On the issue of enforcement of court decisions in administrative cases

Authors

  • Ірина Володимирівна Бойко Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3878-5985

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.153912

Keywords:

execution of judicial decisions in administrative cases, administrative justice, еnforcement, subjects of execution of court decisions in administrative cases

Abstract

The article states that the real judicial protection of subjective public rights is associated with the execution of a court decision adopted in favor of a private individual. The principle of binding judgments, adopted by administrative courts, requires that the final judicial decision is performed voluntarily or in a forced manner. It was clarified that the final court decisions in administrative cases should be executed – decisions of the court of first instance, decisions of the court of appeals and cassation instances, which became legally binding, on the obligation to pass the act, to act (in particular, to make payments), to abstain from active behavior are also subject to execution of court orders, which obliges the participants of the case and other persons to perform certain actions. Execution of court decisions, which resolved a public legal dispute substantively, is considered as the stage of the trial. Compliance with the administrative

court decisions does not constitute the final stage of the trial, as only procedural issues of consideration of the case are resolved. t is offered to execute court decisions in administrative cases as acts of execution, refusal from their commission, decision-making by obligated subjects – defendants in the case, plaintiffs or other persons who are authorized to take actions and to accept acts for execution of the final court decision. The circle of subjects of execution of court decisions in administrative affairs is defined. It is analyzed, which of them can execute a court decision voluntarily, without third-party influence, and which obliges the compulsory execution of such decisions. Legislation on enforcement of judicial decisions in administrative cases consists of the Constitution of Ukraine, which contains the principle of binding judgments, the Code of Administrative Legal Proceedings of Ukraine and a number of other

Author Biography

Ірина Володимирівна Бойко, Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

доцент кафедри адміністративного права

References

Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 06.07.2005 r. № 2747-IV. URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15.

Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny vid 19.03.1997 r. «Hornsbi proty Hretsii». (1997). URL: zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_079.

Konstantyi, O.V. (2015). Problemy zakhystu v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi subiektyvnykh prav, svobod i zakonnykh interesiv. Kyiv: Istyna [in Ukrainian].

Konstantyi, O.V. (2015). Do pytannia udoskonalennia vykonannia rishen sudiv v administratyvnykh spravakh. Elektronne naukove vydannia «Iurydychnyi naukovyi zhurnal». Legal scientific journal, 1, 119–122 [in Ukrainian].

Ilnytskyi, O.V. (2011). Vykonannia sudovykh rishen u spravakh administratyvnoi yurysdyktsii: okremi pytannia zahalnykh polozhen. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu: Seriia: Yurydychna – Visnyk of Lviv University: Series: Legal, 54, 166–172 [in Ukrainian].

Krupchan, O., Perepeliuk, V. (2010). Vykonannia rishen administratyvnykh sudiv: problemy ta shliakhy vyrishennia. Yurydychna Ukraina – Legal Ukraine, 2, 4–11 [in Ukrainian].

Problemy teorii ta praktyky administratyvnoi yustytsii: zb. nauk. statei. M. I. Smokovych, M. I. Tsurkan, V. H. Perepeliuk et al. (2012). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].

Zelenov, A.S. (2018). Subъektы yspolnenyia reshenyi admynystratyvnыkh sudov. Legea şi Viaţa, 10, 36–39 [in Russian].

Sasevych, O.M. (2014). Poniattia ta pravova pryroda sudovoho kontroliu za vykonanniam sudovykh rishen v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Yuryd. nauky – Scientific Herald of Kherson State University. Series: Yurid. Science. issue. 1 (2), 235–239.

Horodovenko, V. (2012). Pryntsyp oboviazkovosti sudovoho rishennia. Visny`k Akademiyi pravovy`x nauk ukrayiny – Bulletin of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 1, 160–173. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vapny_2012_1_18.

Serdiuk, V.V. (2006). Oboviazkovist sudovoho rishennia: okremi pytannia teorii i praktyky.Visnyk prokuratury – Bulletin of the Prosecutor’s Office, 8 (62), 79–88 [in Ukrainian].

Kononenko, O. (1998). Pravove zabezpechennia vykonannia sudovykh rishen. Pravo Ukrainy – The law of Ukraine, 9, 16–18 [in Ukrainian].

Barankova, V.V. (1999). Vykonannia sudovykh rishen. Tsyvilne protsesualne pravo Ukrainy.V. V. Komarov (Ed.). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Prytyka, Yu.D. (2013). Aktualni pytannia vyznachennia poniat vyznannia ta vykonannia rishen inozemnykh sudiv. Pravo Ukrainy – The law of Ukraine, 7, 199–207 [in Ukrainian].

Pro vykonavche provadzhennia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. № 1404-VIII. URL: http:// zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1404-19.

Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. (1970). (Vols. 1– 11); Vol. 1, 411. URL: http://sum.in.ua/s/ vykonuvaty.

Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Luts proty Ukrainy» vid 31.01.2008 r. (2008). URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua /laws/show/974_339.

Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Hohin proty Ukrainy» vid 11.12.2008 r. (2008). URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show /974_420.

Krupchan, O., Perepeliuk, V. Vykonannia rishen administratyvnykh sudiv: problemy ta shliakhy vyrishennia. (2010). Yurydychna Ukraina – Legal Ukraine, 2, 4–11 [in Ukrainian].

Problemy teorii ta praktyky administratyvnoi yustytsii (2012). zb. nauk. statei M. I. Smokovych, M. I. Tsurkan, V. H. Perepeliuk et al. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 384 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2019-03-14

How to Cite

Бойко, І. В. (2019). On the issue of enforcement of court decisions in administrative cases. Problems of Legality, (144), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.153912

Issue

Section

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE