To the issue of the subjects of the legal relations for restoration of land as a constituent of the subject of land law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.155478Keywords:
subjects, restoration, land relations, protection, land owners, tenantsAbstract
In the conditions of a significant deterioration of the quality of land in Ukraine, the intensification of pollution of land, the development of erosive processes, special attention needs theoretical issues in the field of relations of the restoration of land. Particular attention deserves the subjects of legal relations of the restoration of land.
Legal problems of land restoration are extremely relevant in modern conditions. In the context of the above, it is expedient to distinguish the works of domestic scholars, however, some theoretical questions regarding the legal status of subjects of legal relations in the field of restoration of land need further research.
Consequently, the legal status of the subject of land relations depends to a certain extent on the features of the object of legal relations. Thus, in the case of conservation of degraded and unproductive land plots, there is a cessation of their economic use for a certain period of time and their entraining or afforestation. Consequently, owners and land users lose the right to use the land for a certain period of time. Thus, legal entities in the sphere of land restoration should be considered as citizens and legal entities, which have certain rights and responsibilities for the restoration of land.
Both the owners and the land users are obliged not only to increase the soil fertility and to preserve other useful properties of the land, but also to bring the land plot in its previous state in case of illegal alteration of the relief. In this case, it is a question of the disturbed lands that have undergone certain changes in the structure of the relief as a result of mining, geological exploration, construction and other work, lost their original quality status and productivity.
References
Lazarev, V.V., Lipen’, S.V. (1998). Teorija gosudarstva i prava. Moscow: Spark [in Russian].
Hropanjuk, V.N. (2006). Teorija gosudarstva i prava. V.G. Strekozov (Ed.). Moscow: Interstil’, Omega-L [in Russian].
Skakun, O.F. (2000). Teorija gosudarstva i prava. Khar’kov: Konsum [in Russian].
Alekseev, S.S. (1982). Obshhaja teorija prava. (Vols. 1–2; Vol. 2). Moscow: Jurid. lit. [in Russian].
Nadon, V.V. (2014). Struktura pravosub’iektnosti. Suchasni problemy tsyvilistyky: mate-rialy “kruhloho stolu”, prysviach. pam’iati Chinhizkhana Nufatovycha Azimova (Kharkiv, 20 hrud. 2013 r.) – Modern issues of civilization: Proceedings of the “round table” devoted to memory of Chin-gizhan Nufatovich Azimov. Kharkiv: FLP Liburkina L.M., 49–53 [in Ukrainian].
Bojcov, V.Ja. (1972). Sistema sub#ektov sovetskogo gosudarstvennogo prava. Ufa: Bashkir-skoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo [in Russian].
Hnatushchenko, Yu.V. (2008). “Sub’iekt prava” ta “sub’iekt pravovidnosyn”: spivvidnoshennia poniat. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, issue 1, 39–43 [in Ukrainian].
Kechek’jan, S.F. (1958). Pravootnoshenie v socialisticheskom obshhestve. Moscow: AN SSSR [in Russian].
Poljakov, A.V. (2004). Obshhaja teorija prava: Problemy integracii v kontekste kommunikativ-nogo podhoda. St. Petersburg [in Russian].
Alekseev, S.S., Djurjagin, I. Ja., Isakov, V.B. et al. (1987). Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava. S.S. Alekseev (Ed). Moscow: Jurid. lit. [in Russian].
Kharytonova, O.I. (2003). Deiaki problemy zahalnoi teorii pravovidnosyn. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava, іssue 21, 75–84 [in Ukrainian].
Arhipov, S.I. (2005). Sub#ekt prava (teoreticheskoe issledovanie). Extended abstract of doc-tor’s thesis. Ekaterinburg [in Russian].
Slepnev, A.V. (2007). Sootnoshenie sub#ekta prava i sub#ekta pravootnoshenija. Istorija gosu-darstva i prava, іssue 24, 38–40 [in Russian].
Charkin, S.A. (2012). Zemel’nye pravootnoshenija kak mezhotraslevaja pravovaja kategorija. Moscow: Jurajt [in Russian].
Sanzharuk, T.O. (2003). Poniattia «sub’iekt prava» ta «sub’iekt pravovidnosyn»: pytannia rozmezhuvannia. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava, issue 21, 91–95 [in Ukrainian].
Galinovskaja, E.A. (2015). Zemel’noe pravootnoshenie kak social’no-pravovoe javlenie. Moscow: Institut zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedenija pri Pravitel’stve Rossijskoj Federacii: INFRA M [in Russian].
Bondarchuk, N. (2017). Zemelni pravovidnosyny v Ukraini: suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i parvo, issue 3, 111–113 [in Ukrainian].
Shulha, M.V. Zemelni pravovidnosyny. Zemelne pravo. M.V. Shulha (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo, part 2, 49–62 [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Typovoho dohovoru orendy zemli: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 03.03.2004 r. № 220. (2004). Ofitsijnyj visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine, 9, art 527 [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku konservatsii zemel: nakaz Ministerstva ahrarnoi polityky ta pro-dovolstva vid 26.04.2013 r. № 283. (2013). Ofitsijnyj visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine, 42, art 1525 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Тетяна Вікторівна Лісова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
