Problematic issues of consideration by the investigating judge of complaints against decisions, actions or inaction of the coroner, investigator or prosecutor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.151.215343Keywords:
investigating judge, complaint, complainant, decisions, actions or omissions of the investigator, prosecutor or coroner, competence of the investigating judgeAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of the problems of normative provision and the practice of exercising the powers of the investigating judge when considering complaints against decisions, actions or inaction of the pre-trial investigation bodies or the prosecutor. It is noted that a clear normative regulation is required: the issue of participation in the court hearing of the person who filed a complaint against the decision, action or inaction of the investigator, prosecutor, coroner; the legal consequences of the applicant's failure to appear in court; requirements for the form and content of the complaint against the decision, action or omission of the investigator, investigator or prosecutor, which is closely related to the correct definition of the person who is legally subject to appeal, as well as the subject of appeal and the complainant; legal consequences of non-compliance with the requirements for the form and content of the complaint.
In the absence at this time of direct regulation of the procedure for consideration of complaints in court, the case law began to take shape in terms of compliance with the requirements set out in Part 3 of Art. 306 of the CPC, which indicates the need for mandatory participation of the complainant in the court hearing. The author examines the options for procedural decisions that an investigating judge may make in the event of a complainant's absence and how appropriate and justified in the paradigm of modern criminal proceedings is the absolute prohibition of an investigating judge to consider a complaint without the complainant's participation.
It is noted that judicial control during the consideration of complaints against decisions, actions or omissions of the coroner, investigator or prosecutor is the most effective means of protecting the rights, freedoms and interests of participants in criminal proceedings during the pre-trial investigation.
References
Nor, V.T., Kryklyvets, D.Ye. (2017). Realizatsiia zasady zmahalnosti pid chas rozghliadu skarh slidchym suddeiu. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo TzOV «Kolir PRO» [in Ukrainian].
Kovtun, N.N. (2002). Sudebnyj kontrol' v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii (ponjatie, sushhnost', formy). Doctor’s thesis. Nizhnij Novgorod [in Russian].
Fojnickij, I.Ja. (1912). Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Tipografija t-va «Obshhestvennaja Pol'za» [in Russian].
Viktorskij, S.I. (1912). Russkij ugolovnyj process. Moscow: Izd. A. A. Karceva [in Russian].
Poznyshev, S.V. (1913). Jelementarnyj uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo processa. Moscow: G.A. Leman [in Russian].
Rozin, N.N. (1914). Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. St. Petersburg: Izd. jurid. knizh. sklada «Pravo» [in Russian].
Perlov, I.D. (1959). Zakonnost' i pravosudie. Moscow: Znanie [in Russian].
Mitrohin, N.P. (1979). Zakonnost' i demokratizm predvaritel'nogo sledstvija. Minsk: Vysh. shkola [in Russian].
Kogan, V. (1988). Pochemu by ne byt' sledstvennomu sud'e? Sovetskaja justicija, 7, 26–27 [in Russian].
Tumanjanc, A.R. (1998). Sudebnyj kontrol' za zakonnost'ju i obosnovannost'ju processual'nyh reshenij organov dosudebnogo sledstvija. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkіv [in Russian].
Tumaniants, A.R. (2000). Kontrolni funktsii sudu u sferi kryminalnoho sudochynstva. Kharkiv: Osnova [in Ukrainian].
Shylo, O.H. (2011). Teoretychni osnovy ta praktyka realizatsii konstytutsiinoho prava liudyny i hromadianyna na sudovyi zakhyst u dosudovomu provadzhenni v kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy. Doctor’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Shylo, O.H. (2011). Teoretychni osnovy ta praktyka realizatsii konstytutsiinoho prava liudyny i hromadianyna na sudovyi zakhyst u dosudovomu provadzhenni v kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Ilieva, T.H. (2014). Funktsiia sudovoho kontroliu u kryminalnomu protsesi. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Hloviuk, I.V. (2010). Sudova diialnist u dosudovykh stadiiakh kryminalnoho protsesu. Odesa: Feniks [in Ukrainian].
Hloviuk, I.V. (2015). Kryminalno-protsesualni funktsii: teoriia, metodolohiia ta praktyka realizatsii na osnovi polozhen Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy 2012 r. Odesa: Yurydychna literatura [in Ukrainian].
Makarov, M.A. (2018). Sudovyi kontrol u kryminalnomu protsesi: teoretychni ta pravovi osnovy. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Makarov, M.A. (2018). Sudovyi kontrol u kryminalnomu protsesi: teoretychni ta pravovi osnovy. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Trakalo, R.I. (2014). Sudovyi kontrol za dotrymanniam prava na povahu do pryvatnoho zhyttia. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Poliukhovych, O.I. (2017). Sudovyi kontrol pry provedenni nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Poliukhovych, O.I. (2017). Sudovyi kontrol pry provedenni nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Kolesnik, H.R. (2018). Funktsionalne pryznachennia nahliadu i kontroliu u dosudovomu rozsliduvanni. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Stepanov, A.B. (2018). Spivvidnoshennia prokurorskoho nahliadu, vidomchoho ta sudovoho kontroliu pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Bryntsev, V.D. (1997). Dosudove slidstvo: sudovyi slidchyi chy «sledstvennыi sudia»? Pravo Ukrainy, 7, 7–9 [in Ukrainian].
Hroshevyi, Yu. (2003). Problemy udoskonalennia zakonodavstva, shcho rehuliuie kryminalno-protsesualnu diialnist Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 2–3, 690–700 [in Ukrainian].
Maliarenko, V.T. (2005). Perebudova kryminalnoho protsesu Ukrainy v konteksti yevropeiskykh standartiv: teoriia, istoriia i praktyka. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Kostiuchenko, O.Yu. (2005). Apeliatsiine oskarzhennia sudovykh rishen u kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Skrypina, Yu.V. (2008). Slidchyi suddia v systemi kryminalno-protsesualnoi diialnosti (porivnialno-pravove doslidzhennia). Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Skrypina, Yu.V. (2008). Slidchyi suddia v systemi kryminalno-protsesualnoi diialnosti (porivnialno-pravove doslidzhennia). Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Tumaniants, A.R. (2011). Slidchyi suddia yak sub’iekt realizatsii sudovykh funktsii u dosudovomu provadzhenni. Forum prava, 2, 896–901. URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/FP/2011-2/11tarudp.pdf (дата звернення: 04.06.2019).
Shylo, O.H. (2013). Slidchyi suddia v kryminalnomu provadzhenni: funktsionalne pryznachennia ta kryminalna protsesualna kompetentsiia. Pravova doktryna Ukrainy. (Vols. 1–5); Vol. 5: Kryminalno-pravovi nauky v Ukraini: stan, problemy ta shliakhy rozvytku. Nats. akad. prav. nauk Ukrainy. V. Ya. Tatsii (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Shylo, O.H. (2018). Kompetentsiia slidchoho suddi v kryminalnomu provadzhenni: teoriia, normatyvna model i tendentsii rozvytku zakonodavstva. Pravo Ukrainy, 3, 79–91 [in Ukrainian].
Bondiuk, A.F. (2017). Protsesualni osnovy statusu slidchoho suddi u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Bondiuk, A.F. (2017). Protsesualni osnovy statusu slidchoho suddi u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv. URL: http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1760/1/aref_Bonduk.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Світлана Леонідівна Шаренко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
