Powers of the investigator, prosecutor and employee of the operational unit to involve other persons in confidential cooperation in criminal proceedings

Authors

  • Яна Тализіна Prosecutor’s Office of Kyiv,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.150.207822

Keywords:

covert investigative (search) actions, use of confidential cooperation, confidant status, powers of the investigator, prosecutor, employee of the operational unit, written consent, resolution of the investigator, judicial practice

Abstract

The different views of scholars and practitioners on the procedure for involving other persons in confidential cooperation in criminal proceedings are analyzed in the article. By analyzing the case law, at least three approaches to the moment of acquiring the status of a confidant by a person who has consented to participate in covert investigative (search) actions are identified. Our own vision of the procedural order for involving persons in confidential cooperation is proposed, taking into account the powers of the investigator and the prosecutor to make the relevant procedural decision. The procedural impossibility of employees of operational unit to independently involve other persons in confidential cooperation is substantiated. Arguments are made in favor of the fact that formally the prosecutor in criminal proceedings has the right to involve persons in confidential cooperation, regardless of the investigator. 

The purpose of this research is to formulate proposals to improve the legislation governing the use of confidential cooperation in criminal proceedings, so that due to legal uncertainty the prosecution does not lose important evidence of involvement in a criminal offense and the perpetrators do not avoid responsibility due to the imperfection of procedural and legal constructions. To achieve this purpose, in the course of the research the author identified and analyzed the causes of uncertainty in the order of involvement of a person in confidential cooperation. Different approaches of scholars and practitioners to the meaning of the term “other persons”, which may be involved in covert investigative (search) actions and confidential cooperation, which the author considers an independent covert investigative (search) action, are studied.  

The procedural expediency of including the prosecutor in the construction of Article 275 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine is substantiated to normatively consolidate the powers of the prosecutor to use confidential cooperation, equivalent to the powers of the investigator, and to stop discussions on this issue, which will promote uniform law enforcement practice and bring perpetrators to justice.  

Author Biography

Яна Тализіна, Prosecutor’s Office of Kyiv

Postgraduate Student of the Academician Stashis Scientific Research Institute for the Study of Crime Problems of the National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine

References

Pro prokuraturu: Zakon Ukrajiny vid 14.10.2014 r. No. 1697-VII [About prosecutor's office. Law of Ukraine dated October 14, 2014 No. 1697-VII]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1697-18 [in Ukrainian].

Leonov, A.A. (2019). Osoblyvosti provedennja neghlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dij pid chas dosudovogho rozsliduvannja kryminaljnykh provadzhenj [Peculiarities of conducting covert investigative (search) actions during the pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings]. Zakon i biznes – Law & business. URL: https://zib.com.ua/ua/print/136530-osoblivosti_provedennya_nsrd_v_kriminalnomu_provadzhenni.html [in Ukrainian].

Talyzina, Ya.O. (2020). Problemni pytannja zaluchennja osoby do konfidencijnogho spivrobitnyctva ta zabezpechennja jiji bezpeky jak uchasnyka kryminaljnogho provadzhennja [Problematic issues of involving a person in confidential cooperation and ensuring their security as a participant in criminal proceedings]. Pytannja borotjby zi zlochynnistju – Issues of crime prevention, 39, 121–127 [in Ukrainian].

Kryminaljnyj procesualjnyj kodeks Ukrajiny: Zakon Ukrajiny vid 13.04.2012 r. No. 4651-VI [Criminal procedure code of Ukraine dated April 13, 2012 No. 4651-VI]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17 [in Ukrainian].

Leiba, O.A. (2018). Defekty kryminaljnogho procesualjnogho zakonodavstva ta zasoby jikh podolannja [Defects of criminal procedural legislation and ways to overcome them]. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Sokolov, O.V. (2019). Vykonannja operatyvnymy pidrozdilamy doruchenj slidchogho, prokurora pro provedennja neghlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dij [Execution of operational units of the orders issued by the investigator, prosecutor on performance of covert investigative (search) actions]. Kharkiv: Oberigh [in Ukrainian].

Vyrok Slov'jansjkogho misjkrajonnogho sudu Donecjkoji oblasti vid 01.11.2019 r., sprava No. 243/6086/18 [The verdict of the Slovianskyi city district court of Donetsk region dated November 01, 2019, case No. 243/6086/18]. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85338600 [in Ukrainian].

Vyrok Zhovtnevogho rajonnogho sudu m. Zaporizhzhja vid 01.11.2019 r., sprava No. 335/14877/17 [The verdict of the Zhovtnevyi district court of Zaporizhzhia dated November 01, 2019, case No. 335/14877/17]. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85339262 [in Ukrainian].

Sokolov, O.V. (2017). [Involvement by the operational unit persons to performing secret investigative (search) actions]. Aktualjni problemy vitchyznjanoji jurysprudenciji – Actual problems of native jurisprudence, 6 (1), 133–139 [in Ukrainian].

Vyrok Kalusjkogho misjkrajonnogho sudu Ivano-Frankivsjkoji oblasti vid 16.03.2020 r., sprava No. 345/658/19 [The verdict of the Kalusjkyj city district court of Ivano-Frankivsjk region dated March 16, 2020, case No. 345/658/19]. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88214377 [in Ukrainian].

Vyrok Zhovtnevogho rajonnogho sudu m. Zaporizhzhja vid 24.12.2019 r., sprava No. 331/6174/16-k [The verdict of the Zhovtnevyi district court of Zaporizhzhia dated December 24, 2019, case No. 331/6174/16-к]. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86604469 [in Ukrainian].

Vyrok Bilopiljsjkogho rajonnogho sudu Sumsjkoji oblasti vid 11.11.2019 r., sprava No. 573/190/19 [The verdict of the Bilopilskyi district court of Sumy region dated November 11, 2019, case No. 573/190/19]. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85501122 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2020-09-29

How to Cite

Тализіна, Я. (2020). Powers of the investigator, prosecutor and employee of the operational unit to involve other persons in confidential cooperation in criminal proceedings. Problems of Legality, (150), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.150.207822

Issue

Section

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND СRIMINALISTICS