Constitutionally-legal mechanism of judicial power of Ukraine independ-ence supporting

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.141.132778

Keywords:

judiciary independence, mechanism of providing judiciary independence, the judiciary independence guarantees, the Constitutional values, the judiciary independence as a Constitutional system of Ukraine principle

Abstract

In the article in a consistent level researching the story behind, the process of global public perception valuable meaning of judicial independent idea, as well as stages of implementation of its idea in the function of direct Constitutional principle into organization and functioning the state mechanism of every modern democracy and legal-state. Pointed that realization of its important politico-legal idea in the society’s and the state’s real life is supported the proper constitutionally legal mechanism. Such mechanism usually means the integral system of statutory and regulatory as well as managerially institutional forms and recourses, which in aggregate provide social authority of judiciary, impartial justice in the form of fair and legally judgments, and indisputable and timely execution of it by all parties of public relationships free of its legal status and social status.

In the article there is integrated analysis of legal framework and the system of the state and non-state institutions partial constitutionally legal mechanism of judiciary independence supporting as well as problem spheres of it’s functionality on the modern stage of state-legal development of Ukraine. The conclusion is made that existence of statutory-regulatory regulation and institutional system totally are sufficient qualitative for the reaching the desired aim – the providing the real independence and high public authority of judiciary. The main issues were analyzed which preventing for real judiciary independence, for the main important of them are placed: the practice of unjustice adjudgment because of corruption factors; not enough high level of politico-legal culture of the judiciary establishment part; aspiration of representatives of other state authorities and certain political forces to influence for administration of justice; popularity of non-executions practice for judgments which came into legal force.

Author Biography

Дмитро Володимирович КУЛЕШОВ, Deputy Head of the Slavyansk Prosecution Office of Donetsk region

Deputy Head of the Slavyansk Prosecution Office of Donetsk region, Postgraduate Student of the Chair of Constitutional Law of Ukraine

 

References

Smorodynskyi, V.S. (2009). Ideia pravosuddia v istorii pravnychoi dumky. Pravosuddia: filosofske ta teoretychne osmyslennia – Justice: Philosophical and Theoretical Understanding. V. S. Bihun (Ed.). Kyiv: Biblioteka Mizhnarodnoho chasopysu «Problemy filosofii prava», Part. 2, 46-63 [in Ukrainian].

Prudnikov, M.N. (2013). Istorija gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnyh stran: uchebnik dlja bakalavrov.Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Jurajt ; ID Jurajt [in Russian].

Astapenko, P.N. (2018). Rimskoe pravo. N. V. Mykhailova (Ed.).Moscow: KNORUS [in Russian].

Lapteva, M.Ju., Manzjuk, A.P. Organizacija sudebnogo processa v grecheskih polisah VIII–V vv. do n. je. (po dannym literaturnyh istochnikov, jepig-rafiki i arheologii). (2014). Istorija i arheologija – History and archaeology, 10. URL: http://history.snauka.ru/2014/10/1228 [in Russian].

Tokvil', Aleksis de. (1992). Demokratija v Amerike.Moscow: Progress [in Russian].

Konstytutsiine pravo Ukrainy. V. P. Kolisnyka, Yu. H. Barabasha (Eds). (2008). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Todyka, Ju.N. (2000). Konstitucija Ukrainy: problemy teorii i praktiki.Kharkov: Fakt [in Ukrainian].

Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. № 1402-VIII. (2016). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 31, art. 545.

Pro sudovu ekspertyzu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. № 1402-VIII. (1994) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 28, art. 232.

Pro vykonavche provadzhennia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. № 1402-VIII. (2016). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 30, art. 542.

Pro vidnovlennia doviry do sudovoi vlady v Ukraini: Zakon Ukrainy vid 08.04.2014 r. № 1188–VII. (2014). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 23, art. 870.

Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 r. 4651-VI (2013). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 910, art. 88.

Pro Stratehiiu staloho rozvytku "Ukraina–2020": Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 12.01.2015 r. № 5/2015. (2015). Ofitsijnyj visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine, 4, art. 67.

Pro zatverdzhennia Natsionalnoi stratehii u sferi prav liudyny: Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 25.08.2015 r. № 501/2015. (2015). Ofitsijnyj visnyk UkrainyOfficial Gazette of Ukraine, 69, art. 2257.

Konstytutsiine pravo zarubizhnykh krain. V. O. Riiaky (Ed). (2006). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].

Pritchenko R. S. (2011). Sudebnaja vlast' i politika – nezavisimost' ili vzaimosvjaz': sravnitel'no-pravovoj analiz. Pravova derzhava, 13, 215218.

Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro Ministerstvo yustytsii Ukrainy: Po-stanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 02.07.2014 r. № 228. (2014). Ofitsijnyj visnyk UkrainyOfficial Gazette of Ukraine Ofitsijnyj visnyk UkrainyOfficial Gazette of Ukraine, 54, art. 1455.

Pro Vyshchu radu pravosuddia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 21.12.2016 r. № 1798-VIII. (2017). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 78, art. 50.

Shtefan, Gass. (2007). Deiaki sposterezhennia shchodo nezalezhnosti sudu, yak vona prezentovana u mizhnarodnykh dokumentakh ta dosvidi. Visnyk Tsentru suddivskykh studii, 10, 2532 [in Ukrainian].

Kutsenko, V.D. (2017). Zavdannia ta funktsii Derzhavnoi sudovoi administratsii: administratyvno-pravovi aspekty. Visnyk penitentsiarnoi asotsiatsii Ukrainy, 2, 92101 [in Ukrainian].

Prylutskyi, S.V. (2009). Samoorhanizatsiia sudovoi vlady yak novitnii pravovyi instytut rozvynutoi demokratii. Sudova apeliatsiia, 1(14), 124135 [in Ukrainian].

Riven vykonannia sudovykh rishen v Ukraini za rik zris utrychi – Ministr yustytsii. URL: http://ua.interfax.com.ua/news/general/467640.html [in Ukrainian].

Problemy vykonannia rishen sudiv dosi aktualni – holova Vinnytsko-ho apeliatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu Vitalii Kuzmyshyn. URL: https://court.gov.ua/press/interview/399785/ [in Ukrainian].

Pro orhany ta osib, yaki zdiisniuiut prymusove vykonannia sudovykh ri-shen i rishen inshykh orhaniv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. №403-VIII. (2016). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady, 29, art. 535.

Zvit za rezultatamy sotsiolohichnoho doslidzhennia «Stavlennia hroma-dian Ukrainy do sudovoi systemy». Kyiv, 2017: Ukrainskyi tsentr ekonomichnykh i politychnykh doslidzhen imeni Oleksandra Razumkova; Rada suddiv Ukrainy; Pro-ekt Rady Yevropy «Pidtrymka vprovadzhenniu sudovoi reformy v Ukraini». URL: http://rsu.gov.ua/uploads/article/final-report-survey-e07f150174.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Published

2018-06-12

How to Cite

КУЛЕШОВ, Д. В. (2018). Constitutionally-legal mechanism of judicial power of Ukraine independ-ence supporting. Problems of Legality, (141), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.141.132778

Issue

Section

Constitutional Law