Ecosystem as an object of environmental law through the prism of the ecosystem approach implementation

Authors

  • Євгеній Павлович Суєтнов Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.150.210381

Keywords:

environmental law, environmental legislation, objects of environmental law, ecosystem, ecosystem approach

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the ecosystem as an object of environmental law through the prism of the ecosystem approach – the newest strategy aimed at shifting the emphasis from the management of individual natural objects to the management of ecosystems that are of direct importance to humanity. The doctrinal views on the ecosystem as an object of environmental law and its place among other objects of legal regulation are analyzed. The opinion is substantiated that the implementation of the ecosystem approach into environmental law provides for the transformation of this branch of law at the level of the object composition and the recognition of the ecosystem as its central object. It has been suggested that with a change in the structural organization of environmental law, when the ecosystem will be recognized as its central object, and all other objects will be considered in the ecosystem context, the ecosystem concept will have the status of the main paradigm of environmental law and, probably, subsequently, being quite «ecosystemocentric», environmental law will be transformed into «ecosystem law», just as environmental legislation will finally be based on a single scientific concept – the concept of an ecosystem, which significantly activates the process of codification of environmental legislation in the form of developing an «Ecosystem Code». Such position is certainly debatable and can be critically perceived in scientific circles, and therefore requires a comprehensive development and justification. At the same time, the very formulation of the question of the place of the ecosystem among the objects of environmental law can start a lively and fruitful scientific discussion that will help to develop an optimal model of legal regulation of environmental relations.

Author Biography

Євгеній Павлович Суєтнов, Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

доцент кафедри екологічного права

References

Nosik, V.V. (2019). Problemy pravovoho zabezpechennia realizatsii tsilei staloho rozvytku u sferi zberezhennia, vidnovlennia ta ratsionalnoho vykorystannia ekosystem v Ukraini. Osoblyvosti pravovoho rehuliuvannia ekolohichnykh, zemelnykh, ahrarnykh, pryrodoresursnykh vidnosyn v umovakh hlobalizatsii : zb. materialiv Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (Ivano-Frankivsk – Yaremche, 20–22 veresnia 2019 r.) – Features of legal regulation of ecological, land, agrarian, natural resource relations in the conditions of globalization: Proceedings of the Conference Title, Ivano-Frankivsk, 23–26 [in Ukrainian].

Tansley, A.G. (1935). The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology, vol. 16, 3, 284–307.

Tansley, A.G. (1939). The British Islands and Their Vegetation. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. pp. XXXVIII, 930, with 162 plates containing 418 photographs, and 179 figures in the text.

Sukachev, V.N. (1972). Izbrannye trudy. Osnovy lesnoj tipologii i biogeocenologii. (Vols. 1–3); Vol. 1. Leningrad: Nauka [in Russian].

Debelaja, I.D. (2012). Racional’noe prirodopol’zovanie. Habarovsk: Izd-vo Tihookean. gos. un-ta [in Russian].

Lindeman, R.L. (1942). The Trophic-Dynamic Aspect of Ecology. Ecology, vol. 23, 4, 399–417.

Evans, F.C. (1956). Ecosystem as the Basic Unit in Ecology. Science. vol. 123, issue 3208, 1127–1128.

Stoddart, D.R. (1965). Geography and the Ecological Approach: The Ecosystem as a Geographic Principle and Method. Geography, vol. 50, 3, 242–251.

Odum, E.P. (1953). Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.

Odum, Ju. (1986). Jekologija. (Vols. 1–2; Vol. 1). Moscow: Mir [in Russian].

Odum, E.P. (1964). The New Ecology. BioScience, vol. 14, 7, 14–16.

Van Dyne, G.M. (1966). Ecosystems, systems ecology, and systems ecologists. ORNL-3957. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1–40.

Odum, Ju. (1975). Osnovy jekologii. Moscow: Mir [in Russian].

Danilov-Danil’jan, V.I., Losev, K.S., Rejf, I.E. (2005). Pered glavnym vyzovom civilizacii: Vzgljad iz Rossii. Moscow: INFRA-M. URL: http://lit.lib.ru/r/rejf_i_e/peredglawnymwyzowomciwilizacii.shtml [in Russian].

Jekosistemy i blagosostojanie cheloveka. Sintez». Doklad mezhdunarodnoj programmy «Ocenka ekosistem na poroge tysjacheletija. (2005). URL: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.791.aspx.pdf.

Konventsiia pro okhoronu biolohichnoho riznomanittia vid 05.06.1992 r. Data onovlennia: 29.10.2010. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030.

Doklad pervogo soveshhanija Konferencii Storon Konvencii o biologicheskom raznoobrazii (Nassau, 28.11–09.12.1994; UNEP/CBD/COP/1/17, 28.02.1995). URL: https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-01/official/cop-01-17-ru.pdf [in Russian].

Doklad vtorogo soveshhanija Konferencii Storon Konvencii o biologicheskom raznoobrazii (Dzhakarta, 06–17.11.1995; UNEP/CBD/COP/2/19, 30.11.1995). URL: https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-02/official/cop-02-19-ru.pdf [in Russian].

Doklad o rabote pjatogo soveshhanija Konferencii Storon Konvencii o biologicheskom raznoobrazii (Najrobi, 15–26.05.2000; UNEP/CBD/COP/5/23, 22.06.2000). URL: https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-05/official/cop-05-23-ru.pdf [in Russian].

Pro Osnovni zasady (stratehiiu) derzhavnoi ekolohichnoi polityky Ukrainy na period do 2030 roku: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.02.2019 r. № 2697-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2697-19.

Pro okhoronu navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha: Zakon Ukrainy vid 25.06.1991 r. № 1264-XII. Data onovlennia: 07.06.2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1264-12.

Ob ohrane okruzhajushhej sredy: Federal’nyj zakon ot 10.01.2002 g. № 7-FZ. URL: https://zakonbase.ru/zakony/ob-ohrane-sredi/.

Ob ohrane okruzhajushhej sredy: Zakon Respubliki Belarus’ ot 26.11.1992 g. № 1982-XІІ. URL: https://pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0=v19201982.

Pro zatverdzhennia Zahalnoderzhavnoi prohramy okhorony ta vidtvorennia dovkillia Azovskoho i Chornoho moriv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 22.03.2001 r. № 2333-III. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2333-14.

Andreitsev, V.I. (1996). Ekolohichne pravo. Kyiv: Venturi [in Ukrainian].

Sharapova, S.V. (2018). Deiaki pytannia okhorony ta zberezhennia ekolohichnykh system. Problemy zakonnosti – Problems of Legality, issue 142, 149–157 [in Ukrainian].

Dubovik, O.L., Kremer, L., Ljubbe-Vol’ff, G. (2005). Jekologicheskoe pravo. O.L. Dubovik (Ed.). Moskva: «Jeksmo» [in Russian].

Getman, A.P., Shulha, M.V. (Eds.). (2009). Ekolohichne pravo Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Getman, A.P. (Ed.). (2013). Ekolohichne pravo. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Getman, A.P., Anisimova, A.V., Sokolova, A.K. et al. (2019). Ekolohichne pravo. A.P. Getman (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Karakash, I.I. (Ed.). (2012). Ekolohichne pravo Ukrainy. Odesa: Feniks [in Ukrainian].

Shemshuchenko, Yu.S. (Ed.). (2008). Ekolohichne pravo Ukrainy. Akademichnyi kurs. Kyiv: TOV «Vydavnytstvo «Iurydychna dumka» [in Ukrainian].

Erofeev, B.V. (1996). Jekologicheskoe pravo Rossii. Moscow: «Jurist» [in Russian].

Brinchuk, M.M. (2009). Koncepcii razvitija jekologicheskogo zakonodatel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii. Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo Juridicheskogo institute [in Russian].

Brinchuk, M.M. Jekosistemnyj podhod v prave. URL: https://wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/34637-ehkosistemnyj-podkhod-prave [in Russian].

Brinchuk, M.M. (2012). Estestvennye jekologicheskie sistemy i jekologicheskoe pravo. Chast’ 1. Astrahanskij vestnik jekologicheskogo obrazovanija – Astrakhan bulletin of environmental education, 2 (20), 4–14 [in Russian].

Brinchuk, M.M. (2012). Estestvennye jekologicheskie sistemy i jekologicheskoe pravo. Part 2. Astrahanskij vestnik jekologicheskogo obrazovanija – Astrakhan bulletin of environmental education, 3 (21), 4–17 [in Russian].

Brinchuk, M.M. (2013). Principy jekologicheskogo prava. Moscow: Jurlitinform [in Russian].

Krasnova, I.O. Differenciacija i integracija v jekologicheskom prave: na puti k sblizheniju. URL: http://отрасли-права.рф/article/19298 [in Russian].

Krasnova, M.V. (2014). Intehratsiinyi ta dyferentsiini pidkhody v teorii ekolohichnoho prava: problemy metodolohii nauky. Problemy intehratsii ta dyferentsiatsii v ekolohichnomu pravi : mater. Vseukrainskoho nauk.-prakt. kruhloho stolu (Dnipropetrovsk, 25 veresnia 2014 r.) – Problems of integration and differentiation in environmental law: Proceedings of roundtable discussion. Dnipropetrovsk, 75–86 [in Ukrainian].

Cherkashyna, M. (2020). Concept and features of an aquatic ecosystem as an object of ecological legal relations. Legea si Viata. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341178737 [in Russian].

Krasnova, M. (2013). Stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku vchennia pro ob’iekty ekolohichnoho prava: naukovo-metodolohichni aspekty. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Seriia: Yurydychni nauky – Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Series: Law, issue 2 (96), 8–12 [in Ukrainian].

Muravska, M.L. (2013). Poniattia shtuchnoho vodnoho ob’iekta yak ob’iekta pravovykh vidnosyn. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava – Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, 2, 277–281 [in Ukrainian].

Smoliarchuk, R.F. (2018). Pravove poniattia lisu yak ob’iekta okhorony y vykorystannia v yurydychnii doktryni ta zakonodavstvi. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo – Comparative analytical law, 4, 219–223 [in Ukrainian].

Chopyk, O. (2010). Poniattia lisu yak ob’iekta pravovoho rehuliuvannia. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia yurydychna – Bulletin of the University of Lviv. Legal series, issue 50, 224–229 [in Ukrainian].

Horodetska, I.A. (2014). Do rozuminnia ta vyznachennia poniattia «tvarynnyi svit». Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Yurysprudentsiia – Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanities University. Series: Jurisprudence, 9-2, vol. 2, 40–42 [in Ukrainian].

Suietnov, Ye.P. (2020). «Ekosystemizatsiia» ob’iektiv ekolohichnoho prava v konteksti vprovadzhennia ta realizatsii ekosystemnoho pidkhodu. Problemy zakonnosti – Problems of Legality, issue 148, 132–151 [in Ukrainian].

Perelet, R.A. (2006). Jekosistemnyj podhod k upravleniju prirodopol’zovaniem i prirodoohrannoj dejatel’nost’ju. Mehanizm reguljuvannja ekonomiki – Mechanism of Economic Regulation, 1, 36–53 [in Russian].

Anisimova, A.V. (2019). Teoretychni zasady rozvytku ekolohichnoho zakonodavstva v konteksti pryrodno-pravovoi doktryny. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Getman, A.P., Zuiev, V.A. (2016). Formuvannia ekoloho-pravovoi nauky: resursnyi aspekt ta problemy yoho intehratsii. Problemy zakonnosti – Problems of Legality, issue 132, 104–123 [in Ukrainian].

Anisimova, A.V. (2014). Ob’iekty ekolohichnykh pravovidnosyn: suchasni pidkhody. Teoriia i praktyka pravoznavstva – Theory and practice of jurisprudence, issue 1 (5), 1–17 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2020-09-29

How to Cite

Суєтнов, Є. П. (2020). Ecosystem as an object of environmental law through the prism of the ecosystem approach implementation. Problems of Legality, (150), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.150.210381

Issue

Section

ECONOMIC LAW AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW