Strategic autonomy of the European Union: on the way to «European Sovereignty» in defense?


  • Іван Васильович Яковюк Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого, Ukraine
  • Олеся Янівна Трагнюк Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого, Ukraine
  • Бойчук Дмитро Сергійович Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого,



strategic autonomy, sovereignty, defense, security policy, EU Global Strategy, European Union, NATO, member state


2019 marked 20 years since EU Member States decided to create a joint EU approach to security and defense. The paper raises the question on finding new approaches to provide security and defense in Europe in the current context, as well as the formation of a new paradigm for research on regional security in Europe. Traditional approaches to the study of European integration (neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism) are of little use for theorizing the development of European defense in conditions of new challenges and threats to national and regional security, as well as transatlantic solidarity violations. The article studies European Strategic Autonomy (ESA), which refers to the ability of the European Union, in conjunction with Member States, to independently determine its own priorities according to which to take decisions and implement them in the fields of foreign policy, security and defense. ESA is not synonymous with independence, nor does it deny membership in military-political alliances, since a more realistic scenario implies positioning itself as a European pillar of NATO. The implementation of the idea of building a "european sovereignty" in the field of security and defense implies that the European Union should take bigger responsibility for its own security, the security of its neighbors, andshould strengthen its role in transatlantic relations without opposing NATO. In order to move from rhetoric to concrete policy steps, the EU needs to develop a plan of measures for political, institutional and industrial action. It means that achieving real autonomy requires time and joint efforts by EU institutions and Member State governments. However, political and institutional autonomy can be built exclusively within the whole Union, while military-industrial autonomy can be initiated and implemented by a group of the most economically and technologically advanced EU Member States.

Author Biographies

Іван Васильович Яковюк, Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

завідувач кафедри права Європейського Союзу

Олеся Янівна Трагнюк, Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

доцент кафедри права Європейського Союзу

Бойчук Дмитро Сергійович, Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

асистент кафедри права Європейського Союзу


A National Security Strategy for a New Century. Wash.: The White House, 1999. P. III-IV, 1.

Appropriate level of European Strategic Autonomy. #8. ARES-Group-Report. November 2016. URL:

Bartels, H.-P., Kellner, A.M., Optenhögel, U. (Hg.) (2017). Strategic Autonomy and the Defence of Europe. On the Road to a European Army? URL:

Brexit, defence, and the EU’s quest for «strategic autonomy». URL:

Bytyak, Y., Yakovyuk, I., Tragniuk, O., Komarova, T., Shestopal, S. (2017). The State Sovereignty and Sovereign Rights: The Correlation Problem. Man In India, 97, 577–588.

Cabirol, M. (2020). Souveraineté de la France et de l'Europe: ce que veut vraiment Emmanuel Macron. URL:

Cline, R.S. (1977). World Power Assessment: A Calculus of Strategic Drift. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Pp. ix, 206.

Consolidated Texts of the EU Treaties as Amended by the Treaty of Lisbon. URL:

Defence industrial links between the EU and the US: Report. #20. September 2017. Р. 38–40. URL:

Dockrill, S. (1991). Britain’s Policy for West German Rearmament, 1950–1955. Cambridge, N. Y.

EE UU amenaza a Europa con represalias si impulsa en solitario sus proyectos de defensa. URL:

Envisioning European defence. Five futures. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies. Chaillot Paper Nº 137, March 2016. 50 p. URL:

EU Global Strategy Implementation Plan on Security and Defence, 17 November 2016. URL:

European Commission - Fact Sheet. The European Defence Action Plan – FAQs. Brussels, 30 November 2016. URL:

European security in crisis: what to expect if the US withdraws from NATO. URL:

European Security Strategy «A Secure Europe in a Better Word». URL:

Europe’s dependence on the US was all part of the plan. Postwar US statesmen designed our world order as it is for a reason. They had lived through what happened without it. URL:

EU to propose joint defence fund. URL:

Fiott, D. (2018). Strategic autonomy: towards ‘European sovereignty’ in defence? European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS). URL:

Frontini, A. (2015). Federalist rhetoric or political tactics? The what, where, who, when and why of Juncker’s call for a common European army. EPC Commentary, 12 March 2015. URL:

Gaub, F. (2010). Military integration after civil wars: Multiethnic armies, identity and post-conflict reconstruction. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203841051.

Howorth, J., Keeler, J. T. S. (2003). Defending Europe: the EU, NATO and the Quest for European Autonomy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 3–21.

Hetman, А.Р., Yakoviyk, I.V. (2019). Ideas of national and regional safety and their reflection in the European integration projects: history and contemporaneity. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Joint declaration by the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission, and the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. URL:

JunckerJean-Claude. A New Start for Europe: My Agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change Political Guidelines for the next European Commission Opening Statement in the European Parliament Plenary Session, Strasbourg, 15 July 2014. URL:

Kielmansegg, S. graf von (2019). The Historical Development of EU Defence Policy: Lessons for the Future? URL:

Knutsen, Bjørn-Olav (2016). European defence research in crisis? The way towards strategic autonomy. Global Affairs, Vol. 2(3), 287–295.

Leonard, M., Shapiro, J. Strategic sovereignty: How Europe can regain the capacity to act. URL:

Mérand, F. (2008). European Defence Policy: Beyond the Nation State. URL: doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199533244.001.0001.

Mérand, F. (2008). European Security in Crisis (Contributor Webpage). Mérand F. European Defence Policy: Beyond the Nation State. URL: doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199533244.003.0005.

Mérand, F. (2008). The Internationalization of European Armed Forces. URL: doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199533244.003.0003.

Oosterveld, W., Torossia, B. Political Violence in the European Periphery Trends, Threats and Root Causes. URL:

Overview of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) first collaborative projects. European Council. URL:

Permanent Structured Cooperation – PESCO Deepening Defence Cooperation among EU Member States. URL: 10 2017_1.pdf.

Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union's defence industry PE/28/2018/REV/1. URL:

Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy «Providing Security in a Changing World». Brussels, 11 December 2008, S407/08. URL:

Smith, M. E. (2016). Implementing the Global Strategy where it matters most: the EU’s credibility deficit and the European neighbourhood. Journal Contemporary Security Policy. Vol. 37, Issue 3, 446–460. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2016.1240467.

Speech of the President of the Republic Emmanuel Macron on the Defense and Deterrence Strategy (07 Feb. 20). URL:

The European Defence Action Plan. Challenges and perspectives for a genuine transatlantic defence and industrial relationship. URL:

The European Defence Fund: Questions and Answers. URL:

Towards a better Europe — A Europe that protects, empowers and defends. State of the Union 2016, by Jean-Claude Juncker,President of the European Commission 14 September 2016. URL:

Towards «European Soverignty» in Security and Deefence? URL:

Tragniuk, O.Y. (2018). Legal and organizational instruments of the EU common defense policy implementation at the present stage. Problemy zakonnosti – Problems of Legality, issue 143, 249–257.

Wagner W. and Anholt R. (2016). Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s new leitmotif: pragmatic, problematic or promising? Journal Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 37, Issue 3, 414–430. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2016.1228034.

Yakovyuk, І.V., Orlovskyy, R.R. (2017). European Defence Community: origins of integration in the defence sphere. Problemy zakonnosti – Problems of Legality, issue 139, 264–277. doi: 10.21564/2414-990x.139.115332 [in Ukrainian].

Yakoviyk, I.V., Shestopal, S.S., Baranov, P.P., Blokhina, N.A. (2019). State sovereignty and sovereign rigts: EU and national sovereignty. Opcion, 34 (87-2), 376–385.




How to Cite

Яковюк, І. В., Трагнюк, О. Я., & Сергійович, Б. Д. (2020). Strategic autonomy of the European Union: on the way to «European Sovereignty» in defense?. Problems of Legality, (149), 223–242.




Most read articles by the same author(s)