DOI: https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.149.201832

Parliamentary responsibility of the government in the european countries

Алла Анатоліївна Гринчак

Abstract


The article reveals the features of parliamentary responsibility of the governments of Western Europe. When the government or some of its members is to be failing to carry out their duties, parliament can initiate procedures which  have  the  potential  to  replace  all  or  part  of  the  government.  There are two different types of procedure. One is the withdrawal of confidence in the government or in individual ministers. The requirement for a certain minimum number of votes to be obtained before such motions can be initiated or passed highlights the relative strengths of the different political groups within parliament. Where the government has a parliamentary majority, it can usually count on that majority to block the motions. The majority of the parliaments in Europe allow votes of no confidence in the government.  Where the legitimacy of the government rests on parliamentary confidence, the withdrawal or denial of confidence by parliament can force the government out of power. For a vote of no confidence to be passed an absolute majority of all members of the chamber (or chambers, if votes are taken in joint session) is required. Where the collective responsibility of  the Cabinet  is  stressed, a votum of no confidence againstindividual members is prohibited. Several parliaments admit both collective and individual responsibility and allow both types of no confidence motions. The difference between votum of no confidence in the government as a whole and votum against individual ministers were researched.

It is concluded that institute of government’ parliamentary responsibility of is the an integral feature of a democratic state with parliamentarianism, ensuring the optimal functioning of the highest bodies of state legislative and executive power.


Keywords


parliament; responsibility; government; votum of confidence; votum of no confidence

References


Huber, J.D. The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 90, 2 (Jun., 1996), 269–282. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/79c1/44f773525e90c6596f865bab6068ff7e3831.pdf?_ga=2.165723454.1039676464.1585315757-1355746318.1585315757.

Shapoval, V.M. (2016). Vykonavcha vlada (teoretychnyi i konstytutsiinyi aspekty). Kyiv. URL: https://www.pravo.org.ua/img/books/files/1482222100executive%20authority.pdf.

Serohina, S.H. (2011). Forma pravlinnia: pytannia konstytutsiino-pravovoi teorii ta praktyky. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Teare, C. Cabinet Durability within Parliamentary Democracies: The Italian Model. URL: https://www.creighton.edu/fileadmin/user/CCAS/departments/PoliticalScience/Journal_of_Political_Research__JPR_/JPR_2010/Teare_paper_final.pdf.

Lipton, J. Responsible Government, Representative Democracy and the Senate: Options for Reform. URL: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UQLawJl/1997/2.pdf.

Bulmer, E. Government Formation and Removal Mechanisms. URL: http://constitutionnet.org/sites/default/files/2017-10/government-formation-and-removal-mechanisms-primer.pdf.

Siaroff, A. Varieties of Parliamentarianism in the Advanced Industrial Democracies. International Political Science Review. Revue internationale de science politique, Vol. 24, 4 (Oct., 2003), 445–464. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1601632.

Konstitucii stran mira. URL: https://legalns.com/компетентные-юристы/правовая-библиотека/конституции-стран-мира.

Russo, F., Verzichelli, L. The adoption of positive and negative parliamentarism: systemic or odiosyncratic differences? URL: https://www.sv.uio.no/isv/english/research/projects/evolution-parliamentarism/events/seminars/ecpr-salamanca-russoverzichelli.pdf.

Pensionnuju reformu vo Francii utverdjat v obhod parlamenta. URL: https://zib.com.ua/ru/141694-pensionnuyu_reformu_vo_francii_utverdyat_v_obhod_parlamenta.html.

Parliamentary Oversight of the Executive Branch: Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States. August 2017. P. 6–11. URL: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/parliamentary-oversight/parliamentary-oversight.pdf.

Dzhuzeppe Konte pohodyvsia ocholyty novyi uriad Italii. URL: https://www.unn.com.ua/uk/news/1822546-dzhuzeppe-konte-pogodivsya-ocholiti-noviy-uryad-italiyi.

Vote of Confidence Procedure and "Gesetzgebungsnotstand": Two Tooth- and Clawless German Tigers of Governmental Agenda Control https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/e806ebc7-e2fd-4f5a-87fa-25c33c1a63eb.pdf.

Avak'jan, S.A. (Ed.). (2014). Organizacija gosudarstvennoj vlasti v Rossii i zarubezhnyh stranah. Moscow: Justicinform. URL: https://istina.msu.ru/media/publications/book/7db/f70/8114482/Organizatsiya_gosudarstvennoj_vlasti_v_Rossii_i_zarubezhnyih_stranah.pdf.


GOST Style Citations


  1. Huber J. D. The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 90, No. 2 (Jun., 1996), pp. 269-282. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2082884?read-now=1&refreqid=excelsior%3Abd1d01b4c8d80f009ceddb2e8cf8bd54&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents; https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/79c1/44f773525e90c6596f865bab6068ff7e3831.pdf?_ga=2.165723454.1039676464.1585315757-1355746318.1585315757.
  2. Шаповал В. М. Виконавча влада (теоретичний і конституційний аспекти). Київ, 2016. 82 с. URL: https://www.pravo.org.ua/img/books/files/1482222100executive%20authority.pdf.
  3. Серьогіна С. Г. Форма правління: питання конституційно-правової теорії та практики : монографія. Харків : Право, 2011. 768 с.
  4. Teare C. Cabinet Durability within Parliamentary Democracies: The Italian Model. URL: https://www.creighton.edu/fileadmin/user/CCAS/departments/PoliticalScience/Journal_of_Political_Research__JPR_/JPR_2010/Teare_paper_final.pdf.
  5. Lipton J. Responsible Government, Representative Democracy and the Senate: Options for Reform. URL: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UQLawJl/1997/2.pdf.
  6. Bulmer E. Government Formation and Removal Mechanisms. URL: http://constitutionnet.org/sites/default/files/2017-10/government-formation-and-removal-mechanisms-primer.pdf.
  7. Siaroff A. Varieties of Parliamentarianism in the Advanced Industrial Democracies. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. Vol. 24. No. 4 (Oct., 2003). Рp. 445-464. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1601632.
  8. Конституции стран мира. URL: https://legalns.com/компетентные-юристы/правовая-библиотека/конституции-стран-мира.
  9. Russo F., Verzichelli L. The adoption of positive and negative parliamentarism: systemic or odiosyncratic differences? URL: https://www.sv.uio.no/isv/english/research/projects/evolution-parliamentarism/events/seminars/ecpr-salamanca-russoverzichelli.pdf.
  10. Пенсионную реформу во Франции утвердят в обход парламента. URL: https://zib.com.ua/ru/141694-pensionnuyu_reformu_vo_francii_utverdyat_v_obhod_parlamenta.html.
  11. Parliamentary Oversight of the Executive Branch: Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States. August 2017. P. 6-11. URL: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/parliamentary-oversight/parliamentary-oversight.pdf.
  12. Джузеппе Конте погодився очолити новий уряд Італії. URL: https://www.unn.com.ua/uk/news/1822546-dzhuzeppe-konte-pogodivsya-ocholiti-noviy-uryad-italiyi.
  13. Vote of Confidence Procedure and "Gesetzgebungsnotstand": Two Tooth- and Clawless German Tigers of Governmental Agenda Control. URL: https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/e806ebc7-e2fd-4f5a-87fa-25c33c1a63eb.pdf.
  14. Организация государственной власти в России и зарубежных странах. Учебно-методический комплекс / рук. авт. кол. и отв. ред. проф. Авакьян С. А. Москва : Юстицинформ, 2014. 692 с. URL: https://istina.msu.ru/media/publications/book/7db/f70/8114482/Organizatsiya_gosudarstvennoj_vlasti_v_Rossii_i_zarubezhnyih_stranah.pdf.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




Copyright (c) 2020 Алла Анатоліївна Гринчак

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2224-9281