Cultural approach in the legal myth studying

Authors

  • Юлія Валеріївна Тіщенко Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
  • Лариса Степанівна Бєлік Національний університет «Одеська юридична академія»,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.151.215653

Keywords:

myth, universals of culture, legal myth, properties of legal myth, culturological approach, anthropological approach, hermeneutic approach, semiotic approach

Abstract

The article is devoted to substantiating the importance of the culturological approach to clarify the socio-cultural features of the legal myth in terms of categories of culturology.

It is noted that myths were created and passed down from generation to generation throughout its existence and development.  This gives reason to say that the myth is a fundamental form of understanding and constructing reality.

The characteristic mythologems of different epochs are traced, which are defined as stable mythopoetic universals, which pass from society to society, from one time to another.  It is argued that the mythologies of peoples and epochs concentrate the general, collective ideas of people about how "it should be", contain certain stereotypes that can influence the ideology, thinking and behavior of people of a certain social culture.  It is concluded that such mythologisms are introduced and live in the depths of human consciousness, and, more precisely, the subconscious.  It is proved that collective ideas that characterize the specifics of the national spirit, national character, mentality, must be "experienced" by representatives of a particular era to become a myth.

The general characteristics of the legal myth are analyzed, such as dogmatism, sociality, out-temporality, regularity, irrationality, energy, ambiguity, antinomy, cyclicity.

Specific features of the legal myth are distinguished: the legal myth operates with legal concepts or their metaphorical analogues and aims to increase the authority of law by differentiating it from other social systems, and is potentially formally and normatively provided.

It is substantiated that the culturological approach to the study of the essence of the legal myth includes three aspects: anthropological, hermeneutic and semiotic.  The anthropological approach allows us to identify the personal dimension of the legal myth.  The hermeneutics of the myth gives rise to the idea of it as a certain carrier of cultural identity.  In the semiotic aspect, the legal myth is considered as an element of the sign-symbolic system to which culture belongs.

It is argued that understanding the phenomenological nature of legal myth and its cultural archaic roots makes it possible to comprehensively understand the essence of this phenomenon, identify the place of legal myth in modern legal reality and understand its impact on lawmaking and law enforcement.

Author Biographies

Юлія Валеріївна Тіщенко, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

кандидат юридичних наук,

доцент кафедри загальнотеоретичної юриспруденції

Лариса Степанівна Бєлік, Національний університет «Одеська юридична академія»

кандидат юридичних наук,

доцент кафедри криміналістики

 

 

References

Andreev, Yu.V. (1990). Poeziya mifa i proza istorii. Lenizdat [in Russian].

Apinyan, T.A. (2004). Toska po mifu ili mif kak sobytie sovremennosti. Filosofskie nauki, 11, 73–83 [in Russian].

Golosovker, Ya.E. (2010). Izbrannoe. Logika mifa. St. Petersburg: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ [in Russian].

Gryazin, I.N. (2011). Pravo est mif. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie, 5, 72–95 [in Russian].

Gurevich, A.Ya. (1984). Kategorii srednevekovoj kultury. Moscow : Iskusstvo [in Russian].

Dovina, M.S. (2013). Teoriya mifu u suchasnij gumanitaristici. Literatura ta kultura Polissya, issue 9 (72), 53–66 [in Ukrainian].

Dudchenko, V.V. (2009). Pro germenevtichnij pidhid do prava. Aktualni problemi derzhavi i prava, issue 45, 11–16 [in Ukrainian].

Kulturologiya: XX vek: slovar. (1997). St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga [in Russian].

Mann, T. (2010). Iosif i ego bratya / per. Solomon. Moscow : AST [in Russian].

Oborotov, Y. (2010). Pravorozuminnya yak aksiomatichne nachalo (postulat) prava. Pravo Ukrayini, 4, 49–55 [in Ukrainian].

Ovchinnikova, A.P. (2015). O kul'turologicheskom podhode k pravu. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu: Seriia: Pravo. Issue 30. Vol. 2, 197–200. Uzhhorod: Vydavnychyi dim «Helvetyka» [in Russian].

Polyakov, A.V. (2003). Obshaya teoriya prava. Fenomenologo-kommunikativnyj podhod. St. Petersburg: Yuridicheskij centr Press [in Russian].

Ponamorenko, V.E. (2002). Problemy ponimaniya i socialno-psihologicheskogo obosnovaniya demokraticheskogo gosudarstvennogo rezhima: v svete psihologii mass i psihologii narodov. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Stavropol [in Russian].

Reale, Dzh., Antiseri, D. (1997). Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashih dnej. Vol. 4: Novoe vremya. St. Petersburg: TOO TK Petropolis [in Russian].

Published

2020-12-08

How to Cite

Тіщенко, Ю. В., & Бєлік, Л. С. (2020). Cultural approach in the legal myth studying. Problems of Legality, (151), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.151.215653

Issue

Section

PHILOSOPHY OF LAW