International practise of counteraction to corruption in the private sphere of the economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.143.146306Keywords:
corruption, private economy, counteraction, corporate responsibility, non-legal instrumentsAbstract
The purpose of the article is to study the practical and relevant aspects of counteraction to corruption in the private sphere of the economy of foreign countries in our time. The article examines and analyzes the international practice of combating corruption in the private economy, which is a topical and complex criminological problem that impedes the stability and growth of the economy, reduces its competitiveness, complicates investment, leads to unjustified increase of costs for companies and ultimately causes serious legal and reputational risks and forms the basis for the criminalization of private business.
The arguments presented in favor of the need to improve this area of combating crime in the entrepreneurial sphere, described the reasons that form the basis for the inclusion of corruption in the sphere of private business, has become a separate feature of the criminal interaction between business and government officials.
It is noted that the problem of corruption can not always be solved, based on classical instruments of criminal law influence. It is possible to solve these problems by introducing corporate responsibility tools into the national anti-corruption practice.
On the basis of the research, it was concluded that it is necessary to use non-legal instruments (anti-corruption training programs for personnel, establishment of business associations) capable of forming an appropriate level of legal consciousness in the business environment, which is, in our time, the main condition for counteracting corruption in the private economy.
References
Baranov, S.O. (2016). Aktualni problemy protydii ta zapobihannia koruptsii v orhanakh Derzhavnoi fiskalnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Yurysprudentsiia – International Humanitarian University Herald, issue 20, 30-33. [in Ukrainian].
Demianchuk, Yu.V. (2014). Aktualni problemy protydii koruptsii. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava – Current Problems of State and Law, issue 74, 347–353 [in Ukrainian].
Zubkova, L.A. (2017). Suchasnyi stan i problemy zapobihannia koruptsii v Ukraini. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav – Scientific Works of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 3 (104), 34–44 [in Ukrainian].
Instrument jelektronnogo obuchenija dlja chastnogo sektora «Bor'ba s korrupciej». Upravlenie OON po narkotikam i prestupnosti i Global'nyj dogovor Organizacii Ob#edinennyh Nacij. URL: http://thefightagainstcorruption.org [in Russian].
Kukina, Z.O. (2015). Porivnialno-pravova kharakterystyka kryminalnoi korporatyvnoi vidpovidalnisti v krainakh Yevropeiskoho soiuzu. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava – Chronicles of KUL, 3, 292–296 [in Ukrainian].
Maslii, I.V. (2013). Koruptsiina zlochynnist ta yii kryminolohichna kharakterystyka. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava - Current Problems of State and Law. issue 70, 356–364 [in Ukrainian].
Pobuta, M.V. (2016). Osoblyvosti stanovlennia ta protydii koruptsiinii diialnosti u sferi ekonomiky Ukrainy. Biznes Inform – Business Inform, 9, 40–46 [in Ukrainian].
Raietska, L. V. (2011). Poperedzhennia zlochynnosti u sferi ekonomiky yak zasib zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky derzhavy. Borotba z orhanizovanoiu zlochynnistiu i koruptsiieiu (teoriia i praktyka), issue 25–26, 274–281 [in Ukrainian].
Rouz-Akkerman, S. (2003) Korrupcija i gosudarstvo. Prichiny, sledstvie, reformy. Moscow: Logos [in Russian].
Khakhanovskyi, V.H. (2013). Problemy borotby z orhanizovanoiu kiberzlochynnistiu v ekonomichnii sferi. Borotba z orhanizovanoiu zlochynnistiu i koruptsiieiu (teoriia i praktyka) - The fight against organized crime and corruption (theory and practice), 2, 79–83 [in Ukrainian].
Shvedova, H.L. (2014). Suchasni kontseptsii protydii koruptsii: kryminolohichna kharakterystyka. Aktualni problemy vdoskonalennia chynnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy – Actual problems of improving the current legislation of Ukraine, issue 34, 295–302 [in Ukrainian].
Mihály Fazekas, István János Tóth, Lawrence Peter King. Аnatomy of grand corruption: A composite corruption risk index based on objective data. URL: http://www.crcb.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Fazekas-Toth-King_Composite-indicator_v2_2013.pdf.
Lucía Ixtacuy, Julián Prieto, Mónica Wills Anti-corruption revolutions: when civil society steps in. European Research Centre for Anti-Corruption and State-Building. URL: https://www.againstcorruption.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ERCAS_-WP44.pdf.
G. Vermeulen. European Union’s measures to combat fraud and corruption in order to break the link between European Union’s funding and organized crime. URL: https://lib.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/001/787/292/RUG01-001787292_ 2012_0001_AC.pdf.
Individual and Institutional Corruption in European and US Healthcare: Overview and Link of Various Corruption Typologies / M. Sommersguter-Reichmann, C. Wild, A. Stepan, G. Reichmann, A. Fried. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940713.
Tanja A. Börzel, A. Stahn. The European Union and the fight against corruption in its near abroad: can it make a difference? URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248955426_The_European_Union_and_the_fight_against_corruption_in_its_near_abroad_Can_it_make_a_difference.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014. URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf.
Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index. URL: https://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/.
Tkachuk V. People First: The latest in the watch on Ukrainian democracy. URL: https://www.kyivpost.com/article/opinion/op-ed/people-first-the-latest-in-the-watch-on-ukrainian-democracy-5-312797.html.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Ангеліна Євгенівна Симкіна
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.