Principles of administrative and legal support for the functioning and development of juvenile justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.147.178179Keywords:
administrative and legal support, child, minor, principle of juvenile justice, systematization, functioning, juvenile justiceAbstract
The juvenile system is a form of ensuring the rights of children. The practical implementation of many of the foundations of the functioning and development of the juvenile justice system is related to public administration, the internal systemic administrative activities of the judiciary, the prosecutor's office, preliminary investigation bodies, the human rights ombudsman, and the introduction and development of non-criminal measures against minor delinquents. At the same time, the principles of public administration and other manifestations of administrative and legal activity in the field of juvenile justice, which provide a significant part of its functioning, remain beyond the due attention of scientists.
This article focuses on the principles of the institution of juvenile justice at the level of a separate branch of law (administrative).
In the context of the system of principles of juvenile justice (general and special), a definition is presented, as well as the place of the principles of administrative and legal support and their relationship with other groups of principles. General principles lay ideas common to all legal relations, which are then reflected in special principles. The principles of administrative and legal support for the functioning and development of juvenile justice are referred to the group of special (concrete-functional and (or) specific) foundations. These principles inherit the basic features inherent in the principles of administrative law and are determined by the axiology of this branch of law.
Summarizing the results of a number of administrative and legal studies, a list of principles of administrative and legal support for the functioning and development of the juvenile justice system is given, which are divided into three groups: 1) organizational and security principles, 2) functional principles; 3) administrative jurisdictional principles.
References
Novikova, T.Yu. (2003). Administrativno-pravovaya organizaciya zashchity prav nesovershennoletnih organami yuvenalnoj yusticii [Administrative and legal organization for the protection of the rights of minors by juvenile justice bodies]. Candidate’s thesis. URL: http://www.dissercat.com/content/administrativno-pravovaya-organizatsiya-zashchity-prav-nesovershennoletnikh-organami-yuvenal [in Russian].
Levchenko, V.O. (2011). Administratyvno-pravovi peredumovy stvorennia orhaniv yuvenalnoi yustytsii v Ukraini [Administrative and legal preconditions for the establishment of juvenile justice bodies in Ukraine]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Boiaryntseva, M. (2015). Pryntsypy Yevropeiskoho administratyvnoho prostoru ta yikh realizatsiia v Ukraini [Principles of the European Administrative Space and their implementation in Ukraine]. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights, Vol. 5/1, 6–12. URL: http://vjhr.sk/archive/2015_5_1/3.pdf (Date Views: 11.08.2019) [in Ukrainian].
Koliushko, I. & Tymoshchuk, V. (Eds.). (2006). Efektyvna publichna administratsiia (dovidnyk dlia ministriv) [Effective Public Administration (Handbook for Ministers)]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kravtsova, T.M. & Solonar, A.V. (2010). Poniattia ta pryntsypy diialnosti publichnoi administratsii [Concepts and principles of public administration activity]. Forum prava – Forum of Law, 4, 522–525. URL: http://dspace.univd.edu.ua/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/3359/
Poniattia%20ta%20pryntsypy%20diialnosti%20_Kravtsova%20_Solonar_2010.pdf?sequence=1 [in Ukrainian].
Krestovska, N.M. (2008). Yuvenalne pravo Ukrainy: henezys ta suchasnyi stan [Juvenile Law of Ukraine: Genesis and Contemporary Condition]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
Pohrebniak, S. (2012). Pryntsyp proportsiinosti u sudovii diialnosti [The principle of proportionality in judicial activity]. Filosofiia prava i zahalna teoriia prava – Philosophy of Law and general theory of Law, 2, 49–55. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/filpr_2012_2_6 [in Ukrainian].
Puzyrnyi, V. (2017). Pryntsypy administratyvno-yurysdyktsiinoi diialnosti v ustanovakh vykonannia pokaran [Principles of administrative and jurisdictional activity in penitentiary institutions]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo – Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 11, 120–122. URL: http://pgp-journal.kiev.ua/archive/2017/11/26.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Pukhtetska, A.A. (2007). Yevropeiski pryntsypy administratyvnoho prava ta yikh dzherela [European principles of administrative law and their sources]. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava – Actual problems of the State and Law, 35, 128–132. URL: http://www.apdp.in.ua/v35/29.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Serhiienko, K.A. (2011). Pryntsypy administratyvno-yurysdyktsiinoi diialnosti orhaniv vykonavchoi vlady [Principles of administrative and jurisdictional activity of executive authorities]. Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis. Zaporizhzhia [in Ukrainian].
Soloviova, O.M. (2011). Pryntsypy administratyvnoi protsedury [Principles of administrative procedure]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriia «Pravo» – Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. The series «Law», 10(988), 149–155. URL: http://jurfak.univer.kharkov.ua/naukghittia/vystnyk/988.pdf#page=149 [in Ukrainian].
Gilbert, J. Grimm R. & Parnham J. (2001). Applying Therapeutic Principles to a Family-Focused Juvenile Justice Model (Delinquency). Alabama Law Review, 52, 1152–1207. URL: https://jpo.wrlc.org/bitstream/handle/11204/3409/Applying%20Therapeutic%20Principles%20to%20a%20Family-Focused%20Juvenile%20Justice%20Model%20Delinquency.pdf?sequence=3.
Christoffersen, J. (2009). Fair Balance: A Study of Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden – Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. URL: https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=T2OcpCA-2LQC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Frías Armenta, M. & Gómez Martínez, L. (2014). Juvenile Justice in Mexico. Laws, 3, 580–597. doi: 10.3390/laws3030580.Kurinnyi, Ye.V. (2004). Predmet i obiekt administratyvnoho prava Ukrainy: kharakterystyka katehorii v umovakh systemnoho reformuvannia [The subject and object of administrative Law of Ukraine: characteristic of categories in the conditions of systemic reforming]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
European Court of Human Rights. (2018). Case of M.R. and D.R. v. Ukraine (Application no. 63551/13, 22 May 2018). Strasbourg. URL: https://laweuro.com/?p=7681.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Микола Юрійович Веселов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
