Teaching anti-corruption in the caucasus and black sea region(s)
There is hardly a topic in the current transformations that is as central as corruption. Anti-corruption efforts go back to the nineties when globalisation turned the world into a corporate playing field. Since then, a wealth of tools and instruments has been invented, and any student of anti-corruption can be certain to find abundant materials. From a teacher’s perspective, turning these materials into a coherent academic subject is the first challenge.
But anti-corruption is not a subject like any other. If taught properly, it should challenge every student’s moral compass and become a catalyst for the development of professional ethics. Anybody who has ever been forced to pay bribes in a university setting will remember «turning red with shame». Bribing your teacher, as compared to a traffic police or customs officer, seems like the ultimate betrayal of the notion of the intellectual community between scholar/teacher and student, and it throws into doubt the entire system of values and goals that higher education stands for. In its effect, it is as pernicious as doping in sports. And when the shame is overcome, the result will be a graduate who is «street-wise», who is ready to play the game and expect nothing less from his or her colleagues.
Against this background, the purpose of this paper is twofold. It serves as a reflection on the state of anti-corruption efforts in the Black Sea and Caucasus region(s) and suggests a model how electronic resources could become a catalyst in bringing blended learning/teaching on anti-corruption to the region(s). At the same time, it develops the scholarly argument that the «toolkit box approach» favoured by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) is not sufficient to address the root causes of corruption in the region(s). As an alternative and to the extent that it concerns the Black Sea and Caucasus region(s), it is suggested to place anti-corruption more firmly into the context of Europeanisation as part of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and the Eastern Partnership (EaP), in particular. As such, it should be integrally linked to the support of civil society, independent media, independence and integrity of the judiciary, and open government.
Thomas Kruessmann (ed.). Moving beyond the ‘Kosovo Precedence’. EU Integration forMoldovaand theSouth Caucasus, LIT Verlag: Zurich 2015.
Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy of 18 November 2015, JOIN(2015) 50 final.
The European Agenda on Security of 28 April 2015, COM(2015) 185 final.
Dirk Tänzler, Konstadinos Maras, Angelos Giannakopoulos. The Social Construction of Corruption inEurope, Ashgate 2012.
Diana Schmidt-Pfister, Holger Moroff (eds.). Fighting Corruption inEastern Europe. A Multi-level Perspective. Routledge: 2013.
Crime and Culture: project led by theUniversityofKonstanz. URL: http://cordis.europa.eu/docs/publications/1224/122489391-6_en.pdf.
World Bank, Fighting Corruption in Public Services, ChroniclingGeorgia's Reforms, The World Bank 2012. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/518301468256183463/pdf/664490PUB0EPI0065774B09780821394755.pdf.
Similar Christofer Berglund, Johan Engvall. How GeorgiaStamped Out Corruption on Campus. Foreign Policy of 3 September 2015. URL: http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/09/03/how-georgia-stamped-out-corruption-on-campus/.
Arpine Karapetyan, Arzu Abdullayeva, Tamar Pataraia. State of the Fight Against Corruption in the South Caucasus. CASCADE European Policy Brief, August 2015. URL: http://www.cascade-caucasus.eu/en_GB/759.
Global Anti-Corruption Blog. URL: https://globalanticorruptionblog.com.
Тhe speech of Hillary Clinton on International Anti-Corruption Day 2009. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nT4OKJ_4Wh0.
Art 6 UNCAC.JakartaStatement on Principles for Anti-Corruption Agencies. URL: https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/WG-Prevention/Art_6_Preventive_anti-corruption_bodies/JAKARTA_STATEMENT_en.pdf.
Indira Carr and Opi Outhwaite. The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in Combating Corruption. Theory and Practice.SuffolkUniversityLaw Review XLIV: 3 (2011) 615-664. URL: https://www.academia.edu/1213559.
Anti-Corruption Practice Note of December 2008 «Mainstreaming Anti-Corruption in Development». URL: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/democratic-governance/anti-corruption/mainstreaming-anti-corruption-in-development.html..
GOST Style Citations
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Copyright (c) 2017 Thomas Kruessmann
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.