On copyright trolling in the framework of civil law





copyright trolling, author’s economic rights, declaration of intent, contract, delict, personal interests


The paper analyses copyright trolling in the scope of illegitimate compensation claims for a breach of the author’s economic rights, i.e. where: 1) no infringement of economic rights has occurred, or 2) the action has been brought before the wrong authorities, or 3) the claimant has no title to bring the action before the court. It was noted that the use of copyrighted works requires the consent of the owner of economic rights, or such a use as an exception is possible in the form of permissible use. If a work is used under a contract or the law, no infringement occurs. It outlines cases of a breach of the author’s economic rights in the Polish law and the protection measures available to the entitled party in the event of an infringement. In particular, according to Art. 79 of the Copyright Law, the injured party may generally demand that the person who infringed upon the economic rights (the offender): 1) ceases the infringement; 2) removes the effects of the infringement 3) redresses the damage: under general conditions or by paying double the amount due if the owner had consented to the use; 4) renders the obtained benefits. A copyright troll calls the recipient to redress the damage by paying an appropriate sum, which is the owner’s right in the event of an infringement. Copyright troll falsely relying on the fact of infringement, while acts to obtain undue benefits. 

Furthermore, it discusses the term of “copyright trolling” and its scope. A significant conclusion is that copyright trolling is an action of exploiting copyright infringement and the related protection measures to obtain material gain (extort money). The paper offers an assessment of the phenomenon in the framework of civil law, focusing primarily on the legal basis for the return of the performance / redressing the damage. The basis for the return is provided by regulations on unjust enrichment. It is observed that the circumstances of copyright trolling allow for claiming infringement upon personal interests, such as privacy, peace, the right not to be disturbed, the inviolability of the home. This work aims to contribute to the growing body of literature on copyright trolling. The author especially hopes to initiate an informed discussion based on research, which could have the additional benefit of educating the public on the subject.


Act of April 23, 1964 The Civil Code (consolidated text, Journal of Laws of 2019, item. 1145, as amended).

Act of February 4, 1994 Law on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights (consolided text, Journal of Laws of 2019, item 1231, as amended).

Act of June, 6 1997, the Penal Code, Dz.U. 2019, item 1950.

Balganesh, S. (2013). The Uneasy Case Against Copyright Trolls. 86 Southern California law review, 723 (2013) available on http://ssrn.com/abstract=2150716.

Bednarek, M. (2006). System Prawa Prywatnego, Prawo zobowiązań – część ogólna, E. Łętowska (ed.), Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 2006.

Bieniek, E., Lewandowski, P. (2012). Freedom from being stalked as a personal right. The Milestones of Law in the area of Europe 2012, 2nd part, Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law, 2012.

Bogdalski, P. (2003). Środki ochrony autorskich praw majątkowych oraz ich dochodzenie w świetle prawa polskiego, Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2003.

Collins Hoffman, P.-Ch. (2015). Non-Commercial Online Copyright Infringement in Canada: The Challenge of Balancing the Copyright Owners' Interests Against Those of Internet Users, Internet and E-Commerce Law in Canada, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015.

Curran, L.S. (2013). Copyright Trolls, Defining the Line Between Legal Ransom Letters and Defending Digital Rights: Turning Piracy into a Business Model or Protecting Creative from Internet Lawlessness? 13 The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law 170, 2013.

Gawlik, Z. (2014). Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz. Tom III. Zobowiązania – część szczególna, A. Kidyba (ed.), available on lex database 2014.

Gordley, J. (2004). Mistake in Contract Formation. American Journal of Comparative Law 52, no. 2, 2004.

Greenberg, B.A. (2014). Copyright trolls and presumptively fair uses. University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 85, 2014.

Grzybczyk, K. (2019). Ikony popkultury a prawo własności intelektualnej. Jak znani i sławni chronią swoje prawa, Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2019.

Jankowska, M. (2011). Autorstwo i prawo do autorstwa, Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2011.

Jankowska, M. (2017). Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych. Komentarz, P. Ślęzak (ed.), Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 2017.

Jezioro, J. (2013). Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, E. Gniewek, P. Machnikowski (eds.), Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 2013.

Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska, B. (1971). Uwagi o konstrukcji wad oświadczenia woli w Kodeksie cywilnym. Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne no. 6, 1971.

Mi, J. (2007). Analysis on declaration of intent. Frontiers of Law in China 2, no. 3, 2007.

Nowicka, A. (2013). System Prawa Prywatnego, Prawo autorskie, vol. 13, J. Barta (ed.), Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 2013.

Podel, W. (2014). Windykacja. Dla wierzycieli, firm windykacyjnych i kancelarii prawnych. Skuteczne praktyki, Warsaw: Difin, 2014.

Preussner-Zamorska, J., Marcinkowska, J. (2013). System Prawa Prywatnego, Prawo autorskie, Vol. 13, J. Barta (ed.), Warsaw: C.H.Beck, 2013.

Pyziak-Szafnicka, M. (2004). System Prawa Prywatnego, Prawo zobowiązań – część szczegółowa, J. Panowicz-Lipska (ed.), Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 2004.

Radwański, Z., Olejniczak, A. (2005). Zobowiązania – część ogólna, Warsaw: C.H. Beck 2005.

Sag, M. (2015). Copyright Trolling, An Empirical Study. Iowa Law Review, Volume 100, Issue 3, 1 March 2015, p. 1113.

Ślęzak, P. (2007). Dziedziczenie praw majątkowych w świetle polskiego prawa autorskiego. Rejent no 1, 2007.

Sokołowski, T. (2014). Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz. Tom III. Zobowiązania – część ogólna, A. Kidyba (ed.), available on lex database 2014.

Wall, D.S. (2015). Copyright trolling and the policing of intellectual property in the shadow of law. The SAGE Handbook of Intellectual Property, M. David and D. Halbert, (eds), London: SAGE, 2015.

Wrzesiński, P. (2015). Uchylenie się od skutków prawnych umowy ubezpieczenia na życie z ubezpieczeniowym funduszem kapitałowym na podstawie błędu lub podstępu. Prawo Asekuracyjne 2, 2015.

Wrzeszcz, O. (2016). Trolling prawnoautorski (copyright trolling). Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z prawa własności intelektualnej z. 134, 2016.

Zygmunt, J. (2017). Przesyłanie plików za pośrednictwem sieci peer-to-peer a rozpowszechnienie utworu w rozumieniu prawa autorskiego. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego no. 1, 2017.

URL: http://www.uprp.pl/ostrzezenie-przed-wprowadzajacymi-w-blad-wezwaniami-do-zaplaty-lub-fakturami/Lead51,795,1375,7,index,pl,text/ (19.11. 2019).

URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/letters-alleging-online-copyright-infringement/letters-alleging-online-copyright-infringement.

URL: https://www.uokik.gov.pl/about_us.php.

Judgement of the Supreme Court of December 1, 1999, case reference no I CKN 203/98 (lex database, no. 50687).

Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of June 23, 2015, case reference no. SK 32/14 (lex database OTK-A 2015/6/84).

Judgement of the Administrative Court in Poznań of November 7, 2007, case reference no. I ACa 800/07 (lex database, no. 370747).




How to Cite

Lewandowska, E. (2020). On copyright trolling in the framework of civil law. Problems of Legality, (150), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.150.205798




Most read articles by the same author(s)