The concept of enrichment within the context of condictio obligation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.141.128690Keywords:
unjustified enrichment, condictio, condictio action, non-contractual obligationAbstract
The article addresses the concept of enrichment within the context of obligations arising out of the unjustified acquisition or retention of assets (also known as condictio obligations). Having analyzed critically two current theories (namely the “factual” enrichment theory and “juridical” enrichment theory) the author concludes that enrichment can consist both in the acquisition of jus in rem and in title-less possession and use of the property. Within this framework it is also argued that both specified and generic things can constitute the object of enrichment. The author critically assesses the provision of Ukrainian legislation under which only the property can be the object of enrichment, since there are a lot of other assets that have economic value though they are not encompassed in legislative definition of property. However, those assets are covered by a broader concept, viz the concept of “objects of civil rights”.
References
Belianevych, O. A. (2014). Deiaki pytannia zastosuvannia statti 1212 Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Visnyk hospodarskoho sudochynstva. 4. S. 63-73 [in Ukrainian].
Berestova, I. E. (2004). Zoboviazannia z nabuttia, zberezhennia maina bez dostatnoi pravovoi pidstavy. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Berngeft, F., Kohler, J. (1910). Grazhdanskoe pravo Germanii. Saint-Petersburg: Senatskaya Tipografiya [in Russian].
Bryntsev, O. (2009). Zastosuvannia kondyktsii v zemelnykh pravovidnosynakh. Pravo Ukrainy. 9. S. 68-73 [in Ukrainian].
Budneva, G. N., Vasilev, E. A., Gribanov, A. V. and others. (2005). Grazhdanskoe i torgovoe pravo zarubezhnyih gosudarstv. Moscow : Mezhdunarodnyie otnosheniya. Vol. 1 [in Russian].
Venediktova, I. V. (2012) Okhoroniuvanyi zakonom interes v kondyktsiinykh zoboviazanniakh. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Pravo». Issue 1028. 129-132.
Gerbutov, V. S. (2014). Ponyatie i formyi obogascheniya v kondiktsionnyih obyazatelstvah. Candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Honcharov, I. V. (2016). Tsyvilno-pravovi zoboviazannia, shcho vynykaiut vnaslidok bezpidstavnoho zbahachennia (porivnialno-pravove doslidzhennia za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy ta krain Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu). Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Iefymenko, I. V. (2011). Vydy kondyktsiinykh zoboviazan. Problemy zakonnosti. Issue 113. 205-212 [in Ukrainian].
Ignatenko, V. N. (2001). Realizatsiya obyazatelstva iz neosnovatelnogo obogascheniya. Izvestiya Vyisshih uchebnyih zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. 2. 90-97 [in Russian].
Karnaukh, B. (2017). Bezpidstavne zbahachennia u pravi Davnoho Rymu. Problemy zakonnosti. Issue 138. 17-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.138.108137 [in Ukrainian].
Karnaukh, B. (2017). Bezpidstavne zbahachennia u pravi Davnoho Rymu: zahalna kharakterystyka. Problemy tsyvilnoho prava ta protsesu: proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference. Kharkiv: KhNUVS, 254-256 [in Ukrainian].
Karnaukh, B. P. (2016). Poniattia maina v konteksti statti 1 Protokolu № 1 do Yevropeiskoi konventsii pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod. Problemy zakonnosti. Issue. 132. 205-214. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.132.59090 [in Ukrainian].
Karhalev, D. N. (2009). Kondiktsionnyie ohranitelnyie pravootnosheniya. Rossiyskiy sudya. 2009. 12. 21-24 [in Russian].
Nazimov, I. A. (2013). Sootnoshenie vindikatsii i trebovaniy iz neosnovatelnogo obogascheniya. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 1. 131-137 [in Russian].
Podtserkovnyi, O. P., Oliukha, V. H. (2013). Pro zastosuvannia instytutu bezpidstavnoho zbahachennia pry rozrakhunkakh u pidriadnykh vidnosynakh. Visnyk hospodarskoho sudochynstva. 3. 147-153 [in Ukrainian].
Decision of Supreme Court, 02 March 2016, case No. 6-3090цс15. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/56280404 (date of access: 26.03.2018).
Decision of Supreme Court, 29 January 2018, case No. 910/12574/17. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/71860584 (date of access: 26.03.2018).
Decision of Supreme economic court of Ukraine, 01 March 2012, case No. 5002-29/3157-2011 URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/21677519 (date of access: 26.03.2018).
Decision of Supreme economic court of Ukraine, 10 June 2013, case No. 23/5014/2330/2012 URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/31893404 (date of access: 26.03.2018).
Decision of Supreme economic court of Ukraine, 10 December 2014, case No. 6-30166св14 URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/41993312 (date of access: 26.03.2018).
Decision of Supreme economic court of Ukraine, 12 January 2017, case No. http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/64098867">922/51/15 URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/64098867 (date of access: 26.03.2018).
Decision of Supreme economic court of Ukraine, 22 September 2011, case No. 5002-25/125-2011 URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/18383147 (date of access: 26.03.2018).
Puchkova H. V. (2007). Zoboviazannia, shcho vynykaiut vnaslidok bezpidstavnoho zbahachennia, za rymskym pryvatnym pravom ta yikh retseptsiia u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy. Candidate’s thesis. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
Romaniuk, Ya. M. (2014). Restytutsiia, vindykatsiia, kondyktsiia, vidshkoduvannia shkody: okremi aspekty spivvidnoshennia ta rozmezhuvannia. Visnyk Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy. 10. 22-31 [in Ukrainian].
Solomina, N. G. (2009). Universalnost kondiktsionnogo obyazatelstva v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. Doctor’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Spasibo-Fateeva, I. V. (Ed.). (2014). Harkovskaya tsivilisticheskaya shkola: zaschita sub'ektivnyih grazhdanskih prav i interesov. Kharkov: Pravo [in Russian].
Zweigert, K. Kotz, H. (1998). Vvedenie v sravnitelnoe pravovedenie: v 2 t. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyie otnosheniya. Vol. 2. [in Russian].
Fiorentini, F., Antoniolli, L. (2011). A Factual Assessment of the Draft Common Frame of Reference. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Євгенія Анатоліївна Ваштарева
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
