Modern paradigms and models of juval justice

Authors

  • Николай Юрьевич Веселов Національний університет «Одеська юридична академія», Криворізький факультет, Україна, м. Кривий Ріг, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.146.174553

Keywords:

child, minor, model, paradigm, juvenile justice

Abstract

Modern juvenile justice is a system of international legal foundations, scientific ideas and a set of concepts of influence on children, their social environment, state and public institutions for the prevention of unlawful behavior among minors, protection and assistance to children in conflict with or dangerous or harmful situation (conditions). Despite the fact that juvenile justice as a social and legal institution ensuring the rights and interests of the child is based on common goals and objectives, world practice includes several typical paradigms (theoretical and methodological models) and regulatory and institutional models for the functioning of juvenile justice.

The goal of the research is to form a modern understanding of the classification of juvenile justice models as one of the institutions ensuring the rights, freedoms and interests of children. The article presents the classical system of paradigms (concepts) of juvenile justice: the rehabilitation paradigm, the punitive paradigm, the alternative or restorative paradigm. These paradigms are represented in existing models of juvenile justice, which are now operating in different countries of the world.

Several types of classification of functional models of juvenile justice are presented for consideration. The division of juvenile justice systems on a global scale into Anglo-American, Continental, Scandinavian and Asian is analyzed. The study argues the position that the presented classification should be supplemented by another separate type - the transitional (transit) model of juvenile justice. As part of this model, it is proposed to further distinguish two subgroups: transit-administrative (Russia, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan) and transit-judicial-centric (Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, etc.).

Author Biography

Николай Юрьевич Веселов, Національний університет «Одеська юридична академія», Криворізький факультет, Україна, м. Кривий Ріг

кандидат юридичних наук, доцент

References

Bejzmor, G. (n. d.). Tri paradigmy yuvenalnoj yusticii [Three paradigms of juvenile justice]. URL: http://sprc.ru/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Bejzmor-Gordon-Tri-paradigmy-yuvenal'noj-yusticii.pdf (Date Views: 24.07.2019) [in Russian].

Spon, R.D. (1998). Juvenile justice: a work «in progress». Regent University Law Review, Vol. 10, 29–51 [in English].

Krestovska, N.M. (2008). Yuvenalne pravo Ukrainy: henezys ta suchasnyi stan [Juvenile Law of Ukraine: Genesis and Contemporary Condition]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Odesa [in Ukrainian].

Sloboda, E.N. (2010). Diskussionnye voprosy o ponyatii yuvenalnoj yusticii. Pravo i demokratiya – Law and democracy, 21, 207–218 [in Russian].

Yarmoc, E.N. (2012). Institucionalnye osobennosti yuvenalnoj yusticii [Institutional features of juvenile justice]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Minsk [in Russian].

Hess, K. M. (2009). Juvenile Justice. 5-th ed. Cengage Learning [in English].

Goryan, E.V., Zabara, Z.K. (2018). Rossijskaya model yuvenalnoj yusticii: problemy effektivnogo funkcionirovaniya i puti ih ustraneniya [Russian model of juvenile justice: problems of effective functioning and ways to eliminate them]. Territoriya novyh vozmozhnostej Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa – The territory of new features. Bulletin of the Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, Vol. 10, 2, 101–116. DOI dx.doi.org/10.24866/VVSU/2073-3984/2018-2/101-116 [in Russian].

Veselov, M., Ishchenko, I. (2018). Mizhnarodna praktyka diialnosti politsii u sferi yuvenalnoi preventsii [International practice of police activity in the field of juvenile prevention]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky – Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Law Sciences, 2 (107), 12–16 [in Ukrainian].

Kudryavceva, N.I. (2003). Yuvenalnaya yusticiya v Rossii i Francii: sravnitelnaya harakteristika [Juvenile justice in Russia and France: a comparative description]. Kursk [in Russian].

Mishota, V.M. (2014). K voprosu o zashchite prav i zakonnyh interesov nesovershennoletnih [On the issue of protecting the rights and legal interests of minors]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo – Bulletin of RSUH. Series «Economy. Control. Right», 9 (131), 113–121 [in Russian].

Veselov, M.Yu., Kovalenko, P.O., Ustymenko, A.V. (2016). Kryminalne provadzhennia shchodo nepovnolitnikh: porivnialnyi analiz mizhnarodnoho i natsionalnoho (ukrainskoho) pravovoho rehuliuvannia [Criminal proceedings against minors: a comparative analysis of international and national (Ukrainian) legal regulation]. Aktualni pytannia publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava – Topical issues of public and private law, 3 (14), 83–87 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2019-09-25

How to Cite

Веселов, Н. Ю. (2019). Modern paradigms and models of juval justice. Problems of Legality, (146), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.146.174553

Issue

Section

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE