Concept and ways of approaches of crime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.142.141835Keywords:
means of committing a crime, tools for the commission of a crime, the nature of the crime, criminal assault, the objective side of the crimeAbstract
In the article, means of committing a crime are considered as objects and other phenomena of objective reality, which establishes a person when committing a socially dangerous act (action or inaction) that is recognized as a crime. The means of committing a crime are proposed to be divided into instruments and other means of committing a crime, it turns out their significance for criminal liability.
Means are considered as elements of criminal behavior (socially dangerous act), their most important features are analyzed, and on the basis of the concept of "means of committing a crime" is formulated. The latter are divided into tools for committing crimes and other objects or phenomena of objective reality, used in the commission of a criminal offense as a means of its implementation. Means are also considered as a feature of the crime, and the peculiarities of their legal consolidation in the articles of the law on criminal liability are clarified.
Thus, the means of committing a crime should be defined as - separate objects, phenomena or processes of the objective world that are used by it in the course of committing a socially dangerous act in deliberate or careless crimes are separated from the person, substantially increase their damaging qualities, substantially facilitate their commission. and largely affect the social nature of the crime - its social danger. The means are inextricably linked and interdependent with all elements and features of the crime. This, in particular, expresses the influence of means as actual (objective and subjective) features, and on the social properties (social danger) of the relevant crimes, which ultimately determines the inclusion of them as a mandatory feature certain sorts of crimes and the specifics of the design of these syllables in the norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code.
References
Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy (z dodat. i dopov.). V. T. Busel (Ed.). (2005). Kyiv; Irpin: VTF «Perun» [in Ukrainian].
Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. (Vols. 1–11); Vol. 3. (1972). I. K. Bilodid (Ed.). Kyiv: Nauk. dumka [in Ukrainian].
Filosofskaja jenciklopedija. (Vols. 1–5); Vol. 5. (1970). F. V. Konstantinov (Ed.). Moscow: Sov. jenciklopedija [in Russian].
Trubnikov, N.N. (1968). O kategorijah «cel'», «sredstvo», «rezul'tat». Moscow [in Russian].
Ropakov, N.I. (1980). Kategorija «C»: problemy issledovanija. Moscow [in Russian].
Danshyn, Y.N. (2000). Professyonalnaia prestupnost: zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho Tsentru vyvchennia orhanizovanoi zlochynnosti, issue 1. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Marks, K. (1960). Kapital. Vol. 1: Process proizvodstva kapitala. Otdel tretij. Proizvodstvo absoljutnoj pribavochnoj stoimosti. Glava pjataja. Process truda i process uvelichenija stoimosti. F. Jengel's (Ed.). Moscow: Gospolitizdat [in Russian].
Saharov, V.I. (1999). Sredstva i orudija sovershenija prestuplenija i ih ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Gurov, V.I. (1983). Orudija i sredstva sovershenija prestuplenija v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Sverdlovsk [in Russian].
Denisova, A.S. (2005). Ugolovno pravovoe znachenie orudij i sredstv sovershenija prestuplenija. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Panov, M.M. (2003). Sredstva sovershenija prestuplenija: ponjatie i vidy. Problemy zakonnosti – Problems of Legality, issue 64 [in Russian].
Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia. (Vols. 1–20); Vol. 17: Kryminalne pravo. (2017). V.Ya. Tatsii, V.I. Borysov et al. (Eds.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Durmanov, N.D. (1955). Stadii sovershenija prestuplenija po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Moscow: Gosjurizdat [in Russian].
Ponomareva, N.P. (1970). Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie sposoba sovershenija prestuplenija. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Nikiforov, B.S. (1952). Bor'ba s moshennicheskimi posjagatel'stvami na socialisticheskuju sobstvennost' po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR [in Russian].
Dagel', P.S. (1977). Neostorozhnost'. Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy. Moscow, 49 [in Russian].
Kudrjavcev, V.N. (1960). Objektivnaja storona prestuplenija. Moscow [in Russian].
Dan'shin, I.N. (1982). Ponjatie i pravovoe znachenie orudij sovershenija prestuplenija. Radjans'ke pravo, 8, 58–60 [in Russian].
Malinin, V.B., Parfenov, A.F. (2004). Objektivnaja storona prestuplenija. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Ярослав Вікторович Прудников
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.