyright. Problems of Legality, (153), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.153.228802

Issue

Section

CIVIL LAW AND CIVIL PROCEDURE